GENERAL |
|
|
|
|
Gravitational Perturbations in Einstein Aether Black Hole Spacetime |
Chi-Kun Ding1,2** |
1Department of Physics, Hunan University of Humanities, Science and Technology, Loudi 417000 2Key Laboratory of Low Dimensional Quantum Structures and Quantum Control of Ministry of Education, and Synergetic Innovation Center for Quantum Effects and Applications, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081
|
|
Cite this article: |
Chi-Kun Ding 2018 Chin. Phys. Lett. 35 100401 |
|
|
Abstract We study the gravitational perturbations in Einstein aether black hole spacetime and find that the quasinormal modes (QNMs) of the first kind of aether black hole are similar to that of a Lorentz violation (LV) model, the quantum electrodynamics (QED) extension limit of standard model extension. These similarities between completely different backgrounds may imply that LV in the gravity sector and LV in the matter sector have some connections: damping QNMs more rapidly and prolonging its oscillation period. Compared to the Schwarzschild case, the first kind of black holes have larger damping rates and the second ones have lower damping rates, and they all have smaller real oscillation frequency. These differences could be detected by the new generation of gravitational antennas.
|
|
Received: 02 June 2018
Published: 15 September 2018
|
|
PACS: |
04.50.Kd
|
(Modified theories of gravity)
|
|
04.70.Dy
|
(Quantum aspects of black holes, evaporation, thermodynamics)
|
|
04.30.-w
|
(Gravitational waves)
|
|
|
Fund: Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No 11247013, and the Fund under Grant No QSQC1708. |
|
|
[1] | Abbott B P et al 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 061102 | [2] | Abbott B P et al 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 141101 | [3] | Driggers J and Vitale S 2017 arXiv:1706.06183 | [4] | Mattingly D 2005 Living Rev. Relativ. 8 5 | [5] | Dai W M, Guo Z K, Cai R G and Zhang Y Z 2017 Eur. Phys. J. C 77 386 | [6] | Colladay D and Kostelecký V A 1997 Phys. Rev. D 55 6760 | | Colladay D and Kostelecký V A 1998 Phys. Rev. D 58 116002 | | Kostelecký V A 2004 Phys. Rev. D 69 105009 | [7] | Coleman S R and Glashow S L 1997 Phys. Lett. B 405 249 | | Coleman S R and Glashow S L 1999 Phys. Rev. D 59 116008 | | Myers R C and Pospelov M 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 211601 | [8] | Rubtsov G, Satunin P and Sibiryakov S 2017 J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 049 | [9] | Jacobsonb T and Mattingly D 2001 Phys. Rev. D 64 024028 | | Jacobson T 2007 Proceedings of Science, From Quantum to Emergent Gravity: Theory and Phenomenology (Trieste, Italy 11–15 June 2007) p 020 | [10] | Jacobson T and Mattingly D 2001 Phys. Rev. D 63 041502 | [11] | Greenwald J, Lenells J, Lu J X, Satheeshkumar V H and Wang A 2011 Phys. Rev. D 84 084040 | | Wang A 2017 Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 26 1730014 | | Ho F H, Zhang S, Liu H and Wang A 2018 Phys. Lett. B 782 723 | [12] | Berglund P, Bhattacharyya J and Mattingly D 2012 Phys. Rev. D 85 124019 | [13] | Ding C, Wang A and Wang X 2015 Phys. Rev. D 92 084055 | [14] | Ding C, Liu C, Wang A and Jing J 2016 Phys. Rev. D 94 124034 | [15] | Oost J, Mukohyama S and Wang A 2018 Phys. Rev. D 97 124023 | [16] | Gong Y, Hou S and Liang D 2018 Phys. Rev. D 97 084040 | [17] | Ding C 2017 Phys. Rev. D 96 104021 | [18] | Chandrasekhar S 1985 The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes 3rd edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press) | [19] | Chen S and Jing J 2010 Phys. Lett. B 687 124 | [20] | Chen S, Wang B and Su R 2006 Class. Quantum Grav. 23 7581 | [21] | Konoplya R A 2003 Phys. Rev. D 68 024018 | [22] | Iyer S 1987 Phys. Rev. D 35 3632 | [23] | Konoplya R A and Zhidenko A 2007 Phys. Lett. B 648 236 | [24] | Fernando S and Holbrook C 2006 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 45 1630 | | Fernando S 2005 Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 37 585 |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|