CROSS-DISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
|
|
|
|
Effects of Labeling Thiophilic FRET Dyes on the Stability and Dimerization Process of β-Lactoglobulin |
PAN Hai, XIE Jin-Bing, CAO Yi**, QIN Meng**, WANG Wei
|
National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructure and Department of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093
|
|
Cite this article: |
PAN Hai, XIE Jin-Bing, CAO Yi et al 2011 Chin. Phys. Lett. 28 118702 |
|
|
Abstract The stability and dimeric state of β−lactoglobulin (β−lg) can be dramatically affected by labeling the thiophilic agent to Cys121, whereas the underlining mechanism of such an effect is still unclear. We label a fluorescence-resonance-energy-transfer (FRET) pair of donor (1,5-IAEDANS) and acceptor (5-IAF) dyes to Cys121 of β−lg monomers to investigate the effect of bulky thiophilic modification on the structure and stability of β−lg. It is found that the modification dramatically destroys the native structure of β−lg and results in an obvious increase of the α−helical content, coincident with the accumulation of non-native α−helical intermediates during its folding process. Importantly, the dimeric state of β-lg can still be reached whereas its dimerization rate decreases dramatically, allowing us to characterize the dimerization process using the FRET method based on a stopped-flow apparatus. Our results reveal that the dimerization process occurs before the completely folding of individual monomers, providing direct evidence on the cooperativity of folding and binding processes.
|
Keywords:
87.15.Hm
87.15.Bg
|
|
Received: 25 June 2011
Published: 30 October 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Godovac-Zimmermann J, 1988 Trends Biochem. Sci. 13 64
[2] Sawyer L and Kontopidis G, 2000 Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Protein Struct. Mol. Enzym. 1482 136
[3] Brownlow S, Cabral J H M, Cooper R, Flower D R, Yewdall S J, Polikarpov I, North A C T and Sawyer L 1997 Structure 5 481
[4] Kuwata K, Hoshino M, Forge V, Era S, Batt C A and Goto Y 1999 Protein Sci. 8 2541
[5] Qin B Y, Bewley M C, Creamer L K, Baker H M, Baker E N and Jameson G B 1998 Biochemistry 37 14014
[6] Ding H and Luo L F 2009 Chin. Phys. Lett. 26 098701
[7] Sun L, Wang J and Wang W 2010 Chin. Phys. Lett. 27 038702
[8] Sakurai K, Oobatake M and Goto Y, 2001 Protein Sci. 10 2325
[9] Burova T V, Choiset Y, Tran V and Haertle T 1998 Protein Eng. 11 1065
[10] Sakai K, Sakurai K, Sakai M, Hoshino M and Goto Y 2000 Protein Sci. 9 1719
[11] Wang X C, Wang S J and Ma H M 2008 Analyst 133 478
[12] Yamasaki R, Hoshino M, Wazawa T, Ishii Y, Yanagida T, Kawata Y, Higurashi T, Sakai K, Nagai J and Goto Y 1999 J. Mol. Biol. 292 965
[13] Haran G, Haas E, Szpikowska B K and Mas M T 1992 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89 11764
[14] Hamada D, Segawa S and Goto Y, 1996 Nat. Struct. Biol. 3 868
[15] Kuwajima K, Yamaya H and Sugai S 1996 J. Mol. Biol. 264 806
[16] Hamada D and Goto Y 1997 J. Mol. Biol. 269 479
[17] Forge V, Hoshino M, Kuwata K, Arai M, Kuwajima K, Batt C A and Goto Y 2000 J. Mol. Biol. 296 1039
[18] D'Alfonso L, Collini M and Baldini G 2002 Biochemistry 41 326
[19] Tsukamoto S, Yamashita T, Yamada Y, Fujiwara K, Maki K, Kuwajima K, Matsumura Y, Kihara H, Tsuge H and Ikeguchi M 2009 Proteins 76 226
[20] Cho Y J, Batt C A and Sawyer L 1994 J. Biol. Chem. 269 11102
[21] Viseu M I, Melo E P, Carvalho T I, Correia R F and Costa S M B 2007 Biophys. J. 93 3601
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|