-
Abstract
Utilizing some conservation laws of the (1+1)-dimensional Camassa–Holm (CH) equation and/or its reciprocal forms, some (n+1)-dimensional CH equations for n ≥ 1 are constructed by a modified deformation algorithm. The Lax integrability can be proven by applying the same deformation algorithm to the Lax pair of the (1+1)-dimensional CH equation. A novel type of peakon solution is implicitly given and expressed by the LambertW function. -
There are many effective methods to simplify a complex system to a simple one, such as limiting method taking some arbitrary parameters to some special limits, and symmetric method reducing the dimension or order of differential equations. It is much more difficult to explore the laws of complex systems from results of a simple system. Fortunately, in many cases, it is also possible to transform results of a simple system into a complex system. For instance, we can deform some particular solutions of the sine-Gordon equation (integrable only for
D = 1)□ϕ=m1sinϕ,□≡∂2t−D∑i=1∂2xi 1 ,2 ]□ϕ=m1sinϕ+m2sin(2ϕ). 3 ]Recently, in order to obtain more high-dimensional integrable systems in some traditional integrable meanings, we proposed a deformation algorithm, which enables arbitrary lower-dimensional integrable systems to be deformed to high-dimensional ones.[4]
Deformation Algorithm. For a general (1+1)-dimensional integrable local evolution systemut=F(u,ux,…,uxn),uxn=∂nxu,u=(u1,u2,…,um), (1) ρit=Jix,i=1,2,…,D−1,ρi=ρi(u),Ji=Ji(u,ux,…,uxN), (2) ρi are dependent only on the fieldu while the flowsJi can be field derivative dependent, then the deformed (D +1)-dimensional systemˆTu=F(u,ˆLu,…,ˆLnu) (3) ˆL≡∂x+D−1∑i=1ρi∂xi,ˆT≡∂t+D−1∑i=1ˉJi∂xi (4) ˉJi=Ji|uxj→ˆLju,j=1,2,…,N. 4 ] for almost all the known local integrable evolution systems. In fact, the conjecture has been proved by Dan-da Zhang and Casati at Ningbo University (private communication).In theoretical physics, to find some completely integrable models themselves is physically significant even if they are not directly derived from physical systems. For instance, the nonlocal nonlinear Schrödinger equation proposed by Ablowitz and Musslimani in Ref. [5] was not derived from real physical problems but proposed only for integrability. Now, the study on nonlocal integrable systems has become a hot topic related to multiplace physics.[6] In Ref. [4], we specifically found higher-dimensional deformations from the (1+1)-dimensional KdV equation and the (1+1)-dimensional Ablowitz–Kaup–Newell–Segue (AKNS) system. It is found that the new high-dimensional integrable systems obtained from the deformation algorithm possess completely different structures and properties from the traditional integrable system. Although the new models possess elegant properties such as the existence of the Lax pair and the infinitely many symmetries, the traditional research methods of integrable systems can no longer be successfully applied because the original models and their several reciprocal systems are included in the same models.
The Camassa–Holm (CH) equationmt+2mux+umx=0,m≡u−uxx, (5) ut=(uxt+uuxx+12u2x−32u2)x, (6) 7 ] As an integrable model, Eq. (6 ) appeared earlier in a list by Fuchssteiner and Fokas.[8 ] The CH equation also arises in the investigation of propagation of axially symmetric waves in hyper-elastic rods[9 ,10 ] and its high-frequency limit models nematic liquid crystals.[11 ,12 ] Because the CH equation can be applicable in various physical fields, to find higher-dimensional integrable CH systems may be useful in these related higher-dimensional physical problems.It is clear that the deformation algorithm requires that the lower-dimensional equation should be a local evolution form and the conserved density should be field derivative independent. The CH Eq. (6) does not satisfy these conditions. In this Letter, we try to deform the CH Eq. (6) to higher-dimensional ones by modifying the deformation algorithm of Ref. [4].
