| FUNDAMENTAL AREAS OF PHENOMENOLOGY(INCLUDING APPLICATIONS) |
|
|
|
|
Simulation of Double-Front Detonation of Suspended Mixed Cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine and Aluminum Dust in Air |
| Wen-Tao Zan1,2, He-Fei Dong2, Tao Hong2** |
1School of Mechatronical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081
2Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing 100094
|
|
| Cite this article: |
|
Wen-Tao Zan, He-Fei Dong, Tao Hong 2017 Chin. Phys. Lett. 34 074701 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The two-phase detonation of suspended mixed cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine (i.e., RDX) and aluminum dust in air is simulated with a two-phase flow model. The parameters of the mixed RDX-Al dust detonation wave are obtained. The double-front detonation and steady state of detonation wave of the mixed dust are analyzed. For the dust mixed RDX with density of 0.565 kg/m$^{3}$ and radius of 10 μm as well as aluminum with density of 0.145 kg/m$^{3}$ and radius of 4 μm, the detonation wave will reach a steady state at 23 m. The effects of the size of aluminum on the detonation are analyzed. For constant radius of RDX particles with radius of 10 μm, as the radius of aluminum particles is larger than 2.0 μm, the double-front detonation can be observed due to the different ignition distances and reaction rates of RDX and aluminum particles. As the radius of aluminum particles is larger, the velocity, pressure and temperature of detonation wave will be slower. The pressure at the Chapman–Jouguet (CJ) point also becomes lower. Comparing the detonation with single RDX dust, the pressure and temperature in the flow field of detonation of mixed dust are higher.
|
|
|
Received: 29 November 2016
Published: 23 June 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] | Hong T, Lin W Z and Qin C S 2010 Chin. J. High Press. Phys. 24 15 (in Chinese) | | [2] | Hong T and Qin C S 2004 Chin. J. Energ. Mater. 12 129 (in Chinese) | | [3] | Veyssiere B, Khasainov B A and Briand A 2008 Shock Waves 18 307 | | [4] | Briand A et al 2010 Shock Waves 20 521 | | [5] | Teng H H and Jiang Z L 2015 The 29th International Symposium on Shock Waves (Switzerland 2015) p 247 | | [6] | Veyssiere B and Khasainov B A 1995 Shock Waves 4 171 | | [7] | Khasainov B A and Veyssiere B 1996 Shock Waves 6 9 | | [8] | Uphoff U and Hanel D 1996 Shock Waves 6 17 | | [9] | Michael C 1998 The 11th International Detonation Symposium (Colorado 1998) p 193 | | [10] | Khasainov B A and Ermolaev B S 2002 The 12th International Detonation Symposium (California 2002) p 501 | | [11] | Hong T et al 2009 Expl. Shock Wave 29 468 (in Chinese) | | [12] | Chang S C 1995 J. Comput. Phys. 119 295 | | [13] | Zhang D L and Wang J T 2009 Chin. J. Comput. Phys. 26 211 | | [14] | Wang J T et al 2007 Chin. J. Comput. Phys. 24 395 | | [15] | Wang G et al 2010 Chin. Phys. Lett. 27 024701 | | [16] | Dong H F et al 2011 Chin. Phys. Lett. 28 030203 | | [17] | Liu D Y 1993 Fluid Dynamics of Two-Phase Systems (Beijing: Higher Education Press) (in Chinese) | | [18] | Price E W 1984 Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics: Fundamentals of Solid-Propellant Combustion (New York 1984) p 479 | | [19] | Hong T and Qin C S 2003 Expl. Shock Wave 23 295 (in Chinese) | | [20] | Sehliehting H 1983 Boudary Layer Theory (New York: McGraw-Hill) | | [21] | Yang S M and Tao W S 2006 Heat Transfer Theory (Beijing: Higher Education Press) (in Chinese) | | [22] | Eidelman S and Yang X L 1993 Combust Sci. Tech. 89 201 | | [23] | Tulis A J and Selman J R 1982 The 19th International Symposium on Combustion (The Combustion Institute 1982) p 655 |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
