| Original Articles |
|
|
|
|
Measurement and Analysis of Spall Characteristics of High-Pure Aluminium at One-Dimensional Strain Loading |
| QI Mei-Lan1,2;HE Hong-Liang2;YAN Shi-Lin1 |
| 1School of Science, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 4300702Laboratory for Shock Wave and Detonation Physics Research, Institute of Fluid Physics, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621900 |
|
| Cite this article: |
|
QI Mei-Lan, HE Hong-Liang, YAN Shi-Lin 2007 Chin. Phys. Lett. 24 2338-2340 |
|
|
|
Abstract With an impact velocity varying from 196.9m/s to 317.9m/s and ratios of flyer/sample thickness of 2:4 and 3:6, the free-surface velocity profiles of the shock compressed high purity aluminium (HPA 99.999%) samples are measured with a velocity interferometer system for any reflector. Based on the vibrating features of the velocity profiles, the damage behaviour of HPA is analysed. The results indicate that the vibrating amplitude increases with increasing shock stress, and the subsequent reverberations describing the spall become more obvious. When the shock stress in the material is below a critical or smaller than the threshold level, the free-surface velocity profile replicates virtually the form of the compression pulse inside the sample. When the impact stress exceeds a critical value (1.4GPa), the micro damage would
appear, and the free-surface velocity profile changes significantly, showing a series of short-duration reverberations in the profile. When the impact stress exceeds the threshold of damage, a compressive disturbance called the ``spall pulse'' appears in the free-surface velocity profile, and the subsequent reverberation becomes regular again. The measured spall strength of HPA is much higher than those of commercially pure aluminium reported in many references. In addition, the strength of HPA is similar to that of single-crystal aluminium.
|
| Keywords:
61.90.+d
62.20.Fe
62.50.+p
|
|
|
Received: 25 December 2006
Published: 25 July 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Smith J H 1963 Dynamic Behavior of Materials (Philadelphia: ASTM)p 264
[2] Bread B R, Mader C L and Venable D 1967 J. Appl. Phys. 38 3271
[3] Li Y C, Cao J D, Dong J and Yao L 2006 Chin. Quart.Mech. 27 329
[4] Novikov S A 1967 J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 3 109(in Russian)
[5] Stepanov G V, Romanchenko V I and Astanin V V 1977 Probl.Strength 8 96 (in Russian)
[6] Romanchenko V I and Stepanov G V 1980 J. Appl. Mech.Tech. Phys. 21 141
[7] Wang Y G 2006 Study on the Dynamic Tensile Fracture and CriticalDamage of Ductile Metals (Mianyang: China Academy of EngineeringPhysics) p 26 (in Chinese)
[8] Chen X, Asay J R, Dwivedi S K and Field D P 2006 J. Appl.Phys. 99 023528-1
[9] Kanel G I, Razorenov S V , Baumung K and Singer J 2001 J. Appl.Phys. 90 136
[10] Kanel G I, Razorenov S V, Utkin A V, Baumung K, Karov H U andLicht V 1994 AIP Conf. Proc. 309 1043
[11] Kanel G I, Razorenov S V, Bogatch A A, Utkin A V, Fortov V E andGrady D E 1996 J. Appl. Phys. 79 8310
[12] Fortov V E, Kostin V V and Eliezer S 1991 J. Appl.Phys. 70 4524
[13] Schwartz A J, Cazamias J U, Fiske P S and Minich R W 2002 AIPConf. Proc. 620 491 |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
