摘要Photodetachment of a negative hydrogen molecular ion near an interface is studied by using the two-centre model and the closed orbit theory. The calculation results show that the photodetachment cross section is related to the distance between the two centres in the H2- and different molecular ion-interface distances. The comparison between the cross section of H2- near an interface with the section of Hˉ shows that at the equilibrium distance of two centres and at low photon energy, the photodetachment cross section of H2- is about twice the cross section of Hˉ, which shows that the interference of the two nuclei is very strong; when the distance between the two centres is large, the section of H2- is almost the same as the cross section of Hˉ near one interface, which indicates that the interference effect of the two centres anishes.
Abstract：Photodetachment of a negative hydrogen molecular ion near an interface is studied by using the two-centre model and the closed orbit theory. The calculation results show that the photodetachment cross section is related to the distance between the two centres in the H2- and different molecular ion-interface distances. The comparison between the cross section of H2- near an interface with the section of Hˉ shows that at the equilibrium distance of two centres and at low photon energy, the photodetachment cross section of H2- is about twice the cross section of Hˉ, which shows that the interference of the two nuclei is very strong; when the distance between the two centres is large, the section of H2- is almost the same as the cross section of Hˉ near one interface, which indicates that the interference effect of the two centres anishes.
WANG De-Hua. Photodetachment of a Negative Hydrogen Molecular Ion near an Interface[J]. 中国物理快报, 2007, 24(2): 400-403.
WANG De-Hua. Photodetachment of a Negative Hydrogen Molecular Ion near an Interface. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2007, 24(2): 400-403.
[1] Hill S B, Haich C B and Zhou Z et al 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 5444 [2] Wethekam S, Mertens A and Winter H 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 037602 [3] Lloyd G R, Procter S R and Softley T 2005 Phys. Rev.Lett. 95 133202 [4]Simonovic N S 1999 J. Phys. B 30 L613 [5]Ganesan K and Taylor K T 1996 J. Phys. B 29 1293 [6] Wang D H 2006 Chin. Phys. Lett. 23 2745 [7] Petek H, Weida M J, Nagano H and Ogawa S 1999 Science 288 239 [8] Borisov A G, Kazansky A K and Gauyacq J P 2001 Phys.Rev. B 64 201105 [9] Rou P J 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 5086 [10] Rou P J and Hartley D M 1995 Chem. Phys. 236 299 [11] Sjakste J, Borisov A G and Gauyacq J P 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 1561015 [12] Yang G C, Liu Y and Chi X X 2005 Chin. Phys. Lett. 22 2233 [13] Yang G C, Zheng Y Z and Chi X X 2006 J. Phys. B 39 1855 [14] Afaq A and Du M L 2006 Commun. Theor. Phys. 46 119 [15] Szebehely V 1967 Theory of Orbits (New York: Academic) p 100 [16] Du M L and Delos J B 1988 Phys. Rev. A 38 5609 [17] Du M L and Delos J B 1988 Phys. Rev. A 38 1896 [18] Levine N 1975 Quantum Chemistry (London: Boston) p 210
2007, Vol. 24 
