A Model Comparison Study of Fragment Production in 140 A MeV 58,64Ni+9Be Reactions

doi:10.1088/0256-307X/32/7/072501

Chin. Phys. Lett.

2015, Vol. 32

Issue (07): 072501 DOI: 10.1088/0256-307X/32/7/072501

NUCLEAR PHYSICS

A Model Comparison Study of Fragment Production in 140 A MeV ^58,64Ni+⁹Be Reactions

MA Chun-Wang^**, ZHANG Yan-Li, WANG Shan-Shan, QIAO Chun-Yuan

Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007

Cite this article:

MA Chun-Wang, ZHANG Yan-Li, WANG Shan-Shan et al 2015 Chin. Phys. Lett. 32 072501

Download: PDF(1024KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Abstract

The cross sections of fragments produced in the 140 A MeV ^58,64Ni+⁹Be projectile fragmentation reactions are calculated by using the antisymmetrized molecular dynamics (AMD) model, the modified statistical abrasion-ablation (SAA) model, and the empirical EPAX2/EPAX3 formulae. The Gogny-g0 interaction is taken as the effective nucleon-nucleon interaction in the AMD calculation, and the decays of fragments obtained from the AMD results are calculated by using the GEMINI code. The calculated cross sections of fragments are compared.

Received: 25 March 2015 Published: 30 July 2015

PACS:	25.70.Mn	(Projectile and target fragmentation)
	24.10.-i	(Nuclear reaction models and methods)
	25.70.Pq	(Multifragment emission and correlations)

TRENDMD:

URL:

https://cpl.iphy.ac.cn/10.1088/0256-307X/32/7/072501 OR https://cpl.iphy.ac.cn/Y2015/V32/I07/072501

Service
	E-mail this article
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
Articles by authors
	MA Chun-Wang
	ZHANG Yan-Li
	WANG Shan-Shan
	QIAO Chun-Yuan

[1] Tsang M B et al 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 062701
[2] Kumar S et al 2011 Phys. Rev. C 84 044620
     Kumar S et al 2012 Phys. Rev. C 86 044616
[3] Famiano M et al 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 052701
     Hilscher D et al 1987 Phys. Rev. C 36 208
     Zhang Y et al 2008 Phys. Lett. B 664 145
     Tsang M B et al 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 122701
[4] Dong J et al 2013 Phys. Rev. C 87 014303
[5] Botvina A S et al 2002 Phys. Rev. C 65 044610
[6] Xu H S et al 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 716
[7] Huang M et al 2010 Nucl. Phys. A 847 233
[8] Marini P et al 2013 Phys. Rev. C 87 024603
[9] Marini P et al 2012 Phys. Rev. C 85 034617
[10] Huang M et al 2010 Phys. Rev. C 81 044618
[11] Huang M et al 2010 Phys. Rev. C 81 044620
[12] Ma C W et al 2011 Phys. Rev. C 83 064620
[13] Albergo S et al 1985 Nuovo Cimento A 89 1
[14] Ma C W et al 2013 Nucl. Sci. Tech. 24 050510
[15] Lin W et al 2013 Nucl. Sci. Tech. 24 050511
[16] Wada R et al 2013 Nucl. Sci. Tech. 24 050501
[17] Ma C W et al 2012 Phys. Rev. C 86 054611
[18] Ma C W et al 2013 Phys. Rev. C 88 014609
[19] Ma C W et al 2012 Eur. Phys. J. A 48 78
[20] Ma C W et al 2012 Chin. Phys. Lett. 29 062101
[21] Ma C W et al 2013 Chin. Phys. Lett. 30 052101 2013 Phys. Rev. C 88 044612
[22] Ma C W et al 2013 Commun. Theor. Phys. 59 95
[23] Ma C W and Wei H L 2014 Commun. Theor. Phys. 62 717
[24] Ma C W et al 2013 Phys. Rev. C 87 034618
[25] Ma C W et al 2013 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 40 125106
[26] Ma C W et al 2014 Phys. Rev. C 89 057602
[27] Ma C W et al 2014 Eur. Phys. J. A 50 139
[28] Aichelin J 1991 Phys. Rep. 202 233
[29] Puri R K and Aichelin J 2000 J. Comput. Phys. 162 245
[30] Ono A et al 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 2898
[31] Ono A and Horiuchi H 1996 Phys. Rev. C 53 2958
[32] Ono A 1999 Phys. Rev. C 59 853
[33] Papa M et al 2001 Phys. Rev. C 64 024612
[34] Papa M et al 2007 Phys. Rev. C 75 054616
[35] Papa M et al 2005 J. Comput. Phys. 208 403
[36] Liu X et al 2014 Phys. Rev. C 90 014604
[37] Minich R W et al 1982 Phys. Lett. B 118 458
[38] Hirsch A S et al 1984 Phys. Rev. C 29 508
[39] Das C B et al 2001 Phys. Rev. C 64 044608
[40] Tsang M B et al 2007 Phys. Rev. C 76 041302(R)
[41] Brohm T and Schmidt K H 1994 Nucl. Phys. A 569 821
[42] Gaimard J J and Schmidt K H 1991 Nucl. Phys. A 531 709
[43] Wei H L and Ma C W 2010 Acta Phys. Sin. 59 5364 (in Chinese)
[44] Fang D Q et al 2000 Phys. Rev. C 61 044610
[45] Ma C W et al 2009 Phys. Rev. C 79 034606
[46] Ma C W et al 2009 Chin. Phys. B 18 4781
[47] Benlliure J et al 1999 Nucl. Phys. A 660 87
[48] Sümmerer K and Blank B 2000 Phys. Rev. C 61 034607
[49] Sümmerer K 2012 Phys. Rev. C 86 014601
       Sümmerer K 2013 Phys. Rev. C 87 039903
[50] Zhang X H et al 2012 Phys. Rev. C 85 024621
[51] Zhang X H 2013 Nucl. Phys. A 915 59
[52] Mocko M et al 2006 Phys. Rev. C 74 054612
[53] Rodrigues M R D et al 2013 Phys. Rev. C 88 034605
[54] Liu X et al 2014 Phys. Rev. C 90 014605
[55] Lin W et al 2014 Phys. Rev. C 89 021601(R)
[56] Mocko M et al 2008 Phys. Rev. C 78 024612
[57] Charity R J et al 1988 Nucl. Phys. A 483 371
[58] Cai X Z et al 1998 Phys. Rev. C 58 572
[59] Feng J et al 1993 Phys. Lett. B 305 9
[60] Ma C W et al 2010 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 37 015104
[61] Ma C W et al 2010 Phys. Rev. C 82 057602
[62] Tarasov O B et al 2013 Phys. Rev. C 87 054612
[63] Suzuki H et al 2013 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 317 756

