| CONDENSED MATTER: ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL, MAGNETIC, AND OPTICAL PROPERTIES |
|
|
|
|
Influence of Magnetic Scattering and Interface Transparency on Superconductivity Based on a Ferromagnet/Superconductor Heterostructure |
| PENG Lin1**, LIU Yong-Sheng1, CAI Chuan-Bing2, ZHANG Jin-Cang2
|
1Department of Physics, Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai 200090
2Department of Physics, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444
|
|
| Cite this article: |
|
PENG Lin, LIU Yong-Sheng, CAI Chuan-Bing et al 2011 Chin. Phys. Lett. 28 087401 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract We investigate an antiferromagnet/ferromagnet/superconductor/ferromagnet (AF/F/S/F) spin-valve system with nanoscopic scale, described by Usadel equations in the dirty limit. The results show that the superconducting characteristics in the system strongly depend not only on the mutual orientation and thickness of two ferromagnetic layers, but also on the interface transparency and the magnetic scattering. The superconducting critical temperature can exhibit three types of characteristic behaviors with a variation of interface transparency. In particular, the reentrance phenomenon of the superconductivity is observed at the interface transparency γB ξn /ξf =7.1, while the reentrance phenomenon disappears in the presence of magnetic scattering. In addition, it is also found that the introduction of magnetic scattering results in the decrease of the spin-valve effect. The obtained results could provide some practical recommendations for the spin-valve effect in experimental observation.
|
| Keywords:
74.50.+r
74.78.Fk
75.47.-m
74.80.Dm
|
|
|
Received: 28 February 2011
Published: 28 July 2011
|
|
| PACS: |
74.50.+r
|
(Tunneling phenomena; Josephson effects)
|
| |
74.78.Fk
|
(Multilayers, superlattices, heterostructures)
|
| |
75.47.-m
|
(Magnetotransport phenomena; materials for magnetotransport)
|
| |
74.80.Dm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Jiang J S, Davidovic′ D, Reich D H and Chien C L 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 314
[2] Kontos T, Aprili M, Lesueur J and Grison X 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 304
[3] Dong Z C, Xing D Y and Dong J 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65 214512
[4] Li H, Yang W, Yang X and Qin M 2007 Phys. Lett. A 362 6
[5] Buzdin A I 2005 Rev. Mod. Phys. 77 935
[6] Ryazanov V V, Oboznov V A, Veretennikov A V and Rusanov A Yu 2001 Phys. Rev. B 65 020501
[7] Buzdin A I, Vedyayev A V and Ryzhanova N V 2001 Europhys. Lett. 48 304
[8] Baladié I, Buzdin A, Ryzhanova N and Vedyayev A 2001 Phys. Rev. B 63 054518
[9] Tagirov L R 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 2058
[10] Gu J Y, You C Y, Jiang J S, Pearson J, Bazaliy Ya B and Bader S D 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 267001
[11] Usadel L 1970 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 507
[12] Radovic Z, Dobrosaljevic-Grujic L, Buzdin A I and Clem J R 1988 Phys. Rev. B 38 2388
[13] Radovic Z, Ledvij M, Dobrosaljevic-Grujic L, Buzdin A I and Clem J R 1991 Phys. Rev. B 44 759
[14] Fominov Ya V, Chtchelkatchev N M and Golubov A A 2002 Phys. Rev. B 66 014507
[15] Fauré M, Buzdin A I, Golubov A A and Kupriyanov M Yu 2006 Phys. Rev. B 73 064505
[16] Garifullin I A, Tikhonov D A, Garif'yanov N N, Lazar L, Goryunov Yu V, Khlebnikov S Ya, Tagirov L R, Westerholt K and Zabel H 2002 Phys. Rev. B 66 020505
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