Modified Deformation Algorithm. For a general (1+1)-dimensional integrable systemF(u,ux,ut,…,uxn,tp)=0,uxn,tp=∂nx∂ptu,u=(u1,u2,…,um), (7) ρit=Jix,i=1,2,…,D−1,ρi=ρi(u,ux,…,uxk,tq),Ji=Ji(u,ux,…,uxN,tM), (8) D +1)-dimensional systemF(u,ˆLu,ˆTu,…,ˆLnˆTpu)=0,ρi=ρi(u,ˆLu,…,ˆLkˆTqu),Ji=Ji(u,ˆLu,…,ˆLNˆTMu), (9) ˆL≡∂x+D−1∑i=1ρi∂xi,ˆT≡∂t+D−1∑i=1Ji∂xi. (10) The (2+1)-Dimensional CH Equation and Its Lax Integrability. From the CH Eq. (6 ), we know thatu is a conserved density with conserved flowJ1=uxt+uuxx+12u2x−32u2 . Thus, applying the modified deformation algorithm to the CH Eq. (6 ), we obtain a (2+1)-dimensional CH equation in the formˆT1u=ˆL1J,J=ˆL1ˆT1u+uˆL21u+12(ˆL1u)2−32u2,ˆL1≡∂x+u∂y,ˆT1≡∂t+J∂y, (11) ut=Jx+uJy−Juy,J=(∂x+u∂y)(∂t+J∂y)u+u(∂x+u∂y)2u+12(ux+uuy)2−32u2. (12) ˆL1 ,∼L1=−∂x−∂yu , the (2+1)-dimensional CH Eq. (12 ) can be equivalently rewritten asut=ˆL1J−Juy,ˆL1=∂x+u∂y,∼L1=−∂x−∂yu,∼L1ut+J(1+∼L1uy)+u∼L1ux+u2∼L1uy+12ux∼L1u−12u2(u2y−3)=0. (13) It is known that the CH Eq. (6 ) is Lax integrable with (weak) Lax pair,Mψ=0,M≡∂2x−14(4λm+1),m=u−uxx,Nψ=0,N≡∂t−12(λ−1−2u)∂x−12ux. (14) ψxxt=ψtxx|{Mψ=0,Nψ=0}, [M,N]ψ|{Mψ=0,Nψ=0}=(MN−NM)ψ|{Mψ=0,Nψ=0}=0 6 ). It should be mentioned that [M ,N ] = 0 does not lead to the CH Eq. (6 ), which means (14 ) is a weak Lax pair of the CH Eq. (6 ) but not a strong Lax pair.To prove the Lax integrability of the (2+1)-dimensional CH Eq. (12 ), we can directly apply the deformation algorithm to the Lax pair (14 ) of the usual CH Eq. (6 ). The result readsˆMψ=0,ˆM≡(∂x+u∂y)2−14(4λm+1),m=u−(∂x+u∂y)2u,ˆNψ=0,ˆN≡∂t+J∂y−12(λ−1−2u)(∂x+u∂y)−12(ux+uuy). (15) [ˆM,ˆN]=0 cannot yield the (2+1)-dimensional CH Eq. (12 ). However, the weak condition[ˆM,ˆN]ψ|{ˆMψ=0,ˆNψ=0}=0 12 ).The (1+1)-Dimensional Reciprocal CH Equation and Its (2+1)-Dimensional Deformation. It is clear that the original (1+1)-dimensional CH equation is still a special reduction of the (2+1)-dimensional CH equation. It is interesting that the (2+1)-dimensional CH Eq. (12 ) contains its (1+1)-dimensional reciprocal formut=uJy−Juy,J=u(uJy)y+u2(uuy)y+12u2u2y−32u2, (16) (uψy)y−14{4λ[1−(uuy)y]+u−1}ψ=0,ψt+Jψy−12(λ−1−2u)(ψx+uψy)−12(ux+uuy)ψ=0. (17) 16 ) possesses the conservation law(u−1)=−(Ju−1)y. (18) 16 ) with the help of the conservation law we can reachˆT2u=uˆL2J−J^L2u,ˆL2≡∂y+u−1∂x,ˆT2≡∂t−u−1J∂x,J=uˆL2(uˆL2J)+u2ˆL2(uˆL2u)+12u2(ˆL2u)2−32u2. (19) 11 ) and (19 ) are completely same as (12 ).Traveling Wave Solutions of (2+1)-Dimensional CH Eq. ( and a New Type of Peakon Solution. It is well known that the (1+1)-dimensional CH Eq. (12 )6 ) possesses a peakon solution. Now, it is interesting for us to know if there is a possible peakon solution for the (2+1)-dimensional CH Eq. (13 ). One can prove that the travelling wave solutions of Eq. (13 ) can be written asJ=−c1u+C,C=−(c1k1+ω)k−12, (20) u=U(X),X=k1x+k2y+ωt, (21) 2(U−c1)(k1+k2U+k1)2UXX+(k1+k2U)⋅(3k2U−2c1k2+k1)U2X+2c1U−2C−3U2=0, (22) c 1,k 1,k 2 andω are arbitrary constants.The