Diffraction-Limited Imaging with a Graphene Metalens
-
Abstract
Planar graphene metalens has demonstrated advantages of ultrathin thickness (200 nm), high focusing resolution (343 nm) and efficiency (32%) and robust mechanical strength and flexibility. However, diffraction-limited imaging with such a graphene metalens has not been realized, which holds the key to designing practical integrated imaging systems. In this work, the imaging rule for graphene metalenses is first derived and theoretically verified by using the Rayleigh-Sommerfeld diffraction theory to simulate the imaging performance of the 200 nm ultrathin graphene metalens. The imaging rule is applicable to graphene metalenses in different immersion media, including water or oil. Based on the theoretical prediction, high-resolution imaging using the graphene metalens with diffraction-limited resolution (500 nm) is demonstrated for the first time. This work opens the possibility for graphene metalenses to be applied in particle tracking, microfluidic chips and biomedical devices. -
Searching for high Tc superconductors is one of most important research topics in physical sciences. Elemental superconductors attract special and growing attention due to the simplicity of their singular composition.[1,2] About 20 elemental solids are known to show superconductivity at ambient pressure, of which niobium has the highest superconducting transition temperature Tc ∼ 9.2 K[1] and its alloy NbTi has been widely used for its excellent superconducting performance.[3] High pressure is a powerful tool and has been playing an important role in exploring new elemental superconductors and tuning superconducting properties.[2] For simple elemental metals, high pressure usually suppresses Tc because of the electronic band broadening and resulting reduction of the density of states near the Fermi energy. Lattice stiffness is another important factor that Tc goes down under pressure. However, these pressure effects on superconductivity may be altered by subtle structural and electronic changes associated with bonding or phase transitions. Pressure may also enable non-superconducting metals or even insulating solids at ambient pressure to host superconductivity at high pressure. For example, calcium is non-superconducting at ambient pressure, but exhibits a high Tc of 25 K at 161 GPa,[4] and insulating sulfur shows superconductivity with Tc ∼ 17 K at 200 GPa.[5] All known elemental superconductors with Tc near or above 20 K are realized under pressure, such as Li with Tc ∼ 16–20 K at 43–48 GPa[6,7] and yttrium with Tc ∼ 17 K at 89 GPa.[8] Our recent study showed that elemental titanium can reach Tc of 26.2 K at pressure of 248 GPa.[9]
It is indicated that both Ca and Ti show very high Tc among elemental solids because of the pressure induced s–d electron transition, which also drives a sequence of phase transitions.[4,9–14] The structure instability associated with the pressure induced tendency and occurrence of phase transitions favors superconductivity because of the lattice softening enhanced electron-phonon coupling strength.[9] The crystal structure and physical properties of Sc metal under pressure were examined in previous studies,[15–24] which showed that Sc has the hcp structure (Sc I) under ambient conditions, and pressure generates four structural transitions at about 23, 104, 140, and 240 GPa, respectively, producing high-pressure phases of Sc II, Sc III, Sc IV, and Sc V, respectively.[17–19] Sc II phase crystallizes in an incommensurate composite structure comprising a body centered host structure and a C face centered guest structure,[18] and Sc V phase has a hexagonal lattice consisting of six screw helical chains,[17] while Sc III and Sc IV phases are not fully determined.[19]
Previous work reported that Sc starts to show superconductivity at 21 GPa with Tc ∼ 0.35 K.[21] With further compression, Tc reaches as high as 19.6 K at 107 GPa, which occurs just at the phase boundary of Sc II and Sc III. However, Tc was reported to drop to ∼ 10 K when pressure is further increased and Sc III phase appears.[20] Here, we report high-pressure measurements up to 283 GPa to explore superconductivity in Sc. A maximal Tc above 30 K was observed at the highest experimental pressure, which sets a new record among elemental superconductors. To date, Sc is the only known elemental superconductor with Tc breaking into 30 K temperature range.
