Typesetting math: 100%
Express Letter

Superconductivity above 30K Achieved in Dense Scandium

    Show all affliationsShow less
  • Superconductivity is one of most intriguing quantum phenomena, and the quest for elemental superconductors with high critical temperature (Tc) is of great scientific significance due to their relatively simple material composition and the underlying mechanism. Here we report the experimental discovery of densely compressed scandium (Sc) becoming the first elemental superconductor with Tc breaking into 30 K range, which is comparable to the Tc values of the classic La–Ba–Cu–O or LaFeAsO superconductors. Our results show that Tconset of Sc increases from ∼ 3 K at around 43 GPa to ∼ 32 K at about 283 GPa (Tczero31 K), which is well above liquid neon temperature. Interestingly, measured Tc shows no sign of saturation up to the maximum pressure achieved in our experiments, indicating that Tc may be even higher upon further compression.
  • Article Text

  • Searching for high Tc superconductors is one of most important research topics in physical sciences. Elemental superconductors attract special and growing attention due to the simplicity of their singular composition.[1,2] About 20 elemental solids are known to show superconductivity at ambient pressure, of which niobium has the highest superconducting transition temperature Tc ∼ 9.2 K[1] and its alloy NbTi has been widely used for its excellent superconducting performance.[3] High pressure is a powerful tool and has been playing an important role in exploring new elemental superconductors and tuning superconducting properties.[2] For simple elemental metals, high pressure usually suppresses Tc because of the electronic band broadening and resulting reduction of the density of states near the Fermi energy. Lattice stiffness is another important factor that Tc goes down under pressure. However, these pressure effects on superconductivity may be altered by subtle structural and electronic changes associated with bonding or phase transitions. Pressure may also enable non-superconducting metals or even insulating solids at ambient pressure to host superconductivity at high pressure. For example, calcium is non-superconducting at ambient pressure, but exhibits a high Tc of 25 K at 161 GPa,[4] and insulating sulfur shows superconductivity with Tc ∼ 17 K at 200 GPa.[5] All known elemental superconductors with Tc near or above 20 K are realized under pressure, such as Li with Tc ∼ 16–20 K at 43–48 GPa[6,7] and yttrium with Tc ∼ 17 K at 89 GPa.[8] Our recent study showed that elemental titanium can reach Tc of 26.2 K at pressure of 248 GPa.[9]

    It is indicated that both Ca and Ti show very high Tc among elemental solids because of the pressure induced sd electron transition, which also drives a sequence of phase transitions.[4,914] The structure instability associated with the pressure induced tendency and occurrence of phase transitions favors superconductivity because of the lattice softening enhanced electron-phonon coupling strength.[9] The crystal structure and physical properties of Sc metal under pressure were examined in previous studies,[1524] which showed that Sc has the hcp structure (Sc I) under ambient conditions, and pressure generates four structural transitions at about 23, 104, 140, and 240 GPa, respectively, producing high-pressure phases of Sc II, Sc III, Sc IV, and Sc V, respectively.[1719] Sc II phase crystallizes in an incommensurate composite structure comprising a body centered host structure and a C face centered guest structure,[18] and Sc V phase has a hexagonal lattice consisting of six screw helical chains,[17] while Sc III and Sc IV phases are not fully determined.[19]

    Previous work reported that Sc starts to show superconductivity at 21 GPa with Tc ∼ 0.35 K.[21] With further compression, Tc reaches as high as 19.6 K at 107 GPa, which occurs just at the phase boundary of Sc II and Sc III. However, Tc was reported to drop to ∼ 10 K when pressure is further increased and Sc III phase appears.[20] Here, we report high-pressure measurements up to 283 GPa to explore superconductivity in Sc. A maximal Tc above 30 K was observed at the highest experimental pressure, which sets a new record among elemental superconductors. To date, Sc is the only known elemental superconductor with Tc breaking into 30 K temperature range.

