CROSS-DISCIPLINARY PHYSICS AND RELATED AREAS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
|
|
|
|
Effect of Pulse and dc Formation on the Performance of One-Transistor and One-Resistor Resistance Random Access Memory Devices |
LIU Hong-Tao1,2, YANG Bao-He1**, LV Hang-Bing2**, XU Xiao-Xin2, LUO Qing2, WANG Guo-Ming1,2, ZHANG Mei-Yun2, LONG Shi-Bing2, LIU Qi2, LIU Ming2 |
1School of Electronics Information Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300072
2Laboratory of Nano-Fabrication and Novel Devices Integrated Technology, Institute of Microelectronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029 |
|
Cite this article: |
LIU Hong-Tao, YANG Bao-He, LV Hang-Bing et al 2015 Chin. Phys. Lett. 32 028502 |
|
|
Abstract We investigate the effect of the formation process under pulse and dc modes on the performance of one transistor and one resistor (1T1R) resistance random access memory (RRAM) device. All the devices are operated under the same test conditions, except for the initial formation process with different modes. Based on the statistical results, the high resistance state (HRS) under the dc forming mode shows a lower value with better distribution compared with that under the pulse mode. One of the possible reasons for such a phenomenon originates from different properties of conductive filament (CF) formed in the resistive switching layer under two different modes. For the dc forming mode, the formed filament is thought to be continuous, which is hard to be ruptured, resulting in a lower HRS. However, in the case of pulse forming, the filament is discontinuous where the transport mechanism is governed by hopping. The low resistance state (LRS) can be easily changed by removing a few trapping states from the conducting path. Hence, a higher HRS is thus observed. However, the HRS resistance is highly dependent on the length of the gap opened. A slight variation of the gap length will cause wide dispersion of resistance.
|
|
Published: 20 January 2015
|
|
PACS: |
85.30.De
|
(Semiconductor-device characterization, design, and modeling)
|
|
85.30.Pq
|
(Bipolar transistors)
|
|
85.30.Tv
|
(Field effect devices)
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Yang J J et al 2008 Nat. Nanotechnol.ogy 3 429
[2] Chen G, Song C, Chen C, Gao S, Zeng F and Pan F 2012 Adv. Mater. 24 3515
[3] Sun Q Q, Wang L H, Yang W, Zhou P and Wang P F 2013 Sci. Rep. 3 2921
[4] Ninomiya T, Wei Z G, Muraoka S, Yasuhara R, Katayama K and Takagi T 2013 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 60 1384
[5] Wu L C, Song Z T, Liu B, Rao F, Xu C, Zhang T, Yin W J and Feng S L 2007 Chin. Phys. Lett. 24 1103
[6] Xing Z W, Chen X, W U N J and Ignatiev A 2011 Chin. Phys. B 20 097703
[7] Gilmer D C, Bersuker G, Park H Y, Butcher B, Wang W, Kirsch P D and Jammy R 2011 IEEE IMW 12061836
[8] Paolo L, Rosario R and Fernanda I 2013 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 60 438
[9] Chu T J, Chang T C, Tsai T M, Chen J H and Chang K C 2013 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 34 502
[10] Gao S, Song C, Chen C, Zeng F and Pan F 2012 J. Phys. Chem. C 116 17955
[11] Liu Q et al 2012 Adv. Mater. 24 1844
[12] Liu H T, Lv H B, Yang B H, Xu X X, Liu R Y, Liu Q Long S B and Liu M 2014 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 35 1224
[13] Wang M, Bi C, Li L, Long S B, Liu Q, Lv H B, Lu N D, Sun P X and Liu M 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 4598
[14] Zhang M Y et al 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 105 193501
[15] Deng N, Jia H Y, Wu W and Wu H Q 2014 Chin. Phys. Lett. 31 108504
[16] Lin J, Li D, Chen J S, Li J H and Ma D G 2007 Chin. Phys. Lett. 24 3280
[17] Jin D et al 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 035201
[18] Wang J H, Wang X H, Pang L, Chen X J and Liu X Y 2012 Chin. Phys. Lett. 29 088502
[19] Wu Q Q et al 2013 Chin. Phys. Lett. 30 068502
[20] Lee J H et al 2013 Chin. Phys. Lett. 30 038502
[21] Fang X D, Tang Y H and Wu J J 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 098901 |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|