Experimental. The electrical resistance measurements were performed by using the four probe van der Pauw method for tiny specimen as described in the literature.[25,26] The pressure was calibrated via the shift of the first order Raman edge frequency from the diamond cutlet as shown in the previous reports.[9,27,28] The applied current is 100 μA. Diamond anvil cells were used to produce high pressures. A variant of anvils with double beveled culet size of 20/140/300 μm, 30/140/300 μm, or 50/140/300 μm were adopted in the experiments. A plate of T301 stainless steel covered with mixture of c-BN powder and epoxy as insulating layer was used as the gasket. A hole of approximately 15 ∼ 30 μm in diameter depending on top culet size was drilled in the center of the gasket to serve as high pressure chamber. Also, h-BN powder was used as pressure transmitting medium that filled the high pressure chamber. We used the ATHENA procedure to produce the specimen assembly.[26] Four Pt foils with thickness of approximately 0.5 μm as the inner electrode were deposited on the culet surface, after which cross shaped Sc specimens with side lengths ∼ 10 μm × 10 μm and thickness of 1 μm were adhered on the electrodes and culet surface. Tens of specimens are prepared for the experiments. Diamond anvil cells were put into a MagLab system that provides synergetic extreme environments with temperatures from 300 to 1.5 K and magnetic fields up to 9 T for the transport measurements.
Results and Discussion. Figure 1(a) shows the temperature dependence of electrical resistance at high pressure up to 215 GPa measured during the warming process for Sc sample 1. The Sc metal starts to show superconductivity with Tc above 3.3 K at 43 GPa. The Tc monotonously rises to ∼ 26.2 K at 215 GPa, which is much higher than the 8.2 K at 74 GPa reported by Hamlin et al.[22] and 19.6 K at 107 GPa reported by Debessai et al.[20] Considering that Tc shows an increasing tendency with further compression, we extended to higher pressures up to 283 GPa for sample 2 and observed enhancement of Tc in dense Sc metal. Temperature dependence of the electrical resistance for sample 2 under various pressures are shown in Fig. 1(b). With further increasing pressure, Tc reaches 32 K at the maximum experimental pressure of 283 GPa as shown in Fig. 2, where both cooling and warming curves are presented. It is evidenced in the experiments that cooling process usually gave rather higher transition temperature since it is not easy to reach thermal equilibrium with helium cooling rate. Alternatively the warming process can be subtly tuned to reach thermal equilibrium that approaches the intrinsic properties of the measured samples. We hence chose the Tc measured from warming process. For the warming process the onset critical temperature (
) and the zero resistance critical temperature ( ) of superconducting transition at 283 GPa can be determined by the derivative of resistance with respect to temperature, i.e., dR/dT, to be 32 K and 31 K, respectively, demonstrating a very narrow superconducting transition. The data for samples 3 and 4 shown by Figs. S1(a) and S1(b) in the Supplementary Materials further confirm the superconductivity of Sc under high pressure with Tc above 30 K. Among elemental superconductors, niobium has the highest Tc of 9.2 K at ambient pressure, while under high pressure several elements exhibit high Tc near or above 20 K, such as Li (Tc ∼ 15–20 K at 48 GPa[6,7]), Ca (Tc ∼ 25 K at 220 GPa[4]), Y (Tc ∼ 20 K near 100 GPa[8]), V (Tc ∼ 17 K at 120 GPa[29]), S (Tc ∼ 17 K at 220 GPa[5]), and Ti (Tc ∼ 26.2 K near 248 GPa[9]). Superconductivity above 30 K in elemental solids has never been reported before, and Sc is the first and so far only known elemental superconductor with Tc breaking into the record-setting 30 K range, which is comparable to the Tc of the classic LaBaCuO[30] and LaFeAsO superconductors.[31]
To further probe superconductivity of dense Sc metal under high pressure, we measured transport properties under different magnetic fields for sample 2. Figure 3(a) presents the electrical resistance measured at 283 GPa with applying magnetic fields. It is seen that the superconducting transitions are gradually suppressed by the magnetic field. Here, the temperature at 90% of normal state resistance was used to plot the data of
