摘要Asymmetrical halo and dual-material gate structure are used in the sub-100nm surrounding-gate metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) to improve the performance. Using three-region parabolic potential distribution and universal boundary condition, analytical surface potential and threshold voltage models of the novel MOSFET are developed based on the solution of Poisson's equation. The performance of the MOSFET is examined by the analytical models and the 3D numerical device simulator Davinci. It is shown that the novel MOSFET can suppress short channel effect and improve carrier transport efficiency. The derived analytical models agree well with Davinci.
Abstract：Asymmetrical halo and dual-material gate structure are used in the sub-100nm surrounding-gate metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) to improve the performance. Using three-region parabolic potential distribution and universal boundary condition, analytical surface potential and threshold voltage models of the novel MOSFET are developed based on the solution of Poisson's equation. The performance of the MOSFET is examined by the analytical models and the 3D numerical device simulator Davinci. It is shown that the novel MOSFET can suppress short channel effect and improve carrier transport efficiency. The derived analytical models agree well with Davinci.
[1] Baishya S, Mallik A and Sarkar C K 2007 Microelectron. Eng. 84 653 [2] Oh S, Monroe D and Hergenrother J M 2000 IEEEElectron Device Lett. 21 445 [3] Suzuki K et al 1993 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 40 2326 [4] Park J T, Colinge J P and Diaze C H 2001 IEEEElectron Device Lett. 22 405 [5] Nitayama A et al 1991 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 38 579 [6] Hamid H A , I\~{n\'{\iguez B and Guitart J R 2007 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 54 572 [7] Colinge J P 2007 Microelectron. Eng. 84 2071 [8] Yu B et al 2007 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 54 492 [9] Risch L 2006 Solid-State Electron. 50 527 [10] Zanchetta S et al 2002 Solid-State Electron. 46 429 [11] Yeh W and Chou J 2001 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 48 2357 [12] Wakabayashi H et al 2002 IEEE Trans. ElectronDevices 49 89 [13] Reddy G V and Kumar M J 2004 Microelectron. J. 35 761 [14] Borse D G 2002 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 49 1077 [15] Bansal A and Roy K 2005 IEEE Trans. ElectronDevices 52 397 [16] Kumar M J and Chaudhry A 2004 IEEE Trans. ElectronDevices 51 569 [17] Saxena M et al 2004 Solid-State Electron. 481169 [18] Long W et al 1999 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 46 865 [19] Zhou X and Long W 1998 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 45 2546 [20] Chaudhry A and Kumar M J 2004 IEEE Trans. ElectronDevices 51 1463 [21] Misra V, Zhong H and Lazar H 2002 IEEE ElectronDevice Lett. 23 354 [22] Kumar M J, Orouji A A and Dhakad H 2006 IEEE Trans.Electron Devices 53 920
2009, Vol. 26 
