GENERAL |
|
|
|
|
Chaos Identification Based on Component Reordering and Visibility Graph |
Sheng-Li Zhu, Lu Gan** |
School of Electronic Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731
|
|
Cite this article: |
Sheng-Li Zhu, Lu Gan 2017 Chin. Phys. Lett. 34 050501 |
|
|
Abstract The identification between chaotic systems and stochastic processes is not easy since they have numerous similarities. In this study, we propose a novel approach to distinguish between chaotic systems and stochastic processes based on the component reordering procedure and the visibility graph algorithm. It is found that time series and their reordered components will show diverse characteristics in the 'visibility domain'. For chaotic series, there are huge differences between the degree distribution obtained from the original series and that obtained from the corresponding reordered component. For correlated stochastic series, there are only small differences between the two degree distributions. For uncorrelated stochastic series, there are slight differences between them. Based on this discovery, the well-known Kullback–Leible divergence is used to quantify the difference between the two degree distributions and to distinguish between chaotic systems, correlated and uncorrelated stochastic processes. Moreover, one chaotic map, three chaotic systems and three different stochastic processes are utilized to illustrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method. Numerical results show that the proposed method is not only effective to distinguish between chaotic systems, correlated and uncorrelated stochastic processes, but also easy to operate.
|
|
Received: 06 January 2017
Published: 29 April 2017
|
|
|
|
Fund: Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No U1530126. |
|
|
[1] | Qu H, Ma W T, Zhao J H and Chen B D 2013 Chin. Phys. Lett. 30 110505 | [2] | Gao Z K, Hu L D and Jin N D 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 050507 | [3] | Kong D R and Xie H B 2011 Chin. Phys. Lett. 28 090502 | [4] | Rosso O A, Olivares F and Plastino A 2015 Papers Phys. 7 070006 | [5] | Rosso O, Larrondo H, Martin M, Plastino A and Fuentes M 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 154102 | [6] | Kaplan D T and Glass L 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 427 | [7] | Ortega G J and Louis E 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 4345 | [8] | Jeong J, Gore J C and Peterson B S 2002 IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 49 1374 | [9] | Amigó J M, Kocarev L and Szczepanski J 2006 Phys. Lett. A 355 27 | [10] | Lacasa L, Luque B, Ballesteros F, Luque J and Nuno J C 2008 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105 4972 | [11] | Flanagan R and Lacasa L 2016 Phys. Lett. A 380 1689 | [12] | Jiang W, Wei B Y, Zhan J, Xie C H and Zhou D Y 2016 Comput. Ind. Eng. 101 260 | [13] | Bhaduri A and Ghosh D 2016 Front. Physiol. 7 44 | [14] | Telesca L, Lovallo M, Aggarwal S, Khan P and Rastogi B 2016 Pure Appl. Geophys. 173 125 | [15] | Donner R V and Donges J F 2012 Acta Geophys. 60 589 | [16] | Luque B, Lacasa L, Ballesteros F and Luque J 2009 Phys. Rev. E 80 046103 | [17] | Zhu S L and Gan L 2016 Phys. Rev. E 94 052210 | [18] | Lacasa L and Toral R 2010 Phys. Rev. E 82 036120 | [19] | MacKay D J C 2003 Inf. Theory Inference Learning Algorithms (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) p 37 | [20] | Cheng Y, Hua X, Wang H, Qin Y and Li X 2016 Entropy 18 381 | [21] | Roldán É and Parrondo J M 2012 Phys. Rev. E 85 031129 | [22] | Theiler J, Eubank S, Longtin A, Galdrikian B and Farmer J D 1992 Physica D 58 77 |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|