versus magnetic field measured at 283 GPa as shown in Fig. 3(b), from which the upper critical field at zero temperature μ0Hc2(0) can be estimated. A linear fitting of Hc2(T) leads to the slope of dHc2/dT|Tc of −2.65 T/K. Using the Werthamer–Helfand–Hohenberg (WHH) formula of μ0Hc2(T) = −0.69 × [dHc2/dT|Tc] × Tc, the μ0Hc2(0) value controlled by orbital depairing mechanism in a dirty limit [ ] was calculated to be 58 T. The Ginzburg–Landau (GL) formula of μ0Hc2(T) = μ0Hc2(0) × [1−(T/Tc)2] is also used to estimate the upper critical field at zero temperature. As shown in Fig. 3(b), the fitting of μ0Hc2(T) by the GL formula gives a value of Hc2(0) = 43.7 T, which is slightly smaller than . Using the obtained value of Hc2(0), the GL coherence length was calculated to be ξ = 27.4 Å via μ0Hc2(0) = Φ0/2πξ2, where Φ0 = 2.067 × 10−15 Web is the magnetic flux quantum. Fig. Fig. 3. (a) Temperature dependence of the electrical resistance of Sc metal measured at different magnetic fields under fixed pressure of 283 GPa. The dashed line marks the 90% of the normal state resistance. (b) Upper critical field μ0Hc2 versus temperature at 283 GPa. The Ginzburg–Landau (GL) fit for the Hc2 (T) is shown by the solid lines. The star symbol represents the Hc2 (0) values calculated via the Werthamer–Helfand–Hohenberg (WHH) model.Combining our high-pressure x-ray experiments (Fig. S2) and the phase transition behaviors reported previously,[17–19] we plot the pressure-driven structure-superconductivity phase diagram as shown in Fig. 4. Five different crystal structures of Sc are identified when pressure varies from ambient pressure to 297 GPa. No superconductivity above 2 K was observed in Sc I within the pressure range 0–23 GPa. With increasing pressure, Tc monotonously rises from 3.1 K at 43 GPa to 32 K at 283 GPa as shown by the data of thin foil samples 1–4. One remarkable interesting feature is the pressure dependence of Tc, showing non-saturating behavior, which suggests that Tc could be further enhanced by further compression under higher-pressure conditions. We note that the monotonous rise of Tc is different from the previous work reported by Debessai et al.,[20] where an abrupt Tc drop is found at 111 GPa that is near the boundary between the Sc II and Sc III phases. To double check this discrepancy, one additional high-pressure transport measurement was performed on powder Sc sample instead of thin film. As shown in Figs. S1(c) and S1(d), at 102 GPa there exist two superconducting transitions at 17.5 K and 14 K, respectively. With further increasing pressure, the low-Tc transition gradually shifts toward high temperature while the high Tc transition disappears, which implies that there does exist a phase transition near 102 GPa. The low-Tc superconductivity should arise from the Sc III phase, which is consistent with the Tc drop near the phase transition reported in the previous work.[20] Except for the data in the Sc II phase in the range 82–102 GPa, the pressure dependences of Tc for the thin film and powder samples are well matched. Sc II phase adopts an incommensurate modulated host-guest structure with space group I4/mcm (γ).[18] This incommensurate structure consists of two interpenetrating sublattices, a body-centered host structure and a C face centered guest structure, along the crystallographic c axis. For powder Sc sample, the incommensurability increases with pressure[18] and Tc increases accordingly.[20] It is speculated that the strain in the thin film samples should suppress the increase of incommensurability under high pressure relative to the powder sample and lead to the Tc discrepancy. In the phases from Sc III to Sc V, Tc rises consistently at rising pressure. Sc III and Sc IV phases are not fully resolved, although a recent theoretical study suggested that the Ccca20 phase and Cmca32 phase are likely candidates for the observed Sc III and Sc IV, respectively.[19] Sc V phase occurs when pressure exceeds 240 GPa, which adopts a hexagonal lattice (space group P6122) consisting of six screw helical chains.[17] These results suggest that pressure-induced structure instability plays a key role in driving rising Tc in dense Sc, possibly driven by rising contribution of d orbital electronic states near the Fermi energy and the lattice softening associated with the phase transitions, both of which strengthen the electron phonon coupling.
