| ATOMIC AND MOLECULAR PHYSICS |
|
|
|
|
Electron Capture Process in Collisions of Proton with Excited State of Helium |
| WANG Xue-Rong, LIU Ling, WANG Jian-Guo |
| Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing 100094 |
|
| Cite this article: |
|
WANG Xue-Rong, LIU Ling, WANG Jian-Guo 2010 Chin. Phys. Lett. 27 123401 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Total and state–selective cross sections for single electron capture (SEC) from the n=2 excited state of helium colliding by protons are calculated in the energy range of 1.0–100.0 keV/u by using the two–center atomic orbital close–coupling method. The interaction of the active electron with helium ion is represented by a model potential. Total SEC cross sections show a monotonic decreasing trend with increasing collision energy, and display a different behavior compared with the case from the ground state of helium. It is also found that the dominant reaction channel is captured to the H(2p) state up to 40 keV/u, and then the capture to the H(1s) or H(2s) state becomes more pronounced. Moreover, the alignment dependence on the initial states is obtained for the electron capture from He(2p0) and He (2p1).
|
| Keywords:
34.70.+e
34.50.Fa
|
|
|
Received: 06 September 2010
Published: 23 November 2010
|
|
| PACS: |
34.70.+e
|
(Charge transfer)
|
| |
34.50.Fa
|
(Electronic excitation and ionization of atoms (including beam-foil excitation and ionization))
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Andersen N, Gallagher J and Hertel I V 1988 Phys. Rep. 165 1
[2] Hippler R 1999 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 26 1
[3] Allison K 1958 Rev. Mod. Phys. 30 1137
[4] Gryzinski M 1965 Phys. Rev. A 25 720
[5] Williams J F and Dunbar D N 1966 Phys. Rev. 149 62
[6] Hippler R, Faust M, Wolf R, Kleinpoppen H and Lutz H O 1987 Phys. Rev. A 36 4644
[7] Kimura M 1985 Phys. Rev. A 31 2158
[8] Sidorovich V A and Nikolaev V S 1985 Phys. Rev. A 31 2193
[9] Kumar A and Roy B N 1977 J. Phys. B 10 3047
[10] Winter T G and Lin C C 1974 Phys. Rev. A 10 2141
[11] Thiesen T C and McGuire J H 1979 Phys. Rev. A 20 1406
[12] Sidorovich V A and Nikolaev V S 1999 J. Phys. B 16 3243
[13] Ryufuku H 1982 Phys. Rev. A 25 720
[14] Sidorovich V A, Nikolaev V S, Beloshitsky V V and Goloviznin V V 1999 J. Phys. B 13 L583
[15] Chibisov M I 2002 Phys. Usp. 45 1
[17] Kislyalov A I, Afanassiev V I, Khudoleev A V, Kozoski S S and Petrov M P 1998 Diagnostics for Experimental Thermonuclear Fusion Reactors 2 353 (New York: Plenum)
[18] Busnengo H F, Martinez A E and Rivarola R D 1996 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 29 4193
[19] Cohen J S 1996 Phys. Rev. A 54 573
[20] Shah M B, McCallion P and Gilbody H B 1999 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 22 3037
[21] Chibisov M I, Janev R K, Urbain X and Brouillard F 2001 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 34 2631
[22] Chibisov M I, Janev R K, Urbain X and Brouillard F 2002 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 35 5081
[23] Janev R K 2009 The First RCM Meeting on Light Element Atom, Molecule and Radical Behaviour in the Divertor and Edge Plasma Regions (IAEA, Vienna, Austria 18–20 November 2009)
[24] Lisgo S 2009 The First RCM Meeting on Light Element Atom, Molecule and Radical Behaviour in the Divertor and Edge Plasma Regions (IAEA, Vienna, Austria 18–20 November 2009)
[25] Fritsch W, Schingal R and Lin C D 1991 Phys. Rev. A 44 5686
[26] Kuang J, Chen Z and Lin C D 1999 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 28 2173
[27] Liu L, Wang J G and Janev R K 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 032709
[28] Toshima N 1994 Phys. Rev. A 50 3940
[29] Wang J G, Stancil P C, Turner A R and Cooper D L 2003 Phys. Rev. A 67 012710
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