general solution of Eq. (22 ) can be expressed by the following elliptic integral∫U(k1+k2θ)√θ−c1dθ√θ3−c1θ2+2Cθ+c2=±(X−X0) (23) c 2 andX 0.It is interesting that the traveling wave Eq. (22 ) allows a weak solution, a completely new type of peakon solutionu=k1k2LambertW(η),η=k2k1exp(−|X−X0k1|) (24) C = 0. The LamberW function in the peakon solution is defined as the principle branch ofLambertW(η)exp[LambertW(η)]=η. (25) 1 displays the peakon structure of Eq. (24 ) with the fixed parametersk 1 = 1,k 2 = 0.5 andX 0 = 0.Fig. Fig. 1. Peakon solution (24) of the (2+1)-dimensional CH equation with the parameter selections k1 = 1, k2 = 0.5 and X0 = 0.The (4+1)-Dimensional CH Equation and Its Lower-Dimensional Reductions. For the CH Eq. (6 ), there are infinitely many conservation laws, three of them readρit=Jix, (26) ρ1=u,J1=uxt+uuxx+12u2x−32u2, (27) ρ2=u2−u2x,J2=2u2uxx+2uuxt−2u3, (28) ρ23=u−uxx,J3=−uρ3. (29) 26 )–(29 ) to the (1+1)-dimensional CH Eq. (6 ), we obtain an integrable (4+1)-dimensional CH system,ut=J1x+uJ1y+ρ2J1z+ρ3J1ξ−J1uy−J2uz+uρ3uξ,J1=ˆLˆTu+uˆL2u+12(ˆLu)2−32u2,ρ2=u2−(ˆLu)2,J2=2u2ˆL2u+2uˆLˆTu−2u3,ρ23=u−ˆL2u, (30) ˆL=∂x+u∂y+ρ2∂z+ρ3∂ξ,ˆT=∂t+J1∂y+J2∂z−uρ3∂ξ. (31) 30 ) possesses the formˉMψ=0,ˉNψ=0 (32) ˉM≡(∂x+u∂y+ρ2∂z+ρ3∂ξ)2−14(4λm+1),m=u−(∂x+u∂y+ρ2∂z+ρ3∂ξ)2u,ˉN≡∂t+J1∂y+J2∂z−uρ3∂ξ−12(λ−1−2u)⋅(∂x+u∂y+ρ2∂z+ρ3∂ξ)−12(ux+uuy+ρ2uz+ρ3uξ). (33) [ˉM,ˉN]ψ|{ˉMψ=0,ˉNψ=0}=0 30 ) in the form (ρ 1 ≡u ,J 3 ≡ –uρ 3),ρit+J1ρiy+J2ρiz−uρ3ρiξ=Jix+uJiy+ρ2Jiz+ρ3Jiξ,i=1,2,3,mt+J1my+J2mz−uρ3mξ+2m(ux+uuy+ρ2uz+ρ3uξ)+u(mx+umy+ρ2mz+ρ3mξ)=0,m=u−(∂x+u∂y+ρ2∂z+ρ3∂ξ)2u. (34) 34 ) is an undetermined system because there are only five equations for six independent variablesρ 1 =u ,ρ 2,ρ 3,J 1,J 2, andm . In the situation, the weak Lax pairs lead to undetermined integrable systems, appeared in many cases. For instance, motivated by a class of infinitesimal Bäcklund transformations originally introduced in a gas dynamics context by Loewner in 1952, Konopelchenko and Rogers (LKR) were led to construct an undetermined master (2+1)-dimensional soliton system[13 –15 ] with only seven equations but with eight arbitrary matrix functions. The comprehensive nature of the latter is made evident by the fact that hierarchies of such so-called undetermined LKR systems have been shown to be compatible with generic multi-component Kadomtsev–Petviashvili and modified Kadomtsev–Petviashvili hierarchies.[16 ] Notable reductions of the LKR system include integrable (2+1)-dimensional versions of the sine-Gordon equation,[17 ] the principal chiral field model, the Bruschi–Ragnisco system[18 ] as well as Ernst–Weyl type equations.[19 ]The system (34 ) is equivalent to Eq. (30 ) only for an additional condition, say,J1=ˆL2J1+uˆL2u+12(ˆLu)2−32u2, (35) 34 ), whereˆL is defined in (31 ).The (4+1)-dimensional CH system (30) and/or its equivalent form (34) with (35) is quite complicated in its expanded form. Here, we just list some special reductions.
