Original Articles |
|
|
|
|
Solvent Suppression in Intermolecular Multiple-Quantum Coherence Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectra with Only z-axis Gradients |
FENG Hai 1,2;ZHANG Sheng-Chun 2;CAI Shu-Hui2;CHEN Zhong2;FENG Ji1 |
1Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 1000802Department of Physics, State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surface, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005 |
|
Cite this article: |
FENG Hai, ZHANG Sheng-Chun, CAI Shu-Hui et al 2007 Chin. Phys. Lett. 24 913-916 |
|
|
Abstract The solvent peak in the intermolecular multiple-quantum coherence spectra can be suppressed by either applying pulse field gradients or spinning sample along the magic angle direction (ψ=54.7). However, these two methods also suppress the signals of the solute. We design two pulse sequences with only z-axis gradients to suppress the solvent peak without reducing the intensity of solute signals. Compared to the former pulse sequence, the latter pulse sequence is insensitive to the imperfection of pulse flip angles. When the flip angles of the second pulse sequence are purposely deviated 1/10 from the optimal values, the solvent peak is still weak. Theoretical expressions, experimental observations and computer simulations demonstrate that the two methods can be used to effectively suppress solvent peak in intermolecular multiple-quantum coherence spectra.
|
Keywords:
32.30.Dx
33.25.+k
76.60.-k
|
|
Received: 06 July 2006
Published: 26 March 2007
|
|
PACS: |
32.30.Dx
|
(Magnetic resonance spectra)
|
|
33.25.+k
|
(Nuclear resonance and relaxation)
|
|
76.60.-k
|
(Nuclear magnetic resonance and relaxation)
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Ledbetter M P, Savukov I M and Romalis M V 2005 Phys. Rev.Lett. 94 060801 [2] Corum C A and Gmitro A F 2004 J. Magn. Reson. 171 131 [3] Warren W S, Richter W, Andreotti A H and Farmer B T 1993 Science 262 2005 [4] Lee S, Richter W, Vathyam S and Warren W S 1996 J. Chem.Phys. 105 874 [5] Brunner E 2001 Concepts. Magn. Reson. 13 238 [6] Jeener J, Grant D M and Harris R K 2002 Encyclopedia ofNuclear Magnetic Resonance (New York: Wiley) vol 9 p 642 [7] Wei D X, Luo J, Sun X P, Zeng X Z, Zhan M S and Liu M L 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 020501 [8] Yao X W, Xue F, Pang W M, Du J F, Zhou X Y and Han R D 2006 Chin. Phys. Lett. 23 1996 [9] Zhu X Q, Cai C B, Chen Z and Zhong J H 2005 Chin. Phys. 14 516 [10] Zhong J H, Chen Z and Kwok E 2000 Magn. Reson. Med. 43335 [11] Warren W S, Ahn S, Mescher M, Garwood M, Ugurbil K, Richter W,Rizi R R, Hopkins J and Leigh J S 1998 Science 281 247 [12] Rizi R R, Ahn S, Alsop D C, Garrett-Roe S, Mescher M, Richter W,Schnall M D, Leigh J S and Warren W S 2000 Magn. Reson. Med. 43 627 [13] Chen Z, Chen Z W and Zhong J H 2004 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 446 [14] Vathyam S, Lee S and Warren W S 1996 Science 272 92 [15] Mattiello D L, Warren W S, Mueller L and Farmer B T 1996 J.Am. Chem. Soc. 118 3253 [16] Dalvit C and Bohlen J M 1996 Magn. Reson. Chem. 34 829 [17] Broekaert P, Jeener J, Lippens G and Wieruszeski J M 2000 J.Magn. Reson. 145 259 [18] Chen Z, Zhu X Q, Cai S H and Zhong J H 2006 Chem. Phys.Lett. 417 48 [19] Zhu X Q, Chen Z, Cai S H and Zhong J H 2006 Chem. Phys.Lett. 421 171 [20] Chen Z, Chen Z W and Zhong J H 2001 J. Chem. Phys. 11510769 [21] Balla D and Faber C 2004 Chem. Phys. Lett. 393 464 [22] Morse P M and Feshbach H 1953 Methods of Theoretical Physics(New York: McGraw-Hill) [23] Chen Z, Chen Z W and Zhong J H 2002 J. Chem. Phys. 1178426 [24] Cai C B, Chen Z, Cai S H and Zhong J H 2005 J. Magn. Reson. 172 242Φφψ |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|