Anomalous Transport Induced by Non-Hermitian Anomalous Berry Connection in Non-Hermitian Systems
-
Abstract
Non-Hermitian materials can exhibit not only exotic energy band structures but also an anomalous velocity induced by non-Hermitian anomalous Berry connection as predicted by the semiclassical equations of motion for Bloch electrons. However, it is unclear how the modified semiclassical dynamics modifies transport phenomena. Here, we theoretically demonstrate the emergence of anomalous oscillations driven by either an external dc or ac electric field, which arise from non-Hermitian anomalous Berry connection. Moreover, it is a well-known fact that geometric structures of electric wave functions can only affect the Hall conductivity. However, we are surprised to find a non-Hermitian anomalous Berry connection induced anomalous linear longitudinal conductivity independent of the scattering time. We also show the emergence of a second-order nonlinear longitudinal conductivity induced by non-Hermitian anomalous Berry connection, violating a well-known fact of its absence in a Hermitian system with symmetric energy spectra. These anomalous phenomena are illustrated in a pseudo-Hermitian system with large non-Hermitian anomalous Berry connection. Finally, we propose a practical scheme to realize the anomalous oscillations in an optical system. -
The study of light-matter interactions is a crucial method for exploring material properties and understanding fundamental physical laws. When intense laser pulses interact with matter, high-order nonlinear optical effects generate high-order harmonic radiation.[1–10] These high-order harmonics are significant sources of coherent light in the extreme ultraviolet and soft X-ray regions.[11–13] The high-order harmonic spectrum encodes structural information about the material during the emission process, making it valuable for probing the material structure and ultrafast electron dynamics.[14–16] Furthermore, owing to the broad bandwidth of its emission spectrum, high-order harmonic generation is a key technique for producing attosecond (10−18 s) duration optical pulses.[17–21] Such ultrashort pulses enable high-resolution studies of electron dynamics on the attosecond timescale, providing an important tool for ultrafast measurements.
Following over a decade of intensive development, significant progress has been made in experimental research on attosecond pulses. In 2012, Zhao et al. achieved an isolated attosecond pulse (IAP) with a duration of 67 as using a double optical gating technique that combined polarization gating with a two-color driving field.[22] In 2017, Gaumnitz et al. reported the shortest IAP ever recorded, with a duration of 43 as.[23] In addition, numerous theoretical approaches have been proposed for generating ultrashort attosecond pulses using high-order harmonics. In 2010, Zou et al. produced attosecond pulses with durations of less than 100 as using a two-color field scheme.[24] In 2019, Han et al. obtained high-intensity IAPs employing spatially inhomogeneous fields.[25]
Traditionally, attosecond pulses have been primarily synthesized using gaseous media. However, since Ghimire et al. first experimentally observed the harmonic spectrum of ZnO crystals in 2011,[26] research has expanded to study and observe harmonic radiation in a variety of solid materials, ranging from wide band-gap dielectric materials to new zero band gap two-dimensional materials.[27–36] The discovery of solid harmonics has introduced a novel approach for generating and manipulating attosecond pulses within condensed matter systems, thereby advancing the fields of strong-field physics and attosecond science.[37] In 2019, Nourbakhsh et al. investigated the effects of incident laser pulse intensity, ellipticity, and crystal anisotropy on the emitted harmonics and corresponding IAPs.[38] In addition, Zhong et al. proposed a method for generating strong circularly polarized attosecond pulses using a relativistic two-color linearly polarized laser and solid target.[39]
From the above research, it can be observed that the characteristics of the laser pulse can affect the synthesis of the solid attosecond pulse. In this study, three-band semiconductor Bloch equations[40–45] are numerically solved to systematically study the harmonic radiation process after the interaction between the three-color combined pulse and MgO crystal in the Γ-X direction. The band structure and transition dipole moment of the MgO crystal used are consistent with those reported in Ref. [46]. In our numerical simulation, the dephasing time was 1.42 fs, and the three-color field was composed of linearly polarized femtosecond laser pulses with the same polarization direction. The specific form is as follows (atomic units are used in this study unless otherwise stated):
E(t)=E1(t)+E2(t)+E3(t)=E1f1(t)cos(ω1t+ϕ1)+E2f2(t)cos(ω2t+ϕ2)+E3f3(t)cos(ω3t+ϕ3), (1) where Ej, ωj, fj, and ϕj (j = 1, 2, 3) are the peak intensity, center frequency, pulse envelope, and carrier-envelope phase of the electric field of three linearly polarized laser pulses, respectively. The function of the Gaussian envelope is
fj(t)=exp[−2ln2(t2/τ2j)], (2) where τj (j = 1, 2, 3) is the full width at half maximum of three linearly polarized laser pulses. The three-color laser field is composed of 16 fs/2400 nm pulse laser with a peak amplitude of 0.01 a.u., 12.7 fs/1900 nm pulse laser with a peak amplitude of 0.006 a.u., and 8 fs/1200 nm pulse laser with a peak amplitude of 0.007 a.u.
