CONDENSED MATTER: STRUCTURE, MECHANICAL AND THERMAL PROPERTIES |
|
|
|
|
Electrical Resistivity of Silane Multiply Shock-Compressed to 106 GPa |
ZHONG Xiao-Feng1, LIU Fu-Sheng1**, CAI Ling-Cang2, XI Feng2, ZHANG Ming-Jian1, LIU Qi-Jun1, WANG Ya-Ping1, HAO Bin-Bin1 |
1Institute of High Temperature and High Pressure Physics, Key Laboratory of Advanced Technologies of Materials (Ministry of Education), Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031 2China Academy of Engneering Physics, Institute of Fluid Physics, Mianyang 621900
|
|
Cite this article: |
ZHONG Xiao-Feng, LIU Fu-Sheng, CAI Ling-Cang et al 2014 Chin. Phys. Lett. 31 126201 |
|
|
Abstract The liquid silane sample, prepared by liquifying pure silane gas at 88.5 K, is multiply shock-compressed to 106 GPa by means of a two-stage light-gas gun and a coolant target system. Electrical resistivity is measured for fluid silane during the period of multi-shock compression in the pressure range from 63.5 GPa to 106 GPa. It is shown that the electrical resistivity reduces to the order of 10?3–10?4 ohm?m after the second shock arrived, which is two orders higher than those of typical melt metals. Though the metallization transition could not be confirmed under the loading condition of our shock experiments, its resistivity drops sharply along with the pressure rise. The phenomenon might be caused by silane decomposed during the pressure loading, due to the fact that, above 100 GPa, we find that its resistivity is close to hydrogen under the same pressure.
|
|
Published: 12 January 2015
|
|
PACS: |
62.50.-p
|
(High-pressure effects in solids and liquids)
|
|
82.40.Fp
|
(Shock wave initiated reactions, high-pressure chemistry)
|
|
85.40.Ls
|
(Metallization, contacts, interconnects; device isolation)
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Wigner E and Huntingdon H B 1935 J. Chem. Phys. 3 764 [2] Lenosky T J, Kress J D, Collins L A et al 1997 Phys. Rev. B 55 R11907 [3] Weir S T, Mitchell A C and Nellis W J 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 1860 [4] Nellis W J 2000 Planet. Space Sci. 48 67 [5] Nellis W J, Weir S T and Mitchell A C 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 3434 [6] Feng J, Grochala W, Jaroń T et al 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 017006 [7] Nellis W J, Hamilton D C and Mitchell A C 2001 J. Chem. Phys. 115 1015 [8] Pickard C J and Needs R J Phys 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 045504 [9] Yao Y, Tse J, Ma Y and Tanaka K 2007 Europhys. Lett. 78 37003 [10] Martinez-Canales, Miguel and Oganov, Artem R and Ma, Yanming and Yan, Yan and Lyakhov, Andriy O and Bergara Aito 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 087005 [11] Eremets M I, Trojan I A, Medvedev S A et al 2008 Science 319 1506 [12] Nellis W J, Moriarty J A, Mitchell A C, Ross M, Dandrea R G, Ashcroft N W, Holmes N C and Gathers G R 1988 Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 1414 [13] Ross M 1979 J. Chem. Phys. 71 1567 [14] Ross M and Ree F H 1980 J. Chem. Phys. 73 6146 [15] Hensel F and Edwards P 1996 Phys. World 9 43 |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|