| Original Articles |
|
|
|
|
Characteristics of Spontaneous Emission of Polarized Atoms in Metal--Dielectric Multiple Layer Structures |
| ZHAO Li-Ming1,2;GU Ben-Yuan2;ZHOU Yun-Song1 |
| 1Department of Physics, Capital Normal University, Beijing 1000372Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 603, Beijing 100080 |
|
| Cite this article: |
|
ZHAO Li-Ming, GU Ben-Yuan, ZHOU Yun-Song 2007 Chin. Phys. Lett. 24 3137-3140 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The spontaneous emission (SE) progress of polarized atoms in a stratified structure of air--dielectric(D0)--metal(M)--dielectric(D1)--air can be controlled effectively by changing the thickness of the D1 layer and rotating the polarized direction of atoms. It is found that the normalized SE rate of atoms located inside the D0 layer crucially depends on the atomic position and the thickness of the D1 layer. When the atom is located near the D0--M interface, the normalized atomic SE rate as a function of the atomic position is abruptly onset for the thin D1 layer. However, with the increasing thickness of the D1 layer, the corresponding curve profile exhibits plateau and stays nearly unchanged. The substantial change of the SE rate stems from the excitation of the surface plasmon polaritons in metal-dielectric interface, and the feature crucially depends on the thickness of D1 layer. If atoms are positioned near the D0--air interface, the substantial variation of the normalized SE rate appears when rotating the polarized direction of atoms. These findings manifest that the atomic SE processes can be flexibly controlled by altering the thickness of the dielectric layer D1 or rotating the orientation of the polarization of atoms.
|
| Keywords:
42.50.Ct
32.80.-t
78.20.-e
|
|
|
Received: 10 August 2007
Published: 23 October 2007
|
|
| PACS: |
42.50.Ct
|
(Quantum description of interaction of light and matter; related experiments)
|
| |
32.80.-t
|
(Photoionization and excitation)
|
| |
78.20.-e
|
(Optical properties of bulk materials and thin films)
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Purcell E M 1946 Phys. Rev. 69 681
[2] Lekien F, Hong N Q and Hakuta K 2000 Opt. Commun. 178151
[3] Morawitz H and Philpott M R 1974 Phys. Rev. B 10 4863
[4] Wylie J M and Sipe J E 1984 Phys. Rev. A 30 1185
[5] Snoeks E, Lagendijk A and Polman A 1995 Phys. Rev.Lett. 74 2459
[6] Zhu S Y, Chen H and Huang H 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 205
[7] Petrov E P, Bogomolov V N, Kalosha I I and Gaponenko S V 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 77
[8] Megens M, Wijnhoven J E G J, Lagendijk A andVos W L 1999 Phys. Rev. A 59 4727
[9] Wang X H, Gu B Y, Wang R and Xu H Q 2003 Phys.Rev. Lett. 91 113904
[10] Wang R, Wang X H, Gu B Y and Yang G Z 2003 Phys. Rev. B 67 155114
[11] Urbach H P and Rikken G L J A 1998 Phys. Rev. A 57 3913
[12] Worthing P T, Amos R M and Barnes W L 1999 Phys.Rev. A 59 865
[13] Rikken G L J A 1995 Phys. Rev. A 51 4906
[14] Yablonovitch E, Gmitter T J and Bhat R 1988 Phys.Rev. Lett. 61 2546
[15] Khosravi H and Loudon R 1992 Proc. R. Soc. LondonA 436 373
[16] Drexhage K H 1974 Progress in Optics ed Wolf E(Amsterdam: North-Holland) vol 12 p 163
[17] Chen J, Shen N H, Cheng C, Fan Y X, Ding J P and Wang H T2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 051916
[18] Neogi A, Lee C W, Everitt H O, Kuroda T, Tackeuchi A andYablonovitch E 2002 Phys. Rev. B 66 153305
[19] Gontijo I, Boroditsky M, Yablonovitch E, Keller S, Mishra U Kand DenBaars S P 1999 Phys. Rev. B 60 11564
[20] Paiella R 2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 87 111104
[21] Zhou Y S, Wang X H, Gu B Y and Wang F H 2006 Phys. Rev.Lett. 96 103601
[22] Zhao L M, Gu B Y, Yang G Z and Zhou Y S 2007 Phys.Lett. A (accepted)
[23] Zhou L and Li G X 2004 Opt. Commun. 230 347
[24] Scheel S, Knoll L and Welsch D G 1999 Phys. Rev. A 60 4094
[25] Paulus M, Gay-Balmaz P and Martin O J F 2000 Phys. Rev.E 62 5797
[26] Barnes W L 2006 J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 8 S87 |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
