| Original Articles |
|
|
|
|
Cross-Correlation of Excitation Functions for Different Fragments and Different Scattering Angles in 27Al(19F,x)y Reactions |
| HAN Jian-Long1,2;WANG Qi1;BAI Zhen1,2;DONG Yu-Chuan1;LI Song-Lin1;DUAN Li-Min1;XU Hu-Shan1;XU Hua-Gen1;CHEN Ruo-Fu1;WU He-Yu1;LI Zhi-Chang3;LU Xiu-Qin3;ZHAO Kui3;ZHOU Ping3;LIU Jian-Cheng3;XU Guo-Ji3;Sergey Yu Kun 4,5 |
| 1Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 7300002Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 1000493China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing 1024134Centro de Ciencias Fisicas, National University of Mexico (UNAM), Cuernavaca, Mexico5Center for Nonlinear Physics, RSPhysSE, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia |
|
| Cite this article: |
|
HAN Jian-Long, WANG Qi, BAI Zhen et al 2008 Chin. Phys. Lett. 25 1251-1254 |
|
|
|
Abstract Excitation functions have been measured for different projectile-like fragments produced in 27Al19F,x)y reactions at incident energies from 110.25 to 118.75MeV in 250keV steps. Strong cross section fluctuations of the excitation functions are observed. The cross-correlation coefficients of the excitation functions for different atomic number Z and for different scattering angle θcm
have been deduced. These coefficients are much larger than the statistical theoretical calculated ones. This indicates that there are strong correlations between different exit channels in the dissipative heavy ion collision of 27Al(19F,x)y.
|
| Keywords:
25.70.Lm
25.70.Pq
24.60.Ky
|
|
|
Received: 15 January 2008
Published: 31 March 2008
|
|
| PACS: |
25.70.Lm
|
(Strongly damped collisions)
|
| |
25.70.Pq
|
(Multifragment emission and correlations)
|
| |
24.60.Ky
|
(Fluctuation phenomena)
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Rosa A D, Inglima G, Russo V et al 1985 Phys. Lett.B 160 239
[2] Ericson T 1963 Ann. Phys. 23 390
[3] Brink D M, Stephen R O, and Tanner N W 1964 Nucl.Phys. 54 577
[4] Hanbury-Brown R and Twiss R G 1954 Phil. Mag. 45 663
[5] Suomij\"{arvi T, Berthier B, Lucas R et al 1987 Phys. Rev. C 36 181
[6] Wang Qi, Li Songlin, Lu Jun et al 1993 Chin. Phys.Lett. 10 656
[7] Wang Qi, Li Songlin, Tian Wendong et al 1999 Chin.Phys. Lett. 16 876
[8] Papa M, Amorini F, Cardella G et al 2000 Phys. Rev.C 61 044614
[9] Berceanu I, Duma M, Moisa D et al 2006 Phys. Rev. C 74 024601
[10] Wang Qi, Lu Jun, Xu Hushan et al 1996 Phys. Lett. B 388 462
[11] Papa M, Cardella G, Dipietro A et al 1995 Z. Phys.A 353 205
[12] Brink D M and Dietrich K 1987 Z. Phys. A 3267
[13] Kun S Yu, Papa M and Sunko D K 1990 Phys. Lett. B 249 1
[14] Kun S Yu 1991 Phys. Lett. B 257 247
[15] Kun S Yu and N\"{orenberg 1992 Z. Phys. A 343 215
[16] Richter A 1974 Nuclear Spectroscopy and Reactions part B ed Cerny J (New York: Academic) p 343
[17] Wilcke W W, Birkelund J R, Wollersheim H J et al 1980 Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 25 389
[18] Kun S Yu, Vagov A V and Vorov O K 1999 Phys. Rev. C 59 R585
[19] Kun S Yu, Vagov A V, Chadderton L T et al 2001 Phys.Rev. C 63 014608
[20] Kun S Yu, Benet L, Chadderton L T et al 2003 Phys.Rev. C 67 011604(R)
[21] Han Jianlong, Wang Qi, Dong Yuchuan et al 2006 Chin.Phys. Lett. 23 2706 |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
