Asymmetric Decoy State Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Cryptographic Conferencing
Rui-Ke Chen1,2 , Wan-Su Bao1,2** , Hai-Ze Bao1,2 , Chun Zhou1,2 , Mu-Sheng Jiang1,2 , Hong-Wei Li1,2
1 Henan Key Laboratory of Quantum Information and Cryptography, Zhengzhou 4500012 Synergetic Innovation Center of Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026
Abstract ：Measurement-device-independent quantum cryptographic conferencing (MDI-QCC) protocol suggests an important scheme for practical multiparty quantum communication. As far as we know, MDI-QCC or MDI-quantum key distribution protocols always assume that the decoy state strategies used at each user's side are the same. In this study, to mitigate the system complexity and to improve the performance of MDI-QCC protocol in the finite-key case, we propose an asymmetric decoy state method for MDI-QCC protocol, and present security analysis and numerical simulations. From numerical simulations, our protocol can achieve better performance in the finite-key case. That is, with a finite data size of $10^{11}$, it can achieve nonzero secret key rate over 43.6 km.
收稿日期: 2017-03-22
出版日期: 2017-07-22
:
03.67.Dd
(Quantum cryptography and communication security)
03.67.Hk
(Quantum communication)
[1] Bennett C H and Brassard G 1984 Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Syst. Signal Process. p 175 [2] Yin Z Q, Han Z F, Chen W, Xu F X, Wu Q L and Guo G C 2008 Chin. Phys. Lett. 25 3547 [3] Huang D, Fang J, Wang C, Huang P and Zeng G H 2013 Chin. Phys. Lett. 30 114209 [4] Fang J, Huang P and Zeng G H 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 022315 [5] Wang S, Yin Z Q, Chen W et al 2015 Nat. Photon. 9 832 [6] Lo H K and Chau H F 1999 Science 283 2050 [7] Shor P W and Preskill J 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 441 [8] Lydersen L et al 2010 Nat. Photon. 4 686 [9] Li H W et al 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 062308 [10] Ma H X et al 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 080309 [11] Braunstein S L and Pirandola S 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 130502 [12] Lo H K, Curty M and Qi B 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 130503 [13] Hwang W Y 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 057901 [14] Wang X B 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 230503 [15] Lo H K, Ma X and Chen K 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 230504 [16] Ma X and Razavi M 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 062319 [17] Xu F, Curty M, Qi B and Lo H K 2013 New J. Phys. 15 113007 [18] Yin Z Q et al 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 062322 [19] Curty M, Xu F, Cui W, Lim C C W, Tamaki K and Lo H K 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 3732 [20] Xu F, Xu H and Lo H K 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 052333 [21] Zhou C, Bao W S, Zhang H L, Li H W, Wang Y, Li Y and Wang X 2015 Phys. Rev. A 91 022313 [22] Yu Z W, Zhou Y H and Wang X B 2015 Phys. Rev. A 91 032318 [23] Zhou Y H, Yu Z W and Wang X B 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 042324 [24] Rubenok A, Slater J A, Chan P, Lucio-Martinez I and Tittel W 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 130501 [25] Liu Y, Chen T Y, Wang L J, Liang H, Shentu G L, Wang J et al 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 130502 [26] Tang Z, Liao Z, Xu F, Qi B, Qian L and Lo H K 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 190503 [27] Tang Y L, Yin H L et al 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 190501 [28] Valivarthi R et al 2015 J. Mod. Opt. 62 1141 [29] Pirandola S et al 2015 Nat. Photon. 9 397 [30] Wang C et al 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 160502 [31] Comandar L et al 2016 Nat. Photon. 10 312 [32] Tang Y L et al 2016 Phys. Rev. X 6 011024 [33] Yin H L, Chen T Y, Yu Z W et al 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 190501 [34] Fu Y, Yin H L, Chen T Y and Chen Z B 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 090501 [35] Chen R K, Bao W S, Wang Y, Bao H Z, Zhou C and Li H W 2016 Opt. Express 24 6594 [36] Zhu C, Xu F and Pei C 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 17449
[1]
.
[2]
.
[3]
.
[4]
.
[5]
.
[6]
.
[7]
.
[8]
.
[9]
.
[10]
.
[11]
.
[12]
.
[13]
.
[14]
.
[15]
.
2017, Vol. 34 
