| NUCLEAR PHYSICS |
|
|
|
|
Relativistic Mean Field Study on Halo Structures of Mirror Nuclei |
| LIANG Yu-Jie1, LI Yan-Song2, LIU Zu-Hua1, ZHOU Hong-Yu1 |
| 1The Key Laboratory of Beam Technology and Material Modification of Ministry of Education, Institute of Low Energy Nuclear Physics, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 1008752Department of Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084 |
|
| Cite this article: |
|
LIANG Yu-Jie, LI Yan-Song, LIU Zu-Hua et al 2009 Chin. Phys. Lett. 26 032102 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Halo structures of some light mirror nuclei are investigated with the relativistic mean field (RMF) theory. The calculations show that the dispersion of the valence proton is larger than that of the valence neutron in its mirror nucleus, the difference between the root-mean-square (rms) radius of the valence nucleon in each pair of mirror nuclei becomes smaller with the increase of the mass number A, and all the ratios of the rms radius of the valence nucleon to that of the matter in each pair of mirror nuclei decrease almost linearly with the increase of the mass number A.
|
| Keywords:
21.10.Gv
21.60.Jz
21.10.Dr
|
|
|
Received: 07 August 2008
Published: 19 February 2009
|
|
| PACS: |
21.10.Gv
|
(Nucleon distributions and halo features)
|
| |
21.60.Jz
|
(Nuclear Density Functional Theory and extensions (includes Hartree-Fock and random-phase approximations))
|
| |
21.10.Dr
|
(Binding energies and masses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Tanihata I et al 1985 Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 2676
[2] Mitting W et al 1987 Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 1889
[3] Suzuki Y and Ikeda K 1988 Phys. Rev. C 38 410
[4] Zhukov M V et al 1993 Phys. Rep. 231 151
[5] Ren Z Z, Chen B Q, Ma Z Y and Xu G O 1996 Phys.Rev. C 53 R572
[6] Morlock R et al 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 3837
[7] Liu Z H et al 2001 Phys. Rev. C 64 034312
[8] Horowitz C J and Serot B D 1981 Nucl. Phys. A 368 503
[9] Reinhard P G et al 1986 Z. Phys. 323 13
[10] Balantekin A B et al 1986 Phys. Rev. Lett. 572916
[11] Sharma M M, Nagarajan M A and Ring P 1993 Phys.Lett. B 312 377
[12] Warrier L S and Gambhir Y K 1994 Phys. Rev. C 49 871
[13] Ring P 1996 Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 37 193
[14] Lalazissis G A, Konig J and Ring P 1997 Phys. Rev.C 55 540
[15] Meng J et al 1998 Phys. Rev. C 58 R628
[16] Li Y S and Long G L 2004 Commun. Theor. Phys. 41 429
[17] Zhang H Y et al 2003 Chin. Phys. Lett. 201462
[18] Chen J G et al 2005 Eur. Phys. J. A 23 11
[19] Ren Z Z, Amand F and Bobyk A 1998 Phys. Rev. C 57 2752
[20] de Vries H, de Jager C W and de Vries C 1987 At.Data Nucl. Data Tables 36 495
[21] Audi G and Wapstra A H 1993 Nucl. Phys. A 565 1
[22] Riisager K 1994 Rev. Mod. Phys. 66 1105
[23] Jensen A S and Riisager K 2000 Phys. Lett. B 480 39
[24] Liu Z H, Zhang X Z and Zhang H Q 2003 Phys. Rev. C 68 024305
[25] Minamisono T et al 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 692058
[26] Kelley J H et al 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 775020
[27] Liu Z H and Bao J D 2004 Chin. Phys. Lett. 21 457
[28] Brown B A and Hansen P G 1996 Phys. Lett. B 381 391
[29] Ren Z Z, Mitting W and Sarazin F 1999 Nucl. Phys.A 652 250
[30] Fang D Q et al 2001 Eur. Phys. J. A 12 335
[31] Liu Z H et al 2004 Phys. Rev. C 69 034326 |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
