摘要ZnO is introduced as an alternative to TiO2 in dye sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) due to its band gap similar to TiO2, higher electron mobility, and flexible procedures of preparations. Several samples of ZnO films are prepared with the hydrothermal synthesis method and the sol-gel technique, respectively. These ZnO films were assembled as photoanodes in DSSCs using N3 dye as the sensitizer. The ZnO-based cells prepared by the hydrothermal synthesis show typical current source characteristics, whose fill factor (FF) is 0.44 and photo-to-electric power conversion efficiency is 0.34%. On the other hand, all the samples prepared with the sol-gel technique show accompanied source characteristics with relatively higher power conversion efficiencies (1%) but a lower FF (0.26). X-ray diffraction (XRD) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements indicate that the sol-gel samples have small particles sizes. Therefore, sol-gel samples could adsorb more dye molecules to generate high conversion efficiencies. At the same time, more grain boundaries make it more possible for injected electrons to recombine with the oxidized electrolyte. Hydrothermal samples have bigger grains, so they show poor conversion efficiency and relatively high FF.
Abstract：ZnO is introduced as an alternative to TiO2 in dye sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) due to its band gap similar to TiO2, higher electron mobility, and flexible procedures of preparations. Several samples of ZnO films are prepared with the hydrothermal synthesis method and the sol-gel technique, respectively. These ZnO films were assembled as photoanodes in DSSCs using N3 dye as the sensitizer. The ZnO-based cells prepared by the hydrothermal synthesis show typical current source characteristics, whose fill factor (FF) is 0.44 and photo-to-electric power conversion efficiency is 0.34%. On the other hand, all the samples prepared with the sol-gel technique show accompanied source characteristics with relatively higher power conversion efficiencies (1%) but a lower FF (0.26). X-ray diffraction (XRD) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements indicate that the sol-gel samples have small particles sizes. Therefore, sol-gel samples could adsorb more dye molecules to generate high conversion efficiencies. At the same time, more grain boundaries make it more possible for injected electrons to recombine with the oxidized electrolyte. Hydrothermal samples have bigger grains, so they show poor conversion efficiency and relatively high FF.
[1] O'Regan B and Gratzel M 1991 Nature 353737 [2] Gratzel M 2001 Nature 414 338 [3] Gratzel M 2004 J. Photochem. Photobio. A: Chem. 164 3 [4] Asbury J B et al 1999 J. Phys. Chem. B 1036643 [5] Bauer C, Boschloo G, Mukhtar E and Hagfeldt A 2001 J.Phys. Chem. B 105 5585 [6] Katoh R et al 2004 J. Phys. Chem. B 108 4818 [7] Law M et al 2005 Nat. Mater. 4 455 [8] Baxter J B et al 2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 86053114 [9] Guo M et al 2005 J. Solid State Chem. 178 3210 [10] Hosono E et al 2005 Adv. Mater. 17 2091 [11] Tornow J et al 2007 J. Phys. Chem. C 111 8692 [12] Sodergren S et al 1994 J. Phys. Chem. 985552 [13] Hara K et al 2000 Sol. Energ. Mater. Sol. Cells 64 115
2009, Vol. 26 
