| FUNDAMENTAL AREAS OF PHENOMENOLOGY(INCLUDING APPLICATIONS) |
|
|
|
|
Ultrasound Attenuation in Biological Tissue Predicted by the Modified Doublet Mechanics Model |
| JIANG Xin1, LIU Xiao-Zhou1, WU Jun-Ru2 |
| 1Key Laboratory of Modern Acoustics, Institute of Acoustics, Nanjing University, Nanjing 2100932Department of Physics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA |
|
| Cite this article: |
|
JIANG Xin, LIU Xiao-Zhou, WU Jun-Ru 2009 Chin. Phys. Lett. 26 074301 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Experimental results have shown that in the megahertz frequency range the relationship between the acoustic attenuation coefficient in soft tissues and frequency is nearly linear. The classical continuum mechanics (CCM), which assumes that the material is uniform and continuous, fails to explain this relationship particularly in the high megahertz range. Doublet mechanics (DM) is a new elastic theory which takes the discrete nature of material into account. The current DM theory however does not consider the loss. We revise the doublet mechanics (DM) theory by including the loss term, and calculate the attenuation of a soft tissue as a function of frequency using the modified the DM theory (MDM). The MDM can now well explain the nearly linear relationship between the acoustic attenuation coefficient in soft tissues and frequency.
|
| Keywords:
43.80.Cs
43.35.Cg
|
|
|
Received: 04 March 2009
Published: 02 July 2009
|
|
| PACS: |
43.80.Cs
|
(Acoustical characteristics of biological media: molecular species, cellular level tissues)
|
| |
43.35.Cg
|
(Ultrasonic velocity, dispersion, scattering, diffraction, and Attenuation in solids; elastic constants)
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Granik V T 1997 Advances in Doublet Mechanics(Berlin: Springer) p 51
[2] Ferrari M and Granik V T (ed) 1997 Lecture Notes inPhysics: Adv. Doublet Mech. (Berlin: Springer) M45
[3] Wu J R et al 2004 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115 893
[4] Kremkau F W et al 1981 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 7029
[5] Bamber J C 1986 Physical Principles of MedicalUltrasonics (New York: Ellis Horwood Limited) p 200
[6] Wu J R 1996 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99 2871
[7] He P 2000 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107 801
[8] Szabo T L and Wu J R 2000 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107 2437
[9] Auld B A 1990 Acoustic Fields and Waves in Solids2nd edN (Malabar, FL: Krieger) p 251
[10] Liu J and Ferrari M 2002 Disease Markers 18175
[11] Coakley W T and Nyborg W L 1978 Cavitation: Dynamicsof Gas Bubbles: Ultrasound in Its Applications in Medicine andBiology ed Fry F J (Amsterdam: Elsevier) part I p 77
[12] Ferrari M 2000 Biomed. Microdevices 2 27
[13] Jin Y F et al 2004 Chin. Phys. Lett. 21 1562
[14] Sadd M H and Dai Q L 2004 Mech. Mater. 37 641
[15] Ferrari M 2003 Private communication
[16] Girnyk S et al 2006 Ultrasound Med. Biol. 32211
[17] Lee R C and Dougherty W 2003 IEEE Trans. Dielectricsand Electrical Insulation 18 810
[18] Feng R and Chen Z 1986 Chin. J. Acoust. 5 60
[19] Du G H et al 2001 Foudation of Acoustic 2nd edn(Nanjing: Nanjing University) p 472 (in Chinese)
[20] Yang M et al 2006 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1191880
[21] Mark D et al 2006http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cell{\_Biology |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