    Experimental. The electrical resistance measurements were performed by using the four probe van der Pauw method for tiny specimen as described in the literature.[25,26] The pressure was calibrated via the shift of the first order Raman edge frequency from the diamond cutlet as shown in the previous reports.[9,27,28] The applied current is 100 μA. Diamond anvil cells were used to produce high pressures. A variant of anvils with double beveled culet size of 20/140/300 μm, 30/140/300 μm, or 50/140/300 μm were adopted in the experiments. A plate of T301 stainless steel covered with mixture of c-BN powder and epoxy as insulating layer was used as the gasket. A hole of approximately 15 ∼ 30 μm in diameter depending on top culet size was drilled in the center of the gasket to serve as high pressure chamber. Also, h-BN powder was used as pressure transmitting medium that filled the high pressure chamber. We used the ATHENA procedure to produce the specimen assembly.[26] Four Pt foils with thickness of approximately 0.5 μm as the inner electrode were deposited on the culet surface, after which cross shaped Sc specimens with side lengths ∼ 10 μm × 10 μm and thickness of 1 μm were adhered on the electrodes and culet surface. Tens of specimens are prepared for the experiments. Diamond anvil cells were put into a MagLab system that provides synergetic extreme environments with temperatures from 300 to 1.5 K and magnetic fields up to 9 T for the transport measurements.

    Results and Discussion. Figure 1(a) shows the temperature dependence of electrical resistance at high pressure up to 215 GPa measured during the warming process for Sc sample 1. The Sc metal starts to show superconductivity with Tc above 3.3 K at 43 GPa. The Tc monotonously rises to ∼ 26.2 K at 215 GPa, which is much higher than the 8.2 K at 74 GPa reported by Hamlin et al.[22] and 19.6 K at 107 GPa reported by Debessai et al.[20] Considering that Tc shows an increasing tendency with further compression, we extended to higher pressures up to 283 GPa for sample 2 and observed enhancement of Tc in dense Sc metal. Temperature dependence of the electrical resistance for sample 2 under various pressures are shown in Fig. 1(b). With further increasing pressure, Tc reaches 32 K at the maximum experimental pressure of 283 GPa as shown in Fig. 2, where both cooling and warming curves are presented. It is evidenced in the experiments that cooling process usually gave rather higher transition temperature since it is not easy to reach thermal equilibrium with helium cooling rate. Alternatively the warming process can be subtly tuned to reach thermal equilibrium that approaches the intrinsic properties of the measured samples. We hence chose the Tc measured from warming process. For the warming process the onset critical temperature (Tconset) and the zero resistance critical temperature (Tczero) of superconducting transition at 283 GPa can be determined by the derivative of resistance with respect to temperature, i.e., dR/dT, to be 32 K and 31 K, respectively, demonstrating a very narrow superconducting transition. The data for samples 3 and 4 shown by Figs. S1(a) and S1(b) in the Supplementary Materials further confirm the superconductivity of Sc under high pressure with Tc above 30 K.

    Fig. Fig. 1.  Temperature dependence of the electrical resistance of elemental Sc metal measured at high pressures for (a) sample 1 and (b) sample 2.
    Fig. Fig. 2.  The resistance curves measured at 283 GPa in both cooling and warming processes, where the derivative of the resistance with respect to temperature, dR/dT, for the warming process is plotted to clearly show the Tconset and Tczero.

    Among elemental superconductors, niobium has the highest Tc of 9.2 K at ambient pressure, while under high pressure several elements exhibit high Tc near or above 20 K, such as Li (Tc ∼ 15–20 K at 48 GPa[6,7]), Ca (Tc ∼ 25 K at 220 GPa[4]), Y (Tc ∼ 20 K near 100 GPa[8]), V (Tc ∼ 17 K at 120 GPa[29]), S (Tc ∼ 17 K at 220 GPa[5]), and Ti (Tc ∼ 26.2 K near 248 GPa[9]). Superconductivity above 30 K in elemental solids has never been reported before, and Sc is the first and so far only known elemental superconductor with Tc breaking into the record-setting 30 K range, which is comparable to the Tc of the classic LaBaCuO[30] and LaFeAsO superconductors.[31]

    To further probe superconductivity of dense Sc metal under high pressure, we measured transport properties under different magnetic fields for sample 2. Figure 3(a) presents the electrical resistance measured at 283 GPa with applying magnetic fields. It is seen that the superconducting transitions are gradually suppressed by the magnetic field. Here, the temperature at 90% of normal state resistance was used to plot the data of Tc90% versus magnetic field measured at 283 GPa as shown in Fig. 3(b), from which the upper critical field at zero temperature μ0Hc2(0) can be estimated. A linear fitting of Hc2(T) leads to the slope of dHc2/dT|Tc of −2.65 T/K. Using the Werthamer–Helfand–Hohenberg (WHH) formula of μ0Hc2(T) = −0.69 × [dHc2/dT|Tc] × Tc, the μ0Hc2(0) value controlled by orbital depairing mechanism in a dirty limit [μ0Hc2orb(0)] was calculated to be 58 T. The Ginzburg–Landau (GL) formula of μ0Hc2(T) = μ0Hc2(0) × [1−(T/Tc)2] is also used to estimate the upper critical field at zero temperature. As shown in Fig. 3(b), the fitting of μ0Hc2(T) by the GL formula gives a value of Hc2(0) = 43.7 T, which is slightly smaller than μ0Hc2orb(0). Using the obtained value of Hc2(0), the GL coherence length was calculated to be ξ = 27.4 Å via μ0Hc2(0) = Φ0/2πξ2, where Φ0 = 2.067 × 10−15 Web is the magnetic flux quantum.

