| CONDENSED MATTER: ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL, MAGNETIC, AND OPTICAL PROPERTIES |
|
|
|
|
Noncollinear Magnetism Calculation of Iron Clusters with Spin-Orbit Coupling |
| CHENG Zhi-Da1,2, ZHU Jing1,2**, TANG Zheng3
|
1Beijing National Center for Electron Microscopy, Lab of Advanced Materials, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084
2China Iron and Steel Research Institute Group, Beijing 100081
3Key Laboratory of Polar Materials and Devices (Ministry of Education), East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241
|
|
| Cite this article: |
|
CHENG Zhi-Da, ZHU Jing, TANG Zheng 2011 Chin. Phys. Lett. 28 037501 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract We study iron clusters containing 2∼13 atoms by ab initio calculations with both collinear and noncollinear magnetic methods. Spin-orbit coupling is only available in the noncollinear method. After full structural relaxations, it is found that atom positions derived from the noncollinear method have better stability in all clusters, including those having coparallel spin arrangements. Binding energies of clusters calculated by the noncollinear method are also 17.3∼19.8 meV/atom lower, which are too large to ignore. By comparing the magnetic properties and electronic structures from the two methods, we believe that the difference has resulted from spin-orbit coupling. We recommend reconsidering the importance of the noncollinear magnetic method with spin-orbit coupling in magnetic systems. Especially in transition metal clusters when atom positions and energy values are important for determining the crucial properties.
|
| Keywords:
75.75.-c
61.46.Df
75.78.Cd
75.50.Bb
|
|
|
Received: 17 December 2010
Published: 28 February 2011
|
|
| PACS: |
75.75.-c
|
(Magnetic properties of nanostructures)
|
| |
61.46.Df
|
(Structure of nanocrystals and nanoparticles ("colloidal" quantum dots but not gate-isolated embedded quantum dots))
|
| |
75.78.Cd
|
(Micromagnetic simulations ?)
|
| |
75.50.Bb
|
(Fe and its alloys)
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Ling T, Xie L et al 2009 Nano. Lett. 9 1572
[2] Vystavel T et al 2003 Appl. Phys. Lett. 82 197
[3] Cantera-López H et al 2010 Eur. Phys. J. D 57 61
[4] Hobbs D, Kresse G and Hafner J 2000 Phys. Rev. B 62 11556
[5] Morisato T, Khanna S and Kawazoe Y 2005 Phys. Rev. B 72 014435
[6] Ruiz-Díaz P et al 2009 Eur. Phys. J. D 52 175
[7] Cheng Z D, Ling T and Zhu J 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 057101
[8] Oda T, Pasquarello A and Car R 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 3622
[9] Gruner M, Rollmann G, Sahoo S and Entel P 2006 Phas. Trans. 79 701
[10] Gruner M and Entel P 2009 J Phys.: Condens. Matt. 21 293201
[11] Mejia-Lopez J, Romero A H et al 2006 Phys. Rev. B 74 140405
[12] Perdew J P, Burke K and Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865
[13] Diéguez O, Alemany M M G, Rey C, Ordejón P and Gallego L J 2001 Phys. Rev. B 63 205407
[14] Rollmann G, Entel P and Sahoo S 2006 Comput. Mater. Sci. 35 275
[15] Postnikov A V, Entel P and Soler J M 2003 Eur. Phys. J. D 25 261 |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