Figure 1(a) presents the temporal profile of the electric field of the three-color pulse laser synthesis with an initial carrier-envelope phase ϕj = 0 (black solid line) and the monochromatic field (red dotted line). The monochromatic field is the 16 fs/2400 nm pulse laser with a peak amplitude of 0.01 a.u., which is consistent with those of the first mid-infrared femtosecond pulse laser in the three-color field. It can be seen that the synthesized electric field exhibits characteristics of a high-power, few-cycle mid-infrared femtosecond laser, and the maximum peak intensity of the three-color field is greatly improved compared to the monochromatic field. The black solid line in Fig. 1(b) depicts the high-order harmonic emission spectrum along the Γ-X direction of a MgO crystal irradiated by the three-color field. This spectrum shows a two-platform structure with supercontinuum features on both platforms. As a comparison, the red dotted line in Fig. 1(b) indicates the high-order harmonic emission spectrum of MgO crystal irradiated by a monochromatic field. It can be clearly seen from Fig. 1(b) that the harmonic spectrum of MgO crystal driven by a monochromatic field is discontinuous, the spectral peaks are relatively discrete, and there is no second platform. In addition, due to the increase of the electric field amplitude of the superimposed synthetic field, the efficiency of the whole harmonic platform in the monochromatic field is several orders of magnitude lower than that in the three-color synthetic field.
Fig. 1. (a) Variation of three-color combined pulse and monochromatic pulse with time; (b) Harmonic spectra of MgO crystal driven by three-color combined and monochromatic pulses; (c) Time-frequency distribution of total harmonic spectrum under the three-color combined pulse; (d) Time-frequency distribution of total harmonic spectrum under the monochromatic pulse.To gain a deeper understanding of the harmonic spectrum characteristics for both the three-color combined pulse and the monochromatic pulse, we employ time-frequency analysis to examine harmonic emission times. Figures 1(c) and 1(d) present the time-frequency distributions of the total harmonic spectra under the three-color combined field and the monochromatic field, respectively. The color indicates the harmonic intensity. Under the three-color combined pulse, the emission time for the second plateau (in the range of 40–60 orders) occurs later than that for the first plateau (in the range of 10–40 orders), and the intensity of the second plateau is approximately one order of magnitude lower than that of the first plateau. Notably, harmonics in both plateaus are predominantly generated via a single quantum path, resulting in a continuous and smooth harmonic spectrum under the three-color combined pulse. In contrast, under the monochromatic pulse, the first plateau of the harmonic spectrum displays multiple emission trajectories, while no trajectories are observed for the second plateau. Consequently, the MgO crystal fails to produce a continuous spectrum under the monochromatic field.
