CONDENSED MATTER: STRUCTURE, MECHANICAL AND THERMAL PROPERTIES |
|
|
|
|
Comparative Study of Monolayer and Bilayer Epitaxial Graphene Field-Effect Transistors on SiC Substrates |
Ze-Zhao He1,2, Ke-Wu Yang1,2, Cui Yu2, Qing-Bin Liu2, Jing-Jing Wang2, Xu-Bo Song2, Ting-Ting Han2, Zhi-Hong Feng2**, Shu-Jun Cai2 |
1School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130 2National Key Laboratory of ASIC, Hebei Semiconductor Research Institute, Shijiazhuang 050051
|
|
Cite this article: |
Ze-Zhao He, Ke-Wu Yang, Cui Yu et al 2016 Chin. Phys. Lett. 33 086801 |
|
|
Abstract Monolayer and bilayer graphenes have generated tremendous excitement as the potentially useful electronic materials due to their unique features. We report on monolayer and bilayer epitaxial graphene field-effect transistors (GFETs) fabricated on SiC substrates. Compared with monolayer GFETs, the bilayer GFETs exhibit a significant improvement in dc characteristics, including increasing current density $I_{\rm DS}$, improved transconductance $g_{\rm m}$, reduced sheet resistance $R_{\rm on}$, and current saturation. The improved electrical properties and tunable bandgap in the bilayer graphene lead to the excellent dc performance of the bilayer GFETs. Furthermore, the improved dc characteristics enhance a better rf performance for bilayer graphene devices, demonstrating that the quasi-free-standing bilayer graphene on SiC substrates has a great application potential for the future graphene-based electronics.
|
|
Received: 16 May 2016
Published: 31 August 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] | Geim A K and Novoselov K S 2007 Nat. Mater. 6 183 | [2] | Castro Neto A H, Guinea F, Peres N M R, Novoselov K S and Geim A K 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 109 | [3] | Schwierz F, Pezoldt J and Granzner R 2015 Nanoscale 7 8261 | [4] | Cheng R, Bai J, Liao L, Zhou H, Chen Y, Liu L, Lin Y, Jiang S, Huang Y and Duan X 2012 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109 11588 | [5] | Fiori G, Neumaier D, Szafranek B N and Iannaccone G 2014 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 61 729 | [6] | Zhang Y, Tang T T, Girit C, Hao Z, Martin M C, Zettl A, Crommie M F, Shen Y R and Wang F 2009 Nature 459 820 | [7] | Xia F, Farmer D B, Lin Y and Avouris P 2010 Nano Lett. 10 715 | [8] | Riedl C, Coletti C, Iwasaki T, Zakharov A A and Starke U 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 246804 | [9] | Sforzini J, Nemec L, Denig T, Stadtmüller B, L T, Kumpf C, Soubatch S, Starke U, Rinke P, Blum V, Bocquet F C and Tautz F S 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 106804 | [10] | Yu C, Liu Q B, Li J, Lu W L, He Z Z, Cai S J and Feng Z H 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 105 183105 | [11] | Nyakiti L O, Myers-Ward R L, Wheeler V D and Gaskill D K 2012 Nano Lett. 12 1749 | [12] | Feng Z H, Yu C, Li J, Liu Q B, He Z Z, Song X B, Wang J J and Cai S J 2014 Carbon 75 249 | [13] | He Z Z, Yang K W, Yu C, Liu Q B, Wang J J, Li J, Lu W L, Feng Z H and Cai S J 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 067206 | [14] | He Z Z, Yang K W, Yu C, Li J, Liu Q B, Lu W L, Feng Z H and Cai S J 2015 Chin. Phys. Lett. 32 117204 | [15] | Castro E V, Novoselov K S, Morozov S V, Peres N M R, Lopes dos Santos J M B, Nilsson J, Guinea F, Geim A K and Castro N A H 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 216802 | [16] | Min H, Sahu B, Banerjee S K and MacDonald A H 2007 Phys. Rev. B 75 155115 | [17] | Kim D H and Alamo J A D 2010 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 31 806 | [18] | Liao L, Bai J, Cheng R, Zhou H, Liu L, Liu Y, Huang Y and Duan X 2012 Nano Lett. 12 2653 | [19] | Guo Z, Dong R, Chakraborty P S, Lourenco N, Palmer J, Hu Y, Ruan M, Hankinson J, Kunc J, Cressler J D, Berger C and Deheer W 2013 Nano Lett. 13 942 | [20] | Yu C, He Z Z, Li J, Song X B, Liu Q B, Cai S J and Feng Z H 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 108 013102 | [21] | Schwierz F 2013 Proc. IEEE 101 1567 |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|