Theoretical Investigation on Excitation, Ionization and Capture in H(1s,2s) +H(1s, 2s) Collisions
CHEN Lan-Fang1,2, ZHU Xiao-Long1, MA Xin-Wen1, LIU Ling3, HE Bin3, WANG Jian-Guo3, Ratko JANEV4
1Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 7300002Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 1000493Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing 1000884Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts, PO Box 428, 1000 Skopje, Macedonia
Theoretical Investigation on Excitation, Ionization and Capture in H(1s,2s) +H(1s, 2s) Collisions
CHEN Lan-Fang1,2, ZHU Xiao-Long1, MA Xin-Wen1, LIU Ling3, HE Bin3, WANG Jian-Guo3, Ratko JANEV4
1Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 7300002Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 1000493Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing 1000884Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts, PO Box 428, 1000 Skopje, Macedonia
摘要Cross sections of electron-loss in H(1s)+ H(1s) collisions and total collisional destruction of H(2s) in H(1s) + H(2s) collisions are calculated by four-body classical-trajectory Monte Carlo (CTMC) method and compared with previous theoretical and experimental data over the energy range of 4--100keV. For the former a good agreement is obtained within different four-body CTMC calculations, and for the incident energy Ep>10keV, comparison with the experimental data shows a better agreement than the results calculated by the impact parameter approximation. For the latter, our theory predicts the correct experimental behaviour, and the discrepancies between our results and experimental ones are less than 30%. Based on the successive comparison with experiments, the cross sections for excitation to H(2p), single- and double-ionization and H- formation in H(2s)+H(2s) collisions are calculate in the energy range of 4--100keV for the first time, and compared with those in H(1s)+H(1s) and H(1s)+H(2s) collisions.
Abstract：Cross sections of electron-loss in H(1s)+ H(1s) collisions and total collisional destruction of H(2s) in H(1s) + H(2s) collisions are calculated by four-body classical-trajectory Monte Carlo (CTMC) method and compared with previous theoretical and experimental data over the energy range of 4--100keV. For the former a good agreement is obtained within different four-body CTMC calculations, and for the incident energy Ep>10keV, comparison with the experimental data shows a better agreement than the results calculated by the impact parameter approximation. For the latter, our theory predicts the correct experimental behaviour, and the discrepancies between our results and experimental ones are less than 30%. Based on the successive comparison with experiments, the cross sections for excitation to H(2p), single- and double-ionization and H- formation in H(2s)+H(2s) collisions are calculate in the energy range of 4--100keV for the first time, and compared with those in H(1s)+H(1s) and H(1s)+H(2s) collisions.
[1] Krstic P S et al 1996 Phys. Rev. L 77 2428 [2] Riley M E and Ritchie A B 1999 J. Phys. B 325279 [3] Morgan T J et al 1974 J. Phys. B 7 142 [4] Morgan T J et al 1980 Phys. Rev. A 22 1460 [5] Hill J et al 1979 J. Phys. B 12 2875 [6] Hill J, Geddes J and Gilbody H B 1979 J. Phys. B 12 3341 [7] Gealy M W and Van Zyl B 1987 Phys. Rev. A 363100 [8] McClure G W 1968 Phys. Rev. 166 22 [9] Wittkower A B et al 1967 Proc. Phys. Soc. 91306 [10] Olson R E 1979 J. Phys. B 12 L109 [11] Becker R L and MacKellar A D 1979 J. Phys. B 12 L345 [12] Prasad M A et al 1980 Phys. Rev. A 22 514 [13] Bates D R and Griffing G 1953 Proc. Phys. Soc. A 66 961 [14] Omidvar K and Lee Kyle H 1970 Phys. Rev. A 2 408 [15] Flannery M R 1969 Phys. Rev. 183 231 [16] Bent G et al 1998 J Chem. Phys. 108 1459 [17] Hansen J P and Dubois A 1998 J. Phys. B 31L861 [18] Wang J, Hansen J P and Dubois A 2000 J. Phys. B 33 241 [19] Wang J et al 2000 Phys. Rev. L 85 1638 [20] Riley M E and Ritchie A B 2000 J. Phys. B 335177 [21] Forrey R C et al 2007 Phys. Rev. A 76 052709 [22] Abrines R and Percival I C 1966 Proc. Phys. Soc. 88 861 [23] Abrines R and Percival I C 1966 Proc. Phys. Soc. 88 873 [24] Olson R E and Salop A 1977 Phys. Rev. A 16531 [25] Reinhold C O and Falcon C A 1986 Phys. Rev. A 33 3859 [26] Cohen J S 1982 Phys. Rev. A 26 3008 [27] Ning Y et al 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 022702 [28] He B et al 2006 Commun. Comput. Phys. 1 886
2008, Vol. 25 
