| NUCLEAR PHYSICS |
|
|
|
|
A Sensitivity Test of Extracting the Optical Potential Parameters for 6He+209Bi from the Transfer Reaction 208Pb(7Li,6He)209Bi |
| WU Zhen-Dong, YANG Lei**, LIN Cheng-Jian**, JIA Hui-Ming, YANG Feng, XU Xin-Xing, ZHANG Huan-Qiao, LIU Zu-Hua, BAO Peng-Fei, SUN Li-Jie, MA Nan-Ru, ZHENG Lei |
China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing 102413
|
|
| Cite this article: |
|
WU Zhen-Dong, YANG Lei, LIN Cheng-Jian et al 2014 Chin. Phys. Lett. 31 092401 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Recently, an indirect method has been proposed to study the optical model potential of exotic nuclear systems by fitting the transfer reaction angular distribution. The sensitivity test of this transfer method is performed with 208Pb(7Li,6He)209Bi as an example, by varying the potential parameters individually. The results indicate that, except for the ambiguity in the real potential depth V, other optical potential parameters of 6He+209Bi as well as the structural information of the reactions can be extracted reliably. Moreover, the radius parameter of the bound state, rbound, is an extraordinarily sensitive parameter, which should be taken care of in the calculation procedure. The present work provides a theoretical reference for the application of the transfer method.
|
|
|
Published: 22 August 2014
|
|
| PACS: |
24.10.Ht
|
(Optical and diffraction models)
|
| |
24.10.Eq
|
(Coupled-channel and distorted-wave models)
|
| |
25.70.Hi
|
(Transfer reactions)
|
| |
25.70.-z
|
(Low and intermediate energy heavy-ion reactions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Tanihata I, Kobayashi T, Yamakawa O et al 1988 Phys. Lett. B 206 592
[2] Lenske H 1998 J. Phys. G 24 1429
[3] Korsheninnikov A A 2003 Nucl. Phys. A 722 C157
[4] Tanihata I, Hamagaki H, Hashimoto O et al 1985 Phys. Lett. B 160 380
[5] An G P et al 2008 Chin. Phys. Lett. 25 4237
[6] Wu Z D et al 2009 Chin. Phys. Lett. 26 022503
[7] Yang L, Lin C J, Jia H M et al 2014 Phys. Rev. C 89 044615
[8] Igo G 1958 Phys. Rev. Lett. 1 72
[9] Tanihata I 1996 J. Phys. G 22 157
[10] Hansen P G and Jonson B 1987 Europhys. Lett. 4 409
[11] Audi G, Wapstra A H and Thibault C 2003 Nucl. Phys. A 729 337
[12] Aguilera E F, Kolata J J, Nunes F M et al 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 5058
[13] Aguilera E F, Kolata J J, Becchetti F D et al 2001 Phys. Rev. C 63 061603(R)
[14] Kakuee O R, Rahighi J, Sanchez-Benitez A M et al 2003 Nucl. Phys. A 728 339
[15] Kakuee O R, Alvarez M A G, Andres M V, Cherubini S et al 2006 Nucl. Phys. A 765 294
[16] Milin M, Cherubini S, Davinson T et al 2004 Nucl. Phys. A 730 285
[17] Gasques L R, Chamon L C, Pereira D, Guimaraes V et al 2003 Phys. Rev. C 67 024602
[18] Benjamim E A, Lépine-Szily A, Mendes D R et al 2007 Phys. Lett. B 647 30
[19] Lépine-Szily A and Lichtenth?ler R 2007 Nucl. Phys. A 787 94
[20] Bassani G et al 1972 Nucl. Phys. A 189 353
[21] Moro A M, Gomez-Camacho J, Martel I et al 1998 Nucl. Phys. A 628 203
[22] Ellegard C and Vedelsby P 1968 Phys. Lett. B 26 155
[23] Rhoades-Brown M, Macfarlane M H and Pieper S C 1980 Phys. Rev. C 21 2417
[24] Zeller A F, Weisser D C, Ophel T R and Hebbard D F 1979 Nucl. Phys. A 332 515
[25] Wim C and Jan R 2009 Phys. Rev. C 80 011602(R) |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