In addition to the usual (1+1)-dimensional CH Eq. (6) [(30) with uy = uz = uξ = 0], the first type of reciprocal CH Eq. (16) [(30) with ux = uz = uξ = 0] and the (2+1)-dimensional CH Eq. (12) [(30) with uz = uξ = 0], there are some other (n+1)-dimensional integrable reductions for n = 1, 2, and 3.
The second type of the (1+1)-dimensional reciprocal CH equation can be obtained by requiring the model (30 ) to be onlyz dependent,ut=ρ2J1z−u(ρ2+2J1)uz,(uρ32uzz+2u4−u2ρ2−32ρ22)J1+12ρ32uzt+uρ42uzz+uρ32uzρ2z+uuzutρ22+14ρ2(2u2+ρ2)(2u2−3ρ2)=0,ρ2=u2−ρ22u2z. (36) ξ dependent, then the third type of the (1+1)-dimensional reciprocal CH equation can be read off from (30 ),ut=ρ3ρ3ξuξt+ρ23uξξt+ρ3uξ(ρ23−3u),ρ23=u−ρ23uξξ−ρ3ρ3ξuξ. (37) 12 ), one can find at least other five (2+1)-dimensional integrable reduction systems from (30 ) in the spacetime {x ,z ,t }, {x ,ξ ,t }, {y ,z ,t }, {y ,ξ ,t }, and {z ,ξ ,t }, respectively. Here, we write down only a relatively simple one in the spacetime {x ,ξ ,t },ut=ρ3uuξ+J1x+ρ3J1ξ,J1=12u2x−32u2+uuxx+uxt−12ρ23u2ξ+ρ3uuxξ+ρ3uξt,ρ23=u−uxx−2ρ3uxξ−ρ23uξξ−ρ3xuξ−ρ3ρ3ξuξ. (38) 30 ) in the spacetime {x ,y ,z ,t }, {x ,y ,ξ ,t }, {x ,z ,ξ ,t }, and {y ,z ,ξ ,t }, respectively. Here is the concrete form of one of them,ut=J1x+uJ1y−J1uy+ρ3uuξ+ρ3J1ξ,J1=(∂x+u∂y+ρ3∂ξ)2J1+(∂x+u∂y+ρ3∂ξ)2u+12(ux+uuy+ρ3uξ)2−32u2,ρ23=u−(∂x+u∂y+ρ3∂ξ)2u. (39) In summary, by means of the conservation laws of the (1+1)-dimensional CH equation, and/or its (1+1)-dimensional reciprocal CH equations, one can find various (n+1)-dimensional integrable CH systems with the help of the modified deformation algorithm. Applying the deformation algorithm to weak Lax pairs of the (1+1)-dimensional CH and/or reciprocal CH equation, one can get some undetermined integrable systems. To obtain determined integrable systems, one must deform strong Lax pairs or add some reasonable auxiliary conditions on the deformed weak Lax pairs.
The same idea can be applied to other peakon systems such as the Degasperis–Procesi equation, the Novikov equation, and the Fokas–Olver–Rosenau–Qiao equation.[20] In principle, the present deformation idea may be applied in differential-difference equations like the models discussed in literature.[21,22] However, the deformation algorithm should be modified and we have not yet found appropriate deformation algorithm for the discrete variables.
