Thermoluminescence Kinetic Parameters of TLD-600 and TLD-700 after $^{252}$Cf Neutron+Gamma and $^{90}$Sr-$^{90}$Y Beta Radiations

doi:10.1088/0256-307X/34/1/017801

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (9)

全文: PDF (1273 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

Abstract：The thermoluminescent (TL) properties such as glow curve structure, relative thermoluminescence sensitivity, dose response linearity of lithium fluoride thermoluminescent dosimeters $^{6}$LiF:Ti,Mg (TLD-600) and $^{7}$LiF:Ti,Mg (TLD-700) are investigated after irradiation $^{252}$Cf neutron+gamma and $^{90}$Sr-$^{90}$Y beta sources at room temperature and then the obtained results are compared. The kinetic parameters, namely the order of kinetics $b$, activation energy $E_{\rm a}$ and the frequency factor $s$, are calculated using the computerized glow curve deconvolution (CGCD) program. The effect of heating rate on the glow curves of dosimeters is also investigated. The maximum TL peak intensities and the total area under the glow curves decrease with the increasing heating rate. There is no agreement with the kinetic parameters calculated by the CGCD program for both radiation sources.

收稿日期: 2016-07-15 出版日期: 2016-12-29

:	78.60.Kn	(Thermoluminescence)
	78.66.Sq	(Composite materials)

引用本文:

. [J]. 中国物理快报, 2017, 34(1): 17801-017801.
S. İflazoğlu, V. E. Kafadar, B. Yazici, A. N. Yazici. Thermoluminescence Kinetic Parameters of TLD-600 and TLD-700 after $^{252}$Cf Neutron+Gamma and $^{90}$Sr-$^{90}$Y Beta Radiations. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2017, 34(1): 17801-017801.

链接本文:

https://cpl.iphy.ac.cn/CN/10.1088/0256-307X/34/1/017801 或 https://cpl.iphy.ac.cn/CN/Y2017/V34/I1/17801

[1]	Kim J L, Lee J I, Chang I, Pradhan A S, Kim S I and Kim B H 2013 Radiat. Meas. 56 223
[2]	Bedogni R, Esposito A, Angelone M and Chiti M 2005 IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Conf. Record N p 14
[3]	Gambarını G and Sinha Roy M 1997 Appl. Radiat. Isot. 48 1467
[4]	Triolol A, Brail M, Marralel M, Gennarol G and Bartolotta A 2007 Radiat. Protection Dosimetry p 1
[5]	Lee J I, Pradhan A S, Kim J L, Kim B H and Yim K S 2008 J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 45 233
[6]	Triolo A, Marrale M and Brai M 2007 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 264 183
[7]	Youssian D and Horowitz Y S 1998 Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 77 151
[8]	Yasuda H and Fujitaka K 2000 Radiat. Meas. 32 355
[9]	Horowitz Y S and Shachart B B 1988 Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 23 401
[10]	Berger T and Hajek M 2008 Radiat. Meas. 43 1467
[11]	Strauss L and Hajek M Vienna University of Technology Atomic Institute of the Austrian Universities (Wien, Austria) www.ati.ac.at
[12]	Hiroshi Y 2000 Radioisotopes 49 260
[13]	Triolo A, Brai M, Marrale M, Gennaro G and Bartolotta A 2007 Radiat. Protection Dosimetry p 1
[14]	SNRS United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Protecting People and the Environment (nrc. gov)
[15]	Kumar M, Chourasiya G, Bhatt B C and Sunta C M 2010 J. Lumin. 130 1216
[16]	Yazıcı A N, Hacıibrahimoğlu M Y and Bedir M 2000 Turkish J. Phys. 24 623
[17]	Rasheedy M S and Zahran E M 2006 Inst. Phys. Publishing 73 98
[18]	Kadari A and Kadri D 2015 Arabian J. Chem. 8 798
[19]	Bos A J J, Piters J M, Gomez Ros J M and Delgado A 1993 (GLOCANIN Intercomparision Glow Curve Anal. Comput. Programs) IRI-CIEMAT Report 131-93-005 IRI Delft
[20]	Horowitz Y S and Yossian D 1995 Appl. ThermoLumin. Dosimetry Radiat. Prot. Dosim 60 1
[21]	Afouxenidis D, Polymeris G S, Tsirliganis N C and Kitis G 2012 Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 149 363
[22]	Kitis G, Carinou E and Askounis P 2012 Radiat. Meas. 47 258
[23]	Mathur V K 1983 Res. Technol. Department NSWC TR 83
[24]	Knoll F G 2000 Radiat. Detection Meas. 3rd edn (Birlin: John Wiley) chap 14
[25]	Mendez R, Iniguez M P, Barquero R, Mananes A, Gallego E, Lorente A and Voytchev M 2002 Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 98 173
[26]	Morehead F F and Daniels R 1957 J. Chem. Phys. 27 1318
[27]	Wingate C L 1951 Proc. Intern. Conf. Lumin. Dosimetry (Stanford) 42
[28]	Mukherjee B 1997 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 385 179
[29]	Yoo Y S, Kim P S and Moon P S 1975 J. Korean Nucl. Soc. 7 3