CROSS-DISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
|
|
|
|
Structural and Optical Behavior of Germanium Quantum Dots |
ALIREZA Samavati1, Z. Othaman1, S. K. Ghoshal2**, M. R. Dousti2, R. J. Amjad2 |
1Ibn Sina Institute for Fundamental Science Studies, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor, Malaysia 2Advanced Optical Material Research Group, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Skudai, Johor, Malaysia
|
|
Cite this article: |
ALIREZA Samavati, Z. Othaman, S. K. Ghoshal et al 2012 Chin. Phys. Lett. 29 118101 |
|
|
Abstract Controlled growth, synthesis, and characterization of a high density and large-scale Ge nanostructure by an easy fabrication method are key issues for optoelectronic devices. Ge quantum dots (QDs) having a density of ~1011 cm?2 and a size as small as ~8 nm are grown by radio frequency magnetron sputtering on Si (100) substrates under different heat treatments. The annealing temperature dependent structural and optical properties are measured using AFM, XRD, FESEM, EDX, photoluminescence (PL) and Raman spectroscopy. The effect of annealing is found to coarsen the Ge QDs from pyramidal to dome-shaped structures as they grow larger and transform the nanoislands into relatively stable and steady state configurations. Consequently, the annealing allows the intermixing of Si into the Ge QDs and thereby reduces the strain energy that enhances the formation of larger nanoislands. The room temperature PL spectra exhibits two strong peaks at ~2.87 eV and ~3.21 eV attributed to the interaction between Ge, GeOx and the possibility of the presence of QDs core-shell structure. No reports so far exist on the red shift ~0.05 eV of the strongest PL peak that results from the effect of quantum confinement. Furthermore, the Raman spectra for the pre-annealed QDs that consist of three peaks at around ~305.25 cm?1, 409.19 cm?1 and 515.25 cm?1 are attributed to Ge-Ge, Ge-Si, and Si-Si vibration modes, respectively. The Ge-Ge optical phonon frequency shift (~3.27 cm?1) associated with the annealed samples is assigned to the variation of shape, size distribution, and Ge composition in different QDs. The variation in the annealing dependent surface roughness and the number density is found to be in the range of ~0.83 to ~2.24 nm and ~4.41 to ~2.14 × 1011 cm?2, respectively.
|
|
Received: 06 July 2012
Published: 28 November 2012
|
|
PACS: |
81.07.-b
|
(Nanoscale materials and structures: fabrication and characterization)
|
|
78.67.-n
|
(Optical properties of low-dimensional, mesoscopic, and nanoscale materials and structures)
|
|
79.20.Rf
|
(Atomic, molecular, and ion beam impact and interactions with surfaces)
|
|
78.55.Ap
|
(Elemental semiconductors)
|
|
|
|
|
[1] MacLeod J M, Cojocaru C V, Ratto F, Harnagea C, Bernardi A, Alonso M I and Rosei F 2012 Nanotechnology 23 065603 [2] Liu J L, Wan J, Jiang Z M, Khitun A and Wang K L 2002 J. Appl. Phys. 92 6804 [3] Dilliway G D M and Bagnall D M 2003 J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 14 323 [4] Ribeiro G M, Bratkovski A M, Kamins T I, Ohlberg D A and Williams R S 1998 Science 279 3533 [5] Capellini G, Gaspare L, Palange E and Evangelisti F 1997 Appl. Phys. Lett. 70 493 [6] Ray S K and Das K 2005 Opt. Mater. 27 948 [7] Fan W K, Zhang Y and Weifeng Z 2012 Appl. Surf. Sci. 258 1935 [8] Samavati A R, Aldaw F, Ghoshal S K, Othaman Z and Sakrani S 2012 J. Ovonic Res. 8 65 [9] Mestanza S N M, Rodriguez E and Frateschi N C 2006 Nanotechnology 17 4548 [10] Sun K W, Sue S H and Liu C W 2005 Physica E 28 525 [11] Riabinina D, Durand C and Chaker M 2006 Nanotechnology 17 2152 [12] Oku T, Nakayama T, Kuno M, Nozue Y, Wallenberg L R, Niihara K and Suganuma K 2000 Mater. Sci. Eng. B 74 242 [13] Liu J L, Wan J, Jiang Z M, Khitun A and Wang K L 2002 J. Appl. Phys. 92 6804 [14] Ray S K, Das S, Singha R K, Manna S and Dhar A 2011 Nanoscale Res. Lett. 6 224 [15] Singha R K, Das S, Majumdar S, Das K, Dhar A and Ray S K 2008 J. Appl. Phys. 103 114301 [16] Mooney P M, Dacol F H, Tsang J C and Chu J O 1993 Appl. Phys. Lett. 62 2069 [17] Yi J B, Li X P, Ding J and Seet H L 2007 J. Alloys Compd. 428 230 [18] Pavesi L and Ceschini M 1993 Phys. Rev. B 48 17625 [19] Takagahara T and Takeda K 1992 Phys. Rev. B 46 15578 [20] Samavati A R, Ghoshal S K and Othaman Z 2012 Chin. Phys. Lett. 29 048101 |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|