Because the original (1+1)-dimensional integrable systems and their several reciprocal forms are included in the same higher-dimensional models, to find some exact solutions of the higher-dimensional integrable systems of this study and those in Ref. [4] is quite difficult although the models are Lax and symmetry integrable. There are many papers and methods to find exact solutions for traditional lower- and higher-dimensional integrable and nonintegrable models.[23,24] However, these methods are difficult to directly apply to the deformed systems. For instance, the methods, e.g., in Ref. [23] based on Hirota’s bilinear form, cannot be applied because there is no bilinear form for the deformed systems. In this study, only the travelling wave solutions of the (2+1)-dimensional CH Eq. (12) are obtained via a complicated elliptic integral. It is interesting that a completely new type of peakon solution (24) is described by the implicit LambertW function.
From the (1+1)-dimensional CH Eq. (5 ), one can see that a solution of the linear equationm=u−uxx=0 (40) 5 ). The usual single peakon solution of the CH equationu=c1exp(−|x−c2t−x0|) (41) 40 ). As one of special local waves, peakon, in nonlinear systems, it is more reasonable to find some models where the peakons are really a solution of a nonlinear equation. The peakon solution provided in this study may be the first significant example.Acknowledgement: The authors would like to thank X. B. Hu, Q. P. Liu and Z. J. Qiao for their valuable discussions. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12235007, 11975131, 11435005, and 12275144). -
References
[1] Lou S Y, Ni G J 1989 Phys. Lett. A 140 33 doi: 10.1016/0375-96018990542-2[2] Hu H C, Lou S Y, Chow K W 2007 Chaos Solitons Fractals 31 1213 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2005.10.066[3] Lou S Y 1997 J. Phys. A 30 7259 doi: 10.1088/0305-4470/30/20/024[4] Lou S Y, Hao X Z, Jia M 2022 arXiv:2211.06844 [nlin.SI][5] Ablowitz M J, Musslimani Z H 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 064105 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.064105[6] Lou S Y 2018 J. Math. Phys. 59 083507 doi: 10.1063/1.5051989[7] Camassa R, Holm D D 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 1661 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1661[8] Fuchssteiner B, Fokas A 1981 Physica D 4 47 doi: 10.1016/0167-27898190004-X[9] Constantin A, Strauss W 2000 Phys. Lett. A 270 140 doi: 10.1016/S0375-96010000255-3[10] Dai H H 1998 Acta Mech. 127 193 doi: 10.1007/BF01170373[11] Hunter J K, Saxton R 1991 SIAM J. Appl. Math. 51 1498 doi: 10.1137/0151075[12] Bressan A, Constantin A 2005 SIAM J. Math. Anal. 37 996 doi: 10.1137/050623036[13] Loewner C 1952 J. Anal. Math. 2 219 doi: 10.1007/BF02825638[14] Konopelchenko B, Rogers C 1991 Phys. Lett. A 158 391 doi: 10.1016/0375-96019190680-7[15] Lou S Y, Rogers C, Schief W K 2003 J. Math. Phys. 44 5869 doi: 10.1063/1.1625077[16] Oevel W, Schief W K 1994 Rev. Math. Phys. 6 1301 doi: 10.1142/S0129055X94000468[17] Lou S Y 2003 J. Phys. A 36 3877 doi: 10.1088/0305-4470/36/13/317[18] Konopelchenko B G, Rogers C 1993 J. Math. Phys. 34 214 doi: 10.1063/1.530377[19] Schief W K 1994 Proc. R. Soc. London A 446 381 doi: 10.1098/rspa.1994.0110[20] Lou S Y, Qiao Z J 2017 Chin. Phys. Lett. 34 100201 doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/34/10/100201[21] Zhang D J, Chen D Y 2002 Chaos Solitons Fractals 14 573 doi: 10.1016/S0960-07790100238-7[22] Wang D S, Li Q, Wen X Y, Liu L 2020 Rep. Math. Phys. 86 325 doi: 10.1016/S0034-48772030087-2[23] Lü X, Ma W X 2016 Nonlinear Dyn. 85 1217 doi: 10.1007/s11071-016-2755-8[24] Wang D S, Guo B L, Wang X L 2019 J. Diff. Eqn. 266 5209 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2018.10.053 -