We also have performed electron phonon coupling density functional calculations to confirm the experimentally observed superconductivity as seen in Fig. S3. Details of the calculations are given in the Supplementary Materials. The predicted Tc at 240 GPa varies from 30 K to 33 K with empirical Coulomb repulsion parameter from 0.13 to 0.1. The results are similar to those reported in Ref. [32]. A valence electronic configuration Sc of 3s1.563p5.253d2.424s0.25 was obtained from the Mulliken population analysis of the crystal orbitals calculated using an atom-centered localized basis set.[33] It is obvious that the substantial charge migration from the Sc 4s to the 3d orbital is responsible for the strong electron phonon coupling.
In summary, we have investigated transport properties of Sc under high pressure up to 283 GPa, and found that Tc is monotonously enhanced by pressure from 3.1 K at around 43 GPa to 32 K at around 283 GPa, following a sequence of high-pressure phase transitions from Sc II to Sc V. The increase of Tc shows no sign of saturation up to the highest experimental pressure of 283 GPa, which indicates that Tc of superconducting Sc still has room to go higher upon further compression. Scandium is the only currently known elemental superconductors with the
breaking through 30 K at high pressure. The present results offer fresh insights for exploring high-Tc superconductivity at ultrahigh pressures in diverse element solids. During preparing the paper (arXiv:2303.01062) we became aware that an independent similar work (arXiv:2302.14378) has been carried out by J. J. Ying et al.[32]
-
References
[1] Kostuk R K, Goodman J W and Hesselink L 1985 Appl. Opt. 24 2851 doi: 10.1364/AO.24.002851[2] Parazzoli C G, Greegor R B, Nielsen J A, Thompson M A et al.. 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 3232 doi: 10.1063/1.1728304[3] Kou Q, Yesilyurt I, Studer V, Belotti M, Cambril E and Chen Y 2004 Microelectron. Eng. 73 876 doi: 10.1016/S0167-93170400237-0[4] Rossi M, Kunz R E and Herzig H P 1995 Appl. Opt. 34 5996 doi: 10.1364/AO.34.005996[5] Booth M, Andrade D, Burke D, Patton B and Zurauskas M 2015 Microscopy 64 251 doi: 10.1093/jmicro/dfv033[6] Arbabi A, Horie Y, Ball A J, Bagheri M and Faraon A 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 7069 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8069[7] O'Shea D C, Suleski T J, Kathman A D and Prather D W 2004 Diffractive Optics: Design, Fabrication and Test London: SPIE Press[8] Turunen J and Wyrowski F 1998 Diffractive Optics for Industrial and Commercial Applications New York: Wiley-VCH[9] Yu N and Capasso F 2014 Nat. Mater. 13 139 doi: 10.1038/nmat3839[10] Li X, Xiao S, Cai B, He Q, Cui T J and Zhou L 2012 Opt. Lett. 37 4940 doi: 10.1364/OL.37.004940[11] Shen F and Wang A 2006 Appl. Opt. 45 1102 doi: 10.1364/AO.45.001102[12] McMahon M D, Berglund A J, Carmichael P, McClelland J J and Liddle J A 2009 ACS Nano 3 609 doi: 10.1021/nn8008036[13] Ragan T, Huang H and So P 2006 J. Fluoresc. 16 325 doi: 10.1007/s10895-005-0040-1[14] Yang Y, Lin H, Zhang B Y, Zhang Y, Zheng X, Yu A et al.. 2019 ACS Photon. 