GEOPHYSICS, ASTRONOMY, AND ASTROPHYSICS |
|
|
|
|
Evolution of Ring Current Protons Induced by Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron Waves |
XIAO Fu-Liang1,2, TIAN Tian3, CHEN Liang-Xu1, SU Zhen-Peng4, ZHENG Hui-Nan4 |
1School of Physics and Electronic Sciences, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha 4100042State Key Laboratory of Space Weather, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 1001903School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 1008714CAS Key Lab for Basic Plasma Science, School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026 |
|
Cite this article: |
XIAO Fu-Liang, TIAN Tian, CHEN Liang-Xu et al 2009 Chin. Phys. Lett. 26 119401 |
|
|
Abstract We investigate the evolution of the phase space density (PSD) of ring current protons induced by electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves at the location L=3.5, calculate the diffusion coefficients in pitch angle and momentum, and solve the standard two-dimensional Fokker-Planck diffusion equation. The pitch angle diffusion coefficient is found to be larger than the momentum diffusion coefficient by a factor of about 103 or above at lower pitch angles. We show that EMIC waves can produce efficient pitch angle scattering of energetic (~100keV) protons, yielding a rapid decrement in PSD, typically by a factor of ~10 within a few hours, consistent with observational data. This result further supports previous findings that wave-particle interaction is responsible for the rapid ring current decay.
|
Keywords:
94.20.Wj
52.35.Hr
94.20.Ny
94.30.Xy
|
|
Received: 07 April 2009
Published: 30 October 2009
|
|
PACS: |
94.20.wj
|
(Wave/particle interactions)
|
|
52.35.Hr
|
(Electromagnetic waves (e.g., electron-cyclotron, Whistler, Bernstein, upper hybrid, lower hybrid))
|
|
94.20.Ny
|
|
|
94.30.Xy
|
(Radiation belts)
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Lu Q M, Wang L Q, Zhou Y and Wang S 2004 Chin. Phys.Lett. 21 129 [2] Wang D Y, Huang G L and Lu Q M 2004 Chin. Phys.Lett. 21 1997 [3] Xiao F L, Zheng H N and Wang S 2005 Chin. Phys.Lett. 22 1552 [4] Xiao F L, Zheng H N and Wang S 2005 Chin. Phys.Lett. 22 517 [5] Zheng H N, Su Z P and Xiong M 2008 Chin. Phys. Lett. 25 3515 [6] Su Z P and Zheng H N 2008 Chin. Phys. Lett. 254493 [7] Su Z P, Zheng H N and Xiong M 2009 Chin. Phys. Lett. 26 039401 [8] Zong Q G, Zhou X Z, Li X, Song P, Fu S Y, Baker D N,Pu Z Y, Fritz T A, Daly P, Balogh A and Re\'me H 2007 Geophys. Res. Lett. 34 L12105 [9] Zong Q-G, Wang Y F, Yang B, Fu S Y, Pu Z Y, Xie L andFritz T A 2008 Sci. Chin. E 51 1 [10] Cornwall J M, Coroniti F V and Thorne R M 1970 J.Geophys. Res. 75 4699 [11] Xiao F L, Chen L X, He H Y and Zhou Q H 2008 Chin.Phys. Lett. 25 336 [12] Fok M-C, Kozyra J U, Nagy A F and Cravens T E 1991 J. Geophys. Res. 96 7861 [13] Lyons L R, and Thorne R M J. Geophys. Res. 77 5608 1972 [14] Summers D and Thorne R M J. Geophys. Res. 1081143 2003 [15] Summers D Ni B and Meredith N P 2007 J. Geophys.Res. 112 A04207 [16] Xiao F L, Tian T and Chen L X 2009 Chin. Phys.Lett. 26 059402 [17] Jordanova V k, Farrugia C J, Quinn J M, Thorne R M,Ogilvie K W, Lepping R P, Lu G, Lazarus A J, Thomsen M F and BelianR D 1998 Geophys. Res. Lett. 25 2971 [18] Jordanova V K, Farrugia C J, Thorne R M, Khazanov G V,Reeves G D and Thomsen M F 2001 J. Geophys. Res. 106 7 [19] Summers D 2005 J. Geophys. Res. 110 A08213 [20] Xiao F L, Shen C L, Wang Y M, Zheng H N and Wang S 2008 J. Geophys. Res. 113 A05203 [21] Xiao F L, Su Z P, Zheng H N and Wang S 2009 J.Geophys. Res. 114 A03201 |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|