| Original Articles |
|
|
|
|
Influence of Spin--Orbit Force on Nucleon--Nucleon Scattering in the Quark Delocalization Colour Screening Model |
| HUANG Hong-Xia1;CHEN Ling-Zhi2;PANG Hou-Rong3;PING Jia-Lun1; WANG Fan2 |
| 1Department of Physics, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 2100972Department of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing 2100933Department of Physics, Southeast University, Nanjing 210094 |
|
| Cite this article: |
|
HUANG Hong-Xia, CHEN Ling-Zhi, PANG Hou-Rong et al 2008 Chin. Phys. Lett. 25 1617-1620 |
|
|
|
Abstract The symmetric spin--orbit interactions of one-gluon-exchange and confinement are included in the nucleon--nucleon phase shift calculation in the framework of quark delocalization colour screening model. The spin--orbit interaction has little influence on D wave phase shift. For the triplet P waves, 3PT is in good agreement with the experimental data and 3PLS is attractive but not strong enough, whereas 3PC is too strongly repulsive. Our results indicate that the symmetric spin--orbit interaction of one-gluon-exchange and
confinement potential cannot give a good description of the triplet P wave phase shifts. More sophisticated considerations, the delocalization depending on the relative orientation between two cluster, might be needed to improve the description of P-wave NN interaction.
|
| Keywords:
13.75.Cs
12.39.Fe
12.39.Jh
|
|
|
Received: 24 January 2008
Published: 29 April 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Fujiwara Y and Hecht K T 1985 Nucl. Phys. A 444 541 Fujiwara Y and Hecht K T 1986 Nucl. Phys. A 456669 Fujiwara Y and Hecht K T 1985 Nucl. Phys. A 462621
[2] Morimatsu O, Yazaki K and Oka M 1984 Nucl. Phys. A 424 412 Takeuchi S, Shimizu K and Yazaki K 1989 Nucl. Phys. A 504 777
[3] Faessler A and Fernandez F 1983 Phys. Lett. B 124 145
[4] Valcarce A et al 2005 Rep. Prog. Phys. 68 965and references therein
[5] Fujiwara Y, Nakamoto C and Suzuki Y 1996 Phys. Rev.C 54 2180
[6] Zhang Z Y, Yu Y W, Shen P N et al 1997 Nucl. Phys. A 625 59 Dai L R, Zhang Z Y, Yu Y W and Wang P 2003 Nucl.Phys. A 727 321
[7] BES collaboration 2004 Phys. Lett. B \textbf{598 149
[8] Kaiser N, Grestendorfer S and Weise W 1998 Nucl. Phys. A 637 395 Oset E, Toki H, Mizobe M and Takahashi T T 2000 Prog.Theor. Phys. 103 351 Kaskulov M M and Clement H 2004 Phys. Rev. C 70014002 Kaskulov M M and Clement H 2007 Phys. Rev. C 76014001
[9] Wang F, Wu G H, Teng L J and Goldman T 1992 Phys.Rev. Lett. 69 2901 Wu G H, Teng L J, Ping J L et al 1996 Phys. Rev. C 53 1161 Wu G H, Ping J L, Teng L J et al 2000 Nucl. Phys. A 673 279 Ping J L, Wang F and Goldman T 1999 Nucl. Phys. A 657 95
[10] Ping J L, Pang H R, Wang F and Goldman T 2002 Phys.Rev. C 65 044003 Lu X F, Ping J L and Wang F 2003 Chin. Phys. Lett. 20 42
[11] Chen L Z, Pang H R, Huang H X, Ping J L and Wang F 2007 Phys. Rev. C 76 014001
[12] Faessler A, Fernandez F, Lubeck G and Shimizu K 1982 Phys. Lett. B 112 201 Faessler A, Fernandez F, Lubeck G and Shimizu K 1983 Nucl. Phys. A 402 555 Faessler A, Buchmann A and Yamauchi Y 1993 Int. J.Mod. Phys. E 2 39
[13] Brauer K, Faessler A, Fernandez F and Shimizu K 1990 Nucl. Phys. A 507 599
[14] Wang F and Wong C W 1985 Nucl. Phys. A 438620 He Y, Wang F and Wong C W 1986 Nucl. Phys. A 451 653 He Y, Wang F and Wong C W 1986 Nucl. Phys. A 454 541
[15]Shimizu K 1989 Rep. Prog. Phys 52 1 Morimatsu O, Ohta S, Shimizu K and Yazaki K 1984 Nucl.Phys. A 420 573
[16] Koike Y 1986 Nucl. Phys. A 454 509 Koike Y, Morimatsu O and Yazaki K 1986 Nucl. Phys. A 449 635
[17] Suzuki Y and Hecht K T 1984 Nucl. Phys. A 420 525
[18] Valcarce A, Buchmann A, Fernandez F and Faessler A 1995 Phys. Rev. C 51 1480
[19] Zong H S and Wang F 1997 Chin. J. Nucl. Phys. 19 31
[20] Kamimura M 1997 Supp. Prog. Theor. Phys. 62236 Oka M and Yazaki K 1981 Prog. Theor. Phys. 66556
[21] Aendt R A, Roper L D et al 1983 Phys. Rev. D 28 97
[22] Entem D R, Fern\'{andez F and Valcarce A 2000 Phys. Rev. C 62 034002 |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
