GEOPHYSICS, ASTRONOMY, AND ASTROPHYSICS |
|
|
|
|
Dynamic Processes of Cross-Tail Current in the Near-Earth Magnetotail |
LU Xing-Qiang1, MA Zhi-Wei1,2 |
1Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 2300312Institute for Fusion Theory and Simulation, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027 |
|
Cite this article: |
LU Xing-Qiang, MA Zhi-Wei 2009 Chin. Phys. Lett. 26 059401 |
|
|
Abstract Current dynamic processes in realistic magnetotail geometry are studied by Hall magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations under various driven conditions and Hall effects. Associated with the external driving force, a thin current sheet with a broad extent is built up in the near-Earth magnetotail. The time evolution for the formation of the current sheet comprises two phases: slow growth and a fast impulsive phase before the near-Earth disruption of the current sheet resulting from the fast magnetic reconnection. The simulation results indicate that as the external driving force increases, the site and the tailward speed of the near-Earth current disruption region are closer to the Earth and faster, respectively. Whether the near-Earth disruption of the current sheet takes place or not is mainly controlled by Hall effects. It is found that there is no sudden disruption of the current sheet in the near-Earth region if the ion inertial length is below di=0.04.
|
Keywords:
94.30.Lr
94.30.C-
94.30.Cp
|
|
Received: 30 October 2008
Published: 23 April 2009
|
|
PACS: |
94.30.Lr
|
(Magnetic storms, substorms)
|
|
94.30.C-
|
(Magnetospheric configuration and dynamics)
|
|
94.30.cp
|
(Magnetic reconnection)
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Kaufmann R L 1987 J. of Geophys. Res. 92 7471 [2] Lui A T Y 2003 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion. 45 841 [3] Ohtani S, Takahashi K, Zanetti L J, Potemra T A et al 1992 J. Geophys. Res. 97 19331 [4] Bhattacharjee A, Ma Z W and Wang X G 1998 Geophys.Res. Lett. 25 861 [5] Ma Z W, Bhattacharjee A 1998 Geophys. Res. Lett. 25 3277 [6] Ma Z W, Bhattacharjee A 1999 Geophys. Res. Lett. 26 3337 [7] Ma Z W, Wang X G and Bhattacharjee A 1995 Geophys.Res. Lett. 22 2985 [8] Nishida A and Nagayama N 1973 J. Geophys. Res. 78 3782 [9] Ohtani S, Kokubun S, Elphic R C and Russell C T 1988 J. Geophys. Res. 93 9709 [10] Lui A T Y, Lopez R E, Anderson B J et al 1992 J.Geophys. Res. 97 1461 [11] Ohtani S, Kokubun S and Russell C T 1992 Geophys.Res. Lett. 97 3129 [12] Ma Z W 2008 Phys. Plasmas. 15 032906 [13] Lui A T Y, Volwerk M et al 2008 J. Geophys. Res. 113 A07S26 [14] Birn J, Hesse M and Schindler K 1996 J. Geophys.Res. 101 12939 [15] Vaivads A, Khotyaintsev Y, Andre M et al 2004 Geophys. Res. Lett. 93 105001 [16] Xiao C J, Wang X, Pu Z Y et al 2007 Geophys. Res.Lett. 34 L01101 [17] Wang X, Yang H A and Jin S P 2006 Phys. Plasmas. 13 060702 [18] Tsyganenko N A 1989 Planet. Space Sci. 37 5 [19] Sergeev V A, Mitchell D G, Russell C T and Williams D J1993 J. Geophys. Res. 98 17345 [20] Lee L C, Zhang L, Choe G S and Cai H J 1995 Geophys.Res. Lett. 22 1137 [21] Asano Y, Mukai T, Hoshino M, Saito Y, Hayakawa H andNagai T 2003 J. Geophys. Res. 108 1189 [22] Jin S P, Hue X P, Zong Q G, Fu S Y, Wilken B andBfichnexr J 2001 J. Geophys. Res. 106 29807 |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|