摘要Within the framework of a nonlinear chiral Lagrangian the mass spectra and the decay properties of 0++ states below 2GeV are studied. Assuming that f0(980), a0(980), K*0(1430), and f0(1500) comprise an SU(3) nonet, we make a detailed prediction about the static properties of the 0++ mesons. The substructure analysis of these states in terms of two- and four-quark components as well as a glueball component is carried out. We also consider the interaction Lagrangian and provide a preliminary study of the strong and radiative decays of the 0++ mesons. The scalar glueball masses and partial widths are also presented. In view of the fact that few data of 0++ mesons are clearly given in the present PDG (Particle Data Group) list and that the four-quark content of mesons is a hot issue both experimentally and theoretically, the predicted results of the paper may be helpful for upcoming experimental and theoretical studies of these mesons.
Abstract：Within the framework of a nonlinear chiral Lagrangian the mass spectra and the decay properties of 0++ states below 2GeV are studied. Assuming that f0(980), a0(980), K*0(1430), and f0(1500) comprise an SU(3) nonet, we make a detailed prediction about the static properties of the 0++ mesons. The substructure analysis of these states in terms of two- and four-quark components as well as a glueball component is carried out. We also consider the interaction Lagrangian and provide a preliminary study of the strong and radiative decays of the 0++ mesons. The scalar glueball masses and partial widths are also presented. In view of the fact that few data of 0++ mesons are clearly given in the present PDG (Particle Data Group) list and that the four-quark content of mesons is a hot issue both experimentally and theoretically, the predicted results of the paper may be helpful for upcoming experimental and theoretical studies of these mesons.
[1] Pennington M R 2006 Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 21 747 [2] Amsler C and Tornqvist N A 2004 Phys. Rep. 389 61 [3] Minkowski P and Ochs W 2003 Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 121 123 [4] Meissner U G 1991 Comm. Nucl. Part. Phys. 20 119 [5] Close F E and Tornqvist N A 2002 J. Phys. G 28 R249 [6] Minkowski P and Ochs W 1999 Eur. Phys. J. C 9 283 [7] Minkowski P and Ochs W 2006 AIP Conf. Proc. 814 52 [8] Jaffe R L 1977 Phys. Rev. D 15 267 [9] Napsuciale M and Rodriguez S 2004 Phys. Rev. D 70 094043 [10] Black D et al 2000 Phys. Rev. D 61 074001 [11] Abdel-Rehim A et al 2003 AIPConf. Proc. 687 51 Wang S J et al 2006 Chin. Phys.Lett. 23 1426 [12] Black D et al 1999 Phys. Rev. D 59 074026 Fariborz A H 2004 Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19 2095 [13] Callan C et al 1969 Phys.Rev. 177 2247 [14] Yao W M et al (PDG) 2006 J. Phys. G 33 1 [15] Bali G S 2004 Eur. Phys. J. A 19 1 [16] Forkel H 2005 Phys. Rev. D 71 054008 [17] Sexton J et al 1996 Nucl. Phys.Proc. Suppl. 47 128 [18] Achasov N N 2003 Nucl. Phys. A 728 425 [19] Harada M et al 1996 Phys. Rev. D 54 1991 [20] Barberis D et al 1999 Phys. Lett. B 462 462 [21] Black D et al 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88181603 [22] Minkowski P and Ochs W 2000 Phys. Lett. B 485 139 [23] Amsler C 1998 Rev. Mod. Phys. 70 1293 [24] Barberis D et al 2000 Phys. Lett. B 479 59
2007, Vol. 24 