    Fig. Fig. 3.  (a) Temperature dependence of the electrical resistance of Sc metal measured at different magnetic fields under fixed pressure of 283 GPa. The dashed line marks the 90% of the normal state resistance. (b) Upper critical field μ0Hc2 versus temperature at 283 GPa. The Ginzburg–Landau (GL) fit for the Hc2 (T) is shown by the solid lines. The star symbol represents the Hc2 (0) values calculated via the Werthamer–Helfand–Hohenberg (WHH) model.

    Combining our high-pressure x-ray experiments (Fig. S2) and the phase transition behaviors reported previously,[1719] we plot the pressure-driven structure-superconductivity phase diagram as shown in Fig. 4. Five different crystal structures of Sc are identified when pressure varies from ambient pressure to 297 GPa. No superconductivity above 2 K was observed in Sc I within the pressure range 0–23 GPa. With increasing pressure, Tc monotonously rises from 3.1 K at 43 GPa to 32 K at 283 GPa as shown by the data of thin foil samples 1–4. One remarkable interesting feature is the pressure dependence of Tc, showing non-saturating behavior, which suggests that Tc could be further enhanced by further compression under higher-pressure conditions. We note that the monotonous rise of Tc is different from the previous work reported by Debessai et al.,[20] where an abrupt Tc drop is found at 111 GPa that is near the boundary between the Sc II and Sc III phases. To double check this discrepancy, one additional high-pressure transport measurement was performed on powder Sc sample instead of thin film. As shown in Figs. S1(c) and S1(d), at 102 GPa there exist two superconducting transitions at 17.5 K and 14 K, respectively. With further increasing pressure, the low-Tc transition gradually shifts toward high temperature while the high Tc transition disappears, which implies that there does exist a phase transition near 102 GPa. The low-Tc superconductivity should arise from the Sc III phase, which is consistent with the Tc drop near the phase transition reported in the previous work.[20] Except for the data in the Sc II phase in the range 82–102 GPa, the pressure dependences of Tc for the thin film and powder samples are well matched. Sc II phase adopts an incommensurate modulated host-guest structure with space group I4/mcm (γ).[18] This incommensurate structure consists of two interpenetrating sublattices, a body-centered host structure and a C face centered guest structure, along the crystallographic c axis. For powder Sc sample, the incommensurability increases with pressure[18] and Tc increases accordingly.[20] It is speculated that the strain in the thin film samples should suppress the increase of incommensurability under high pressure relative to the powder sample and lead to the Tc discrepancy. In the phases from Sc III to Sc V, Tc rises consistently at rising pressure. Sc III and Sc IV phases are not fully resolved, although a recent theoretical study suggested that the Ccca20 phase and Cmca32 phase are likely candidates for the observed Sc III and Sc IV, respectively.[19] Sc V phase occurs when pressure exceeds 240 GPa, which adopts a hexagonal lattice (space group P6122) consisting of six screw helical chains.[17] These results suggest that pressure-induced structure instability plays a key role in driving rising Tc in dense Sc, possibly driven by rising contribution of d orbital electronic states near the Fermi energy and the lattice softening associated with the phase transitions, both of which strengthen the electron phonon coupling.

    Fig. Fig. 4.  Phase diagram of superconducting transition temperature Tc and crystal structure versus pressure for Sc. The measured results on all the five samples show consistent trends.

    We also have performed electron phonon coupling density functional calculations to confirm the experimentally observed superconductivity as seen in Fig. S3. Details of the calculations are given in the Supplementary Materials. The predicted Tc at 240 GPa varies from 30 K to 33 K with empirical Coulomb repulsion parameter from 0.13 to 0.1. The results are similar to those reported in Ref. [32]. A valence electronic configuration Sc of 3s1.563p5.253d2.424s0.25 was obtained from the Mulliken population analysis of the crystal orbitals calculated using an atom-centered localized basis set.[33] It is obvious that the substantial charge migration from the Sc 4s to the 3d orbital is responsible for the strong electron phonon coupling.

