Chin. Phys. Lett.  2012, Vol. 29 Issue (7): 071201    DOI: 10.1088/0256-307X/29/7/071201
THE PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS |
Pair Production in an Intense Laser Pulse: The Effect of Pulse Length
REN Na1, WANG Jia-Xiang1, LI An-Kang1, WANG Ping-Xiao2
1State Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062
2Key Laboratory of Applied Ion Beam Physics Laboratory (Ministry of Education) and Institute of Modern Physics, Department of Nuclear Science and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433
Cite this article:   
REN Na, WANG Jia-Xiang, LI An-Kang et al  2012 Chin. Phys. Lett. 29 071201
Download: PDF(800KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Production of positron-electron (e+e) pairs in an intense laser pulse is investigated by solving the Dirac equation with analytical and numerical methods. We observe that the probability of the pair production will firstly decrease slowly as the pulse length τ becomes shortened. Then it will increase until τ is reduced to the Compton time τc=ħ/(mec)1.29×10−21 s and finally decrease exponentially to zero. Hence, for a prominent pair production, we not only require that the electric field strength should be higher than the the Schwinger critical value Ecr=m2c3/()≈1.32×1016 V/cm, but also that the pulse duration τ should be larger than τc. The latter is shown to be related to momentum requirement for the transition. For fields with different pulse lengths, the phase and chirp influences upon the pair production are also explored.

Received: 03 February 2012      Published: 29 July 2012
PACS:  12.20.-m (Quantum electrodynamics)  
  41.75.Fr (Electron and positron beams)  
  03.65.Pm (Relativistic wave equations)  
TRENDMD:   
URL:  
https://cpl.iphy.ac.cn/10.1088/0256-307X/29/7/071201       OR      https://cpl.iphy.ac.cn/Y2012/V29/I7/071201
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
REN Na
WANG Jia-Xiang
LI An-Kang
WANG Ping-Xiao
[1] Sauter F 1931 Z. Phys. 69 742
[2] Sauter F 1932 Z. Phys. 73 547
[3] Heisenberg W and Euler H 1936 Z. Phys. 98 714
[4] Schwinger J 1951 Phys. Rev. 82 664
[5] Ruffini R, Vereshchagin G and Xue S 2010 Phys. Rep. 487 1
[6] Ehlotzky F, Krajewska K and Kaminski J Z 2009 Rep. Prog. Phys. 72 046401
[7] Burke D L, Field R C, Horton-Smith G et al 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 1626
[8] Kirk J G, Bell A R and Arka I 2009 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 51 085008
[9] Dietz K and Proebsting M 1998 J. Phys. B 31 L409
[10] Liu S B, Zhang J and Jiang W M 2000 Chin. Phys. Lett. 17 120
[11] Myatt J, Delettrez J A and Maximov A V et al 2009 Phys. Rev. E 79 066409
[12] Xie B S, Mohamedsedik M and Dulat S 2012 Chin. Phys. Lett. 29 021102
[13] Bahk S W, Rousseau P and Planchon T A et al 2004 Opt. Lett. 29 2837
[14] Bulanov S V, Esirkepov T and Tajima T 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 085001
[15] Popov V S 2001 JETP Lett. 74 133
[16] Di Piazza A 2004 Phys. Rev. D 70 053013
[17] Gerry C C, Su Q and Grobe R 2006 Phys. Rev. A 74 044103
[18] Dumlu C K 2010 Phys. Rev. D 82 045007
[19] Dirac P A M 1958 The principles of Quantum Mechanics 4th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
[20] Avetissian H K 2006 Relativistic Nonlinear Electrodynamics (New York: Springer) chap 9 p 295
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] TANG Suo, XIE Bai-Song, WANG Hong-Yu, LIU Jie, FU Li-Bin, YU Ming-Young. Enhanced Correlation of Electron-Positron Pair in Two and Three Dimensions[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2014, 31(1): 071201
[2] BAO Ai-Dong, SUN Yi-Qian, WANG Dan. An Anomaly Associated with Ward–Takahashi Identity for Pseudo-Tensor Current in QED[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2012, 29(12): 071201
[3] XIE Bai-Song, Mohamedsedik Melike, Dulat Sayipjamal. Electron-Positron Pair Production in an Elliptic Polarized Time Varying Field[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2012, 29(2): 071201
[4] ZENG Ran**, YANG Ya-Ping, . Repulsive and Restoring Casimir Forces Based on Magneto-Optical Effect[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2011, 28(5): 071201
[5] XIONG Ai-Min, CHEN Xiao-Song. Casimir Force of Piston Systems with Arbitrary Cross Sections under Different Boundary Conditions[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2009, 26(6): 071201
[6] S. H. Kim. Electric-Wiggler-Enhanced Three-Quantum Scattering and the Output Power Affected by this Scattering in a Free-Electron Laser[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2009, 26(1): 071201
[7] LIANG Wen-Feng, WU Ming, LIU Hui, CHEN Xiang-Song. Gauge-Invariant Spin and Orbital Angular Momentum of Laguerre--Gaussian Laser[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2008, 25(12): 071201
[8] ZHANG Ying, WANG Qing. Gauge Covariant Fermion Propagator in the Presence of Arbitrary External Gauge Field and Its Schwinger--Dyson Equation[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2008, 25(4): 071201
[9] WANG Jing, ZHANG Xiang-Dong, PEI Shou-Yong, LIU Da-He. Temperature Tuning of Casimir Effect[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2006, 23(9): 071201
[10] SHENG Zheng-Mao, FU Yong-Ming, YU Hai-Bo. Noncommutative QED Threshold Energy versus Optimum Collision Energy[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2005, 22(3): 071201
[11] CHENG Tai-Wang, LI Xiao-Feng, AO Shu-Yan, FU Pan-Ming. Interpretation of Plateau in High-Harmonic Generation [J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2003, 20(9): 071201
[12] AO Shu-Yan, CHENG Tai-Wang, LI Xiao-Feng, WU Ling-An, FU Pan-Ming. Energy Quantization and Probability Density of Electron in Intense-Field-Atom Interactions[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2003, 20(9): 071201
[13] AO Shu-Yan, CHENG Tai-Wang, LI Xiao-Feng, PAN Shou-Fu, FU Pan-Ming. Quantum Electrodynamics Theory of Laser Assisted Recombination[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2003, 20(4): 071201
[14] DING Jian-Wen, YAN Xiao-Hong, CAO Jue-Xian, WANG Deng-Long,. Quantum Dynamics of One-Dimensional Nanocrystalline Solids[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2002, 19(10): 071201
[15] WANG Zhengzhi. e+e- → JETS FOR MULTIPLICITY DISTRIBUTION[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 1990, 7(3): 071201
Viewed
Full text


Abstract