| Original Articles |
|
|
|
|
Probing the TC2 model via Production of Top Quark Pairs at Tevatron and LHC |
| GU Qin-Zhong 1,2;YANG Hua3;WANG Xue-Lei |
| 1College of Physics and Information Engineering, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 4530072Department of Physics and Information Engineering, Shangqiu Teachers College, Shangqiu 4760003Department of Mathematics and Physics, Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou 450004 |
|
| Cite this article: |
|
GU Qin-Zhong, YANG Hua, WANG Xue-Lei 2007 Chin. Phys. Lett. 24 1513-1516 |
|
|
|
Abstract The topcolour-assisted technicolour (TC2) model is an interesting dynamical theory among the various new physics models. We calculate the total tt cross section and the relative correction of the TC2 model to the cross section at
Tevatron Run II and LHC. At the Tevatron Run II, the cross section predicted by the standard model (SM) is consistent with the experimental data, and in most parameter spaces of the TC2 model, the relative correction of the TC2 model to the cross section is too small to be detectable. We find that the tt cross section is more sensitive to the parameters of the TC2 model at the LHC
and the relative correction of the TC2 model to the cross section is over 10% in general. Such a value of the relative correction should be large enough to be detectable at the LHC. Therefore, it is promising to find the clue of the TC2 model via the tt production at the LHC.
|
| Keywords:
12.60.Nz
14.80.Mz
12.15.Lk
14.65.Ha
|
|
|
Received: 15 December 2006
Published: 17 May 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Yao W M (Particle Data Group) 2006 J. Phys. G 33 1
[2] Abe F (CDF Collaboration) 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 2626 Abachi S (D0 Collaboration) 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 2632
[3] To review, see Beneke M et al 2000 hep-ph/0003033Chakraborty D, Konigsberg J and Rainwater D 2003 hep-ph/0303092Wagner W 2005 hep-ph/0507207
[4] Hill C T 1995 Phys. Lett. B 345 483 Lane K and Eichten E 1995 Phys. Lett. B 352 383 Lane K 1998 Phys. Lett. B 433 96 Cvetic G 1999 Rev. Mod. Phys. 71 513 Popovic M B and Simmons E H 1998 Phys. Rev. D 58 095007 Buchalla G, Burdman G, Hill C T and Kominis D 1996 Phys.Rev. D 53 5185
[5] Hill C T and Parke S J 1994 Phys. Rev. D 49 4454
[6] Eichten E and Lane K 1994 Phys. Lett. B 327 129 Lane K and Eichten E 1995 Phys. Lett. B 352 382 Appelquist T and Triantaphyllou G 1992 hep-ph/9207226
[7] Zhang L, Wang X L, Kuang Y P and Zhou H Y 2000 Phys. Rev. D 61 115007
[8] Yue C X, Zhou H Y, Kuang Y P and Lu G R 1997 Phys. Rev. D 55 5541
[9] Lu G R, Yang H, Yang J M and Wang X L 1996 Phys. Rev. D 54 1083
[10] He H J and Yuan C P 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 28 Lu G R, Yin F R, Wang X L and Wan L D 2003 Phys. Rev. D 68 015002
[11] Wang X L and Wang X X 2005 Phys. Rev. D 72 095012
[12] Hagiwara K and Zeppenfeld D 1989 Nucl. Phys. B 313 560 Barger V, Han T and Zeppenfeld D 1990 Phys. Rev. D 41 2782
[13] Heinson A P 1996 hep-ex/9605010
[14] Hubant F, Monnier E M, Pralavorio P, Smolek K and Simak V 2005hep-ex/0508061
[15] Beneke M et al 2000 hep-ph/0003033The ATLAS Collaboration 1999 ATLAS Detector and Physics PerformanceTDR vol I$\!$I CERN/LHCC 99-14/15 |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