Related articles from Frontiers Journals

[1]	M. S. El-Nagdy, A. Abdelsalam, B. M. Badawy, P. I. Zarubin, A. M. Abdalla, A. Saber. Features on Very Peripheral Collisions of $^{16}$O-Em at 3.7A GeV[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2018, 35(3): 072501
[2]	Jun-Sheng Li, Ying-Hua Dang, Dong-Hai Zhang, Jin-Xia Cheng, S. Kodaira, N. Yasuda. Charge-Changing Cross Sections of 736AMeV $^{28}$Si on Carbon Targets[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2017, 34(10): 072501
[3]	ZHANG Hong-Bin, ZHANG Xue-Ying, MA Fei, JU Yong-Qin, GE Hong-Lin, CHEN Liang, ZHANG Yan-Bin, WEI Ji-Fang, LI Yan-Yan, LUO Peng, WANG Jian-Guo, WAN Bo, XU Xiao-Wei, ZHOU Bin. Residual Nuclides Induced in Cu Target by a 250 MeV Proton Beam[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2015, 32(4): 072501
[4]	MA Chun-Wang, WANG Shan-Shan, WEI Hui-Ling, MA Yu-Gang. Re-examination of Finite-Size Effects in Isobaric Yield Ratios Using a Statistical Abrasion-Ablation Model[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2013, 30(5): 072501
[5]	WANG He, N. Aoi, S. Takeuchi, M. Matsushita, P. Doornenbal, T. Motobayashi, D. Steppenbeck, K. Yoneda, K. Kobayashi, J. Lee, LIU Hong-Na, Y. Kondo, R. Yokoyama, H. Sakurai, YE Yan-Lin. Observation of New Isotope ¹³¹Ag via the Two-Step Fragmentation Technique[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2013, 30(4): 072501
[6]	FANG De-Qing, MA Yu-Gang, CAI Xiang-Zhou, TIAN Wen-Dong, WANG Hong-Wei . Effects of Neutron Skin Thickness in Peripheral Nuclear Reactions**[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2011, 28(10): 072501
[7]	WANG Er-Qin, LIU Fu-Hu, Magda A. Rahim, S. Fakhraddin, SUN Jian-Xin, . Singly and Doubly Charged Projectile Fragments in Nucleus-Emulsion Collisions at Dubna Energy in the Framework of the Multi-Source Model**[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2011, 28(8): 072501
[8]	Prabir Kumar Haldar, Sanjib Kumar Manna . Factorial Correlators and Oscillatory Multiplicity Moments at the CERN SPS Energy for Ring-Like and Jet-Like Events**[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2011, 28(1): 072501
[9]	ZHAO Qiang, ZHANG Feng-Shou, , WANG Zhi-Ping, ZHOU Hong-Yu,. Secondary Beam Fragments Produced by 200 and 400MeV/u ¹²C⁶⁺ Ions in Water[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2009, 26(9): 072501
[10]	FU Yao, FANG De-Qing, MA Yu-Gang, CAI Xiang-Zhou, TIAN Wen-Dong, WANG Hong-Wei, GUO Wei. Isoscaling Behavior in ^48,40Ca+⁹Be Collisions at Intermediate Energy Investigated by the HIPSE Model[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2009, 26(8): 072501
[11]	G. Sher, M. I. Shahzad, M. A. Rana. Relativistic Energy Pb Projectile Fragmentation with Heavy Target Nuclei[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2009, 26(8): 072501
[12]	LI Jun-Sheng, ZHANG Dong-Hai, LI Hui-Ling, LIU Fu-Hu. Self-affine Multiplicity Fluctuation of Slow Particles in ¹⁶O-AgBr Collisions at 3.7 A GeV[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2009, 26(1): 072501
[13]	G. Sher, M. I. Shahzad, M. Hussain. Fragmentation Cross Sections of 158AGeV Pb Projectiles[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2007, 24(10): 072501
[14]	LI Jun-Sheng, LIU Fu-Hu, ZHANG Dong-Hai. Intermittency of Target Fragments in ¹⁶O--AgBr Collisions at 4.5A GeV/c[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2007, 24(10): 072501
[15]	Rajesh Kharab, Pardeep Singh, Ravinder Kumar. Effects of E2 and E1--E2 Interference on Coulomb Dissociation of ¹⁹C[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2007, 24(3): 072501

Viewed

Full text

Abstract