| Original Articles |
|
|
|
|
A Cavity-QED Scheme for Generating Long-Lived Maximally Entangled States |
| XIANG Shao-Hua 1,2,3;SHAO Bin3;SONG Ke-Hui 1,2;ZOU Jian3 |
| 1Department of Physics and Electronic Information Science, Huaihua University, Huaihua 4180082Research Institute of Information Science, Huaihua University, Huaihua 4180083Department of Physics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081 |
|
| Cite this article: |
|
XIANG Shao-Hua, SHAO Bin, SONG Ke-Hui et al 2007 Chin. Phys. Lett. 24 1467-1470 |
|
|
|
Abstract We propose a potentially practical scheme to generate two-atom maximally entangled states by the large-detuning interaction between two three-level ∧-type atoms and coherent optical fields. Conditioned on the results of detecting cavity field, four pairs of atomic maximally entangled states with unity fidelity and high successful probability can be prepared. We also investigate the influence of the cavity dissipation on the generated entangled
states and discuss the experimental feasibility of our scheme.
|
| Keywords:
03.67.Mn
42.50.Dv
03.65.Yz
|
|
|
Received: 09 December 2006
Published: 17 May 2007
|
|
| PACS: |
03.67.Mn
|
(Entanglement measures, witnesses, and other characterizations)
|
| |
42.50.Dv
|
(Quantum state engineering and measurements)
|
| |
03.65.Yz
|
(Decoherence; open systems; quantum statistical methods)
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]Bell J S 1965 Physics 1 195
[2]Bennett C H et al 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 1895 Wang Y H et al 2006 Chin. Phys. Lett. 23 3142
[3] Bennett C H and Wiesner S J 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 692881 Liu W T et al 2006 Chin. Phys. Lett. 23 3148
[4] Bourennane M et al 2001 Phys. Rev. A 64 012306
[5] Kwiat P G et al 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 4337 Pan J W and Zeilinger A 1998 Phys. Rev. A 57 2208
[6] Zheng S B et al 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 2392 Solano E et al 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 027903 Liao X P et al 2006 Chin. Phys. Lett. 23 3138
[7]S\o rensen A and M\o lmer K 2000 Phys. Rev. A 62022311 Fang M F et al 2000 Phys. Rev. A 63 013812
[8]Wang X G et al 2001 Phys. Rev. A 64 012313 Pang C Y et al 2006 Chin. Phys. Lett. 23 3145
[9] Bouwmeester D et al 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 1345 Pan J W et al 2000 Nature 403 515 Pan J W et al 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 4435
[10] Hagley E et al 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 1 Ranschenbentel A et al 2000 Science 288 2024 Ranschenbentel A et al 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 037902
[11]Turchette Q A et al 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 3631
[12] Rowe M A et al 2001 Nature (London) 409 791
[13]Lougovski P 2005 Phys. Rev. A 71 013811
[14] Xu L et al 1994 Phys. B 95 507 Song K H et al 2002 Eur. Phys. J. D 19 267
[15] Plenion M B et al 1999 Phys. Rev. A 59 2468
[16] Seevinck M 2002 Phys. Rev. A 65 012107
[17] Raimond J M et al 2001 Rev. Mod. Phys. 73 565
[18] Jan E et al 2002 Phys. Rev. A 65 050302
[19] Brune M et al 1994 Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 3339
[20] Yurke B and Stoler D 1986 Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 13 |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