    In summary, we have investigated transport properties of Sc under high pressure up to 283 GPa, and found that Tc is monotonously enhanced by pressure from 3.1 K at around 43 GPa to 32 K at around 283 GPa, following a sequence of high-pressure phase transitions from Sc II to Sc V. The increase of Tc shows no sign of saturation up to the highest experimental pressure of 283 GPa, which indicates that Tc of superconducting Sc still has room to go higher upon further compression. Scandium is the only currently known elemental superconductors with the Tconset breaking through 30 K at high pressure. The present results offer fresh insights for exploring high-Tc superconductivity at ultrahigh pressures in diverse element solids.

    During preparing the paper (arXiv:2303.01062) we became aware that an independent similar work (arXiv:2302.14378) has been carried out by J. J. Ying et al.[32]

    Acknowledgments: This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2021YFA1401800, 2022YFA1403800, and 2022YFA1403900), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11921004 and U2032220), and Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDB33010200). J. S. Tse wishes to thank NSERC Canada for a Discovery Grant. We thank C. F. Chen for helpful discussion.
  • [1]
    Buzea C, Robbie K 2005 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 18 R1 doi: 10.1088/0953-2048/18/1/R01

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2]
    Hamlin J J 2015 Physica C 514 59 doi: 10.1016/j.physc.2015.02.032

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3]
    Scanlan R M, Malozemoff A P, Larbalestier D C 2004 Proc. IEEE 92 1639 doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2004.833673

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4]
    Yabuuchi T, Matsuoka T, Nakamoto Y, Shimizu K 2006 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 75 083703 doi: 10.1143/JPSJ.75.083703

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5]
    Gregoryanz E, Struzhkin V V, Hemley R J, Eremets M I, Mao H K, Timofeev Y A 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65 064504 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.064504

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6]
    Shimizu K, Ishikawa H, Takao D, Yagi T, Amaya K 2002 Nature 419 597 doi: 10.1038/nature01098

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [7]
    Struzhkin V V, Eremets M I, Gan W, Mao H K, Hemley R J 2002 Science 298 1213 doi: 10.1126/science.1078535

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8]
    Hamlin J J, Tissen V G, Schilling J S 2007 Physica C 451 82 doi: 10.1016/j.physc.2006.10.012

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9]
    Zhang C L, He X, Liu C, Li Z W, Lu K, Zhang S J, Feng S M, Wang X C, Peng Y, Long Y W, Yu R C, Wang L H, Prakapenka V, Chariton S, Li Q, Liu H Z, Chen C F, Jin C Q 2022 Nat. Commun. 13 5411 doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33077-3

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10]
    Olijnyk H, Holzapfel W B 1984 Phys. Lett. A 100 191 doi: 10.1016/0375-96018490757-6

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11]
    Akahama Y, Kawamura H, Le B T 2002 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14 10583 doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/14/44/337

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [12]
    Ahuja R, Dubrovinsky L, Dubrovinskaia N, Guillen J M O, Mattesini M, Johansson B, Le B T 2004 Phys. Rev. B 69 184102 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.184102

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13]
    Oganov A R, Ma Y, Xu Y, Errea I, Bergara A, Lyakhov A O 2010 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107 7646 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910335107

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [14]
    Liu X Q, Jiang P, Wang Y M, Li M T, Li N N, Zhang Q, Wang Y D, Li Y L, Yang W G 2022 Phys. Rev. B 105 224511 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.224511

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15]
    Vohra Y K, Grosshans W, Holzapfel W B 1982 Phys. Rev. B 25 6019 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.6019

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [16]
    Zhao Y C, Porsch F, Holzapfel W B 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 9715 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.9715

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [17]
    Akahama Y, Fujihisa H, Kawamura H 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 195503 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.195503

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [18]
    Fujihisa H, Akahama Y, Kawamura H, Gotoh Y, Yamawaki H, Sakashita M, Takeya S, Honda K 2005 Phys. Rev. B 72 132103 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.132103

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [19]
    Zhu S C, Yan X Z, Fredericks S, Li Y L, Zhu Q 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 214116 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.214116

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [20]
    Debessai M, Hamlin J J, Schilling J S 2008 Phys. Rev. B 78 064519 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.064519