Related Articles
-
Cited by
Periodical cited type(18)
1. Cheng, X., Huang, Q. HIGHER DIMENSIONAL INTEGRABLE DEFORMATIONS OF A GENERALIZED HIROTA-SATSUMA COUPLED KORTEWEG-DE VRIES SYSTEM. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - Series S, 2025, 18(4): 1006-1023. DOI:10.3934/dcdss.2024129 2. Cheng, X., Jin, G., Wang, J. Multiple Lax integrable higher dimensional AKNS(-1) equations and sine-Gordon equations. Chaos, 2024, 34(10): 103102. DOI:10.1063/5.0223870 3. Lan, Z.-Z.. Multiple Soliton Asymptotics in a Spin-1 Bose-Einstein Condensate. Chinese Physics Letters, 2024, 41(9): 090501. DOI:10.1088/0256-307X/41/9/090501 4. Meng, Y., Fang, P.-P., Lin, J. Nondegenerate Soliton Solutions of (2+1)-Dimensional Multi-Component Maccari System. Chinese Physics Letters, 2024, 41(6): 060501. DOI:10.1088/0256-307X/41/6/060501 5. Cheng, X., Huang, Q. Higher-dimensional integrable deformations of the classical Boussinesq-Burgers system. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 2024, 76(6): 065001. DOI:10.1088/1572-9494/ad3546 6. Roshid, M.M., Alam, M.N., İlhan, O.A. et al. Modulation instability and comparative observation of the effect of fractional parameters on new optical soliton solutions of the paraxial wave model. Optical and Quantum Electronics, 2024, 56(6): 1010. DOI:10.1007/s11082-024-06921-7 7. Lan, Z.-Z.. Multi-soliton solutions, breather-like and bound-state solitons for complex modified Korteweg-de Vries equation in optical fibers. Chinese Physics B, 2024, 33(6): 060201. DOI:10.1088/1674-1056/ad39d7 8. Han, Q.-H., Jia, M. Higher-dimensional Chen-Lee-Liu equation and asymmetric peakon soliton. Chinese Physics B, 2024, 33(4): 040202. DOI:10.1088/1674-1056/ad1822 9. Jin, M., Yang, J., Xin, X. Nonlocal symmetries and solutions of the multi-dimensional integrable long water wave equations. Physica Scripta, 2024, 99(4): 045249. DOI:10.1088/1402-4896/ad3382 10. Chen, G.-H., Wang, H.-C., Deng, H.-M. et al. Vortex Quantum Droplets under Competing Nonlinearities. Chinese Physics Letters, 2024, 41(2): 020501. DOI:10.1088/0256-307X/41/2/020501 11. Xin, X., Jin, M., Yang, J. et al. Nonlocal symmetries and solutions of the (2+1) dimension integrable Burgers equation. Applied Mathematics Letters, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.aml.2023.108867 12. Zhu, D., Zhu, X. Multi-Pseudo Peakons in the b-Family Fifth-Order Camassa-Holm Model. Chinese Physics Letters, 2023, 40(12): 120202. DOI:10.1088/0256-307X/40/12/120202 13. Casati, M., Zhang, D. Multidimensional integrable deformations of integrable PDEs. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 2023, 50(505701): 505701. DOI:10.1088/1751-8121/ad0ac8 14. Du, W.-D., Kong, D.-X., Lou, S.Y. From decoupled integrable models to coupled ones via a deformation algorithm. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 2023, 75(10): 105004. DOI:10.1088/1572-9494/acf2f5 15. Wang, F.-R., Lou, S.Y. Higher dimensional Degasperis–Procesi–Camassa–Holm systems. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 2023. DOI:10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113867 16. Jia, M., Lou, S.Y. A novel (2+1)-dimensional nonlinear Schördinger equation deformed from (1+1)-dimensional nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Applied Mathematics Letters, 2023. DOI:10.1016/j.aml.2023.108684 17. Zhu, S.-Y., Kong, D.-X., Lou, S.-Y. Dark Korteweg-De Vrise System and Its Higher-Dimensional Deformations. Chinese Physics Letters, 2023, 40(8): 080201. DOI:10.1088/0256-307X/40/8/080201 18. Hao, X., Lou, S.Y. Higher-dimensional integrable deformations of the modified KdV equation. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 2023, 75(7): 075002. DOI:10.1088/1572-9494/acd99c Other cited types(0)