6 1033 doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.9b00060[15] Cao G, Lin H, Fraser S, Zheng X, Del Rosal B, Gan Z et al.. 2019 ACS Appl. Mater. & Interfaces 11 20298 doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b05109[16] Cao G, Gan X, Lin H and Jia B 2018 Opto-Electron. Adv. 1 180012 doi: 10.29026/oea.2018.180012[17] Zheng X, Jia B, Lin H, Qiu L, Li D and Gu M 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 8433 doi: 10.1038/ncomms9433[18] Hecht E 2002 Optics San Francisco: Addison Wesley[19] Meijering E, Dzyubachyk O and Smal I 2012 Methods Enzymology 504 183 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-391857-4.00009-4[20] Li X, Wei S, Cao G, Lin H, Zhao Y and Jia B 2020 Photon. Res. 8 1316 doi: 10.1364/PRJ.397262[21] Wang S, Ouyang X, Feng Z, Cao Y, Gu M and Li X 2018 Opto-Electron. Adv. 1 170002 doi: 10.29026/oea.2018.170002[22] Yang Y, Noviana E, Nguyen M P, Geiss B J, Dandy D S and Henry C S 2017 Anal. Chem. 89 71 doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04581[23] Cate D M, Adkins J A, Mettakoonpitak J and Henry C S 2015 Anal. Chem. 87 19 doi: 10.1021/ac503968p[24] Gabrielli L H, Liu D, Johnson S G and Lipson M 2012 Nat. Commun. 3 1217 doi: 10.1038/ncomms2232[25] Wang Y, Yun W and Jacobsen C 2003 Nature 424 50 doi: 10.1038/nature01756[26] Becker H and Locascio L E 2002 Talanta 56 267 doi: 10.1016/S0039-91400100594-X[27] Sbalzarini I F and Koumoutsakos P 2005 J. Struct. Biol. 151 182 doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.06.002[28] Gloge D and Marcuse D 1969 J. Opt. Soc. Am. 59 1629 doi: 10.1364/JOSA.59.001629[29] Gu M 2000 Advanced Optical Imaging Theory Berlin: Springer[30] Lin H, Sturmberg B C, Lin K T, Yang Y, Zheng X, Chong T K et al.. 2019 Nat. Photon. 13 270 doi: 10.1038/s41566-019-0389-3[31] Yang Y, Wu J, Xu X, Liang Y, Chu S T, Little B E et al.. 2018 APL Photon. 3 120803 doi: 10.1063/1.5045509[32] Zheng X, Lin H, Yang T and Jia B 2017 J. Phys. D 50 074003 doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/aa54e9[33] Kong X T, Khan A A, Kidambi P R, Deng S, Yetisen A K, Dlubak B et al.. 2015 ACS Photon. 2 200 doi: 10.1021/ph500197j[34] Zheng X, Jia B, Chen X and Gu M 2014 Adv. Mater. 26 2699 doi: 10.1002/adma.201304681[35] Li P and Taubner T 2012 ACS Nano 6 10107 doi: 10.1021/nn303845a[36] Moghaddam A G and Zareyan M 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 146803 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.146803[37] Loh K P, Bao Q, Eda G and Chhowalla M 2010 Nat. Chem. 2 1015 doi: 10.1038/nchem.907[38] Cheianov V V, Fal'ko V and Altshuler B 2007 Science 315 1252 doi: 10.1126/science.1138020[39] Cumming B P, Turner M D, Schröder-Turk G E, Debbarma S, Luther-Davies B and Gu M 2014 Opt. Express 22 689 doi: 10.1364/OE.22.000689[40] Jia B, Li J and Gu M 2007 Aust. J. Chem. 60 484 doi: 10.1071/CH06484[41] Cheng Y, Tsai H L, Sugioka K and Midorikawa K 2006 Appl. Phys. A 85 11 doi: 10.1007/s00339-006-3672-3[42] Khorasaninejad M, Chen W T, Devlin R C, Oh J, Zhu A Y and Capasso F 2016 Science 352 1190 doi: 10.1126/science.aaf6644 -
Related Articles
[1] Chenyu Yuan, Yuanhao Su, Chunfang Wang. High-Quality Single-Pixel Imaging Based on Large-Kernel Convolution under Low-Sampling Conditions [J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2025, 42(4): 044201. doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/42/4/044201 [2] YANG Di-Wu, XING Da, ZHAO Xue-Hui, PAN Chang-Ning, FANG Jian-Shu. A Combined Reconstruction Algorithm for Limited-View Multi-Element Photoacoustic Imaging [J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2010, 27(5): 054301. doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/27/5/054301 [3] HU Ji-Gang, WANG-Pei, LU Yong-Hua, MING Hai, CHEN Chun-Chong, CHEN Jun-Xue. Sub-diffraction-Limit Imaging in Optical Hyperlens [J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2008, 25(12): 4439-4441. [4] HU Ji-Gang, CAO Yong, WANG Pei, LU Yong-Hua, MING Hai. Parameter Study on Far-Field Sub-Diffraction-Limited Hyperlens [J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2008, 25(11): 4151-4153. [5] ZHANG Ying-Tao, HE Chen-Juan, LI Hong-Guo, WANG Kai-Ge. Novel Ghost Imaging Method for a Pure Phase Object [J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2008, 25(7): 2481-2484. [6] SONG Jie, XIA Si-Fei, XU Duan-Yi. Approximated Vector Diffraction Theory for Readout Signal of Multi-Level Run-Length-Limited Discs [J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2008, 25(6): 2097-2100. [7] GUO Hua, HAN Shen-Sheng. Instability of Solution of Phase Retrieval in Direct Diffraction Phase-Contrast Imaging with Partially Coherent X-Ray Source [J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2006, 23(12): 3259-3262. [8] WANG Dan-Ling, LI Cheng-De, LUO Le, YANG Hong, GONG Qi-Huang. Sub-diffraction-Limit Voids in Bulk Quartz Induced byFemtosecond Laser Pulses [J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2001, 18(1): 65-67. [9] CAO Qunsheng, PENG Gongwen, TIAN Decheng. Diffusion-Limited Aggregation of Dimers [J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 1992, 9(3): 120-122. [10] WANG Xiaomin, ZHENG Dafang, LIN Zhifang, TAO Ruibao. TRAILS ON A REGULAR DIFFUSION-LIMITED AGGREGATION FRACTAL [J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 1990, 7(5): 193-196. -
Cited by
Periodical cited type(8)
1. Tao, X., Yang, A., Quan, Y. et al. Superconductivity and high hardness in scandium-borides under pressure. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2025. DOI:10.1039/d4cp03740e 2. Talantsev, E.F., Minkov, V.S., Balakirev, F.F. et al. Comment on "nonstandard superconductivity or no superconductivity in hydrides under high pressure". Physical Review B, 2024, 110(18): 186501. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.110.186501 3. Zhang, Y.-J., Zhu, Y., Li, Q. et al. Record-High Superconducting Transition Temperature in a Ti1-xMnx Alloy with the Rich Magnetic Element Mn. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2024, 146(30): 21110-21119. DOI:10.1021/jacs.4c06836 4. Xue, H.-T., Li, J., Chang, Z. et al. Deep-learning potential molecular dynamics simulations of the structural and physical properties of rare-earth metal scandium. Computational Materials Science, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.113072 5. Wu, X., Guo, S., Guo, J. et al. Robust T c in element molybdenum up to 160 GPa. Chinese Physics B, 2024, 33(4): 047406. DOI:10.1088/1674-1056/ad2a78 6. He, X., Zhang, C.L., Li, Z.W. et al. Superconductivity discovered in niobium polyhydride at high pressures. Materials Today Physics, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.mtphys.2023.101298 7. Zhao, K., Wang, Q., Li, H. et al. Superconductivity in dense scandium-based phosphides. Physical Review B, 2023, 108(17): 174513. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.108.174513 8. Wang, K., Sun, Y., Zhou, M. et al. Superconductivity up to 37.6 K in compressed scandium. Physical Review Research, 2023, 5(4): 043248. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.043248 Other cited types(0)