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [21]
    Wittig J, Probst C, Schmidt F A, Gschneidner K A 1979 Phys. Rev. Lett. 42 469 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.42.469

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [22]
    Hamlin J J, Schilling J S 2007 Phys. Rev. B 76 012505 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.012505

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [23]
    Arapan S, Skorodumova N V, Ahuja R 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 085701 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.085701

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [24]
    Tsuppayakorn-aek P, Luo W, Pungtrakoon W, Chuenkingkeaw K, Kaewmaraya T, Ahuja R, Bovornratanaraks T 2018 J. Appl. Phys. 124 225901 doi: 10.1063/1.5047251

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [25]
    Li Z W, He X, Zhang C L, Wang X C, Zhang S J, Jia Y T, Feng S M, Lu K, Zhao J F, Zhang J, Min B S, Long Y W, Yu R C, Wang L H, Ye M Y, Zhang Z S, Prakapenka V, Chariton S, Ginsberg P A, Bass J, Yuan S H, Liu H Z, Jin C Q 2022 Nat. Commun. 13 2863 doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30454-w

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [26]
    Jia Y T, He X, Feng S M, Zhang S J, Zhang C L, Ren C W, Wang X C, Jin C Q 2020 Crystals 10 1116 doi: 10.3390/cryst10121116

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [27]
    Zhang C L, He X, Li Z W, Zhang S J, Feng S M, Wang X C, Yu R C, Jin C Q 2022 Sci. Bull. 67 907 doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2022.03.001

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [28]
    Zhang C L, He X, Li Z W, Zhang S J, Min B S, Zhang J, Lu K, Zhao J F, Shi L C, Peng Y, Wang X C, Feng S M, Yu R C, Wang L H, Prakapenka V B, Chariton S, Liu H Z, Jin C Q 2022 Mater. Today Phys. 27 100826 doi: 10.1016/j.mtphys.2022.100826

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [29]
    Ishizuka M, Iketani M, Endo S 2000 Phys. Rev. B 61 R3823 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.R3823

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [30]
    Chu C W, Hor P H, Meng R L, Gao L, Huang Z J, Wang Y Q 1987 Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 405 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.405

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [31]
    Kamihara Y, Watanabe T, Hirano M, Hosono H 2008 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 3296 doi: 10.1021/ja800073m

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [32]
    Ying J J, Liu S Q, Lu Q, Wen X K, Gui Z G, Zhang Y Q, Wang X M, Sun J, Chen X H 2023 Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 256002 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.256002

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [33]
    Te V G, Baerends E J 1991 Phys. Rev. B 44 7888 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.44.7888

    CrossRef Google Scholar

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. Tao, X., Yang, A., Quan, Y. et al. Superconductivity and high hardness in scandium-borides under pressure. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2025. DOI:10.1039/d4cp03740e
    2. Talantsev, E.F., Minkov, V.S., Balakirev, F.F. et al. Comment on "nonstandard superconductivity or no superconductivity in hydrides under high pressure". Physical Review B, 2024, 110(18): 186501. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.110.186501
    3. Zhang, Y.-J., Zhu, Y., Li, Q. et al. Record-High Superconducting Transition Temperature in a Ti1-xMnx Alloy with the Rich Magnetic Element Mn. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2024, 146(30): 21110-21119. DOI:10.1021/jacs.4c06836
    4. Xue, H.-T., Li, J., Chang, Z. et al. Deep-learning potential molecular dynamics simulations of the structural and physical properties of rare-earth metal scandium. Computational Materials Science, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.113072
    5. Wu, X., Guo, S., Guo, J. et al. Robust T c in element molybdenum up to 160 GPa. Chinese Physics B, 2024, 33(4): 047406. DOI:10.1088/1674-1056/ad2a78
    6. He, X., Zhang, C.L., Li, Z.W. et al. Superconductivity discovered in niobium polyhydride at high pressures. Materials Today Physics, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.mtphys.2023.101298
    7. Zhao, K., Wang, Q., Li, H. et al. Superconductivity in dense scandium-based phosphides. Physical Review B, 2023, 108(17): 174513. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.108.174513
    8. Wang, K., Sun, Y., Zhou, M. et al. Superconductivity up to 37.6 K in compressed scandium. Physical Review Research, 2023, 5(4): 043248. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.043248

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Figures(4)

    Article views (102) PDF downloads (415) Cited by(8)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return