摘要The cross sections for neutralization and detachment in H+--H- collisions in the energy range from 1.0 to 100keV/u are calculated using the two-centre atomic orbital close-coupling (TC-AOCC) method. The results are compared with the available experimental and theoretical data. It is found that the neutralization cross section agrees well with the experimental data by Schon et al. [J. Phys. B 20 (1987) L759] and Melchert et al., [J. Phys. B 32 (1999) L139] especially at low energies. However, for the detachment process, our calculated cross section lies between the experimental data by Melchert et al. and by Peart et al. [J. Phys. B 9 (1976) 3047] for the energy below 15keV/u. Above this energy, our result is smaller than the two experimental data. It is worth pointing out that there exists a large difference between these two experimental data and it is difficult to judge which data is more accurate. Therefore, a high-precision measurement for detachment cross sections is expected to resolve this discrepancy and to test the theoretical calculations.
Abstract：The cross sections for neutralization and detachment in H+--H- collisions in the energy range from 1.0 to 100keV/u are calculated using the two-centre atomic orbital close-coupling (TC-AOCC) method. The results are compared with the available experimental and theoretical data. It is found that the neutralization cross section agrees well with the experimental data by Schon et al. [J. Phys. B 20 (1987) L759] and Melchert et al., [J. Phys. B 32 (1999) L139] especially at low energies. However, for the detachment process, our calculated cross section lies between the experimental data by Melchert et al. and by Peart et al. [J. Phys. B 9 (1976) 3047] for the energy below 15keV/u. Above this energy, our result is smaller than the two experimental data. It is worth pointing out that there exists a large difference between these two experimental data and it is difficult to judge which data is more accurate. Therefore, a high-precision measurement for detachment cross sections is expected to resolve this discrepancy and to test the theoretical calculations.
(Electronic excitation and ionization of atoms (including beam-foil excitation and ionization))
引用本文:
LIU Ling;WANG Jian-Guo. Neutralization and Detachment in H+--H- Collisions[J]. 中国物理快报, 2007, 24(11): 3115-3118.
LIU Ling, WANG Jian-Guo. Neutralization and Detachment in H+--H- Collisions. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2007, 24(11): 3115-3118.
[1] Schon W, Krudener S, Melchert F, Rinn K, Wagner M andSalzborn E 1987 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 20 L759 [2] Melchert F, Krudener S, Huber K and Salzborn E 1999 J. Phys.B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 32 L139 [3] Peart B, Grey R and Dolder K T 1976 J. Phys. B: Atom. Molec.Phys. 9 3047 [4] Peart B and Hayton D A 1992 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 25 5109 [5] Ermolaev A M 1988 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 21 81 [6] Shingal R and Bransden B H 1990 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt.Phys. 23 1203 [7] Fussen D and Claeys W 1984 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 17 L89 [8] Belki\'c D 1997 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 30 1731 [9] Sidis V and Kubach C 1982 Phys. Rev. A 27 2431 [10] Fussen D and Kubach C 1986 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 19 L31 [11] Errea L F, Harel C, Jimeno P, Jouin H, M\'endez L and Riera A1995 Phys. Rev. A 54 967 [12] Bell K L, Kingston A E and Madden P J 1978 J. Phys. B: Atom.Mol. Phys. 11 3977 [13] Shingal R, Bransden B H and Flower D R 1985 J. Phys. B: At.Mol. Phys. 18 2485 [14] Andersen L H, Mathur D, Schmidt H T and Vejby-Chrustensen L 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 892 [15] Fritsch W, Schingal R and Lin C D 1991 Phys. Rev. A 445686 [16] Toshima N 1994 Phys. Rev. A 50 3940 [17] Kuang J and Lin C D 1997 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 30 101 [18] Fritsch W and Lin C D 1991 Phys. Rep. 202 1 [19] Reeves C M 1963 J. Chem. Phys. 39 1 [20] Ermolaev A M and Joachain C J 2000 Phys. Rev. A 62012710-1
2007, Vol. 24 