To elucidate the origin of the continuous spectrum emitted by MgO crystals under a three-color combined pulse, we analyze the time-dependent electron population shown in Fig. 2(a). For comparison, we also present the time-dependent electron population changes in a monochromatic field in Fig. 2(b). In the monochromatic field, electrons in the valence band undergo multiple transitions to the first conduction band, resulting in a harmonic spectrum produced through the interference of multiple emission trajectories. Additionally, the electron population in the second conduction band is minimal in the monochromatic field, indicating a low likelihood of electron transition to this band, which accounts for the weak harmonic radiation in the second plateau. Driven by the three-color combination pulse, the electrons on the valence band mainly transition to the first conduction band near the laser center, and the electrons on the second conduction band are mainly generated near the laser center, but the electrons on the second conduction band are generated slightly later than the first conduction band, so the emission time of the second platform harmonic will be later than the emission time of the first platform harmonic, so the continuous harmonic spectrum of the single quantum trajectory emission of the two platforms can be obtained under the three-color combination pulse.
The above analysis shows that the continuous harmonic spectrum obtained by using three-color combined pulses is expected to synthesize isolated attosecond pulses. In the case of the three-color field scheme, an isolated attosecond pulse with a full width at half maximum of about 450 as is obtained by superimposing 8th–25th order harmonics on the harmonic spectrum platform, as shown in Fig. 3(a). By superimposing the 8th–50th order harmonics on the harmonic spectrum platform, an isolated attosecond pulse with a weak pulse is obtained, in which the full width at half maximum of the main pulse is about 370 as, as shown in Fig. 3(b). It can be seen that efficient isolated attosecond pulse generation can be achieved by using a suitable three-pulse laser combination scheme.
Furthermore, we investigate the influence of the initial carrier-envelope phase of the three-color combined pulse on the attosecond pulse synthesis. Figure 4(a) shows the laser field when ϕ1 = 0.2π, ϕ2 = ϕ3 = 0 and ϕ2 = 0.2π, ϕ1 = ϕ3 = 0. It can be seen that the three-color combined pulse still exhibits few-period characteristics after changing the phase. The black solid line and the red dotted line in Fig. 4(b) show the isolated attosecond pulse obtained by superimposing the 8th–25th harmonics on the harmonic spectrum platform driven by the laser field when ϕ1 = 0.2π, ϕ2 = ϕ3 = 0 and ϕ2 = 0.2π, ϕ1 = ϕ3 = 0, respectively. It can be seen that the isolated attosecond pulse can still be obtained by changing the initial carrier-envelope phase of the laser field in a small range.
At the end of this paper, we calculate the harmonic radiation spectrum of H atom and the corresponding time-frequency analysis spectrum under the three-color combined pulse by numerically solving the time-dependent Schrödinger equation,[47] as shown in Fig. 5. The laser parameters are consistent with those used in Fig. 1. It can be seen from Fig. 5(a) that under the same field parameters, the harmonic radiation spectrum intensity of H atom is much lower than that of MgO crystal, and the harmonic spectrum of MgO crystal is more continuous, which is more conducive to the generation of high-intensity isolated attosecond pulses. In addition, by comparing the time-frequency emission spectra of the H atom in Fig. 5(b) and the MgO crystal in Fig. 1(c), it can be found that the time-frequency emission spectrum of MgO crystal only has a single emission trajectory, which is positive chirp in the first platform and no chirp in the second platform. The time-frequency emission spectrum of the H atom has multiple emission trajectories and both positive and negative chirps.
In summary, by utilizing the interaction between a three-color combined pulse and an MgO crystal, the electron ionization is controlled to occur at a half cycle near the center of the laser pulse, we have achieved a supercontinuum spectrum with two distinct plateaus. Fourier transform is performed on the continuous harmonic spectrum to obtain an isolated attosecond pulse. The minimum pulse duration is 370 as. Since the harmonic intensity in the three-color field is higher than that in the monochromatic field, the obtained attosecond pulse intensity is relatively higher. The advantage of the three-color combined pulse lies in its ability to generate a single quantum trajectory and the isolated attosecond pulse’s minimal sensitivity to the initial carrier-envelope phase. Our results highlight the potential of solids in the field of attosecond pulse synthesis and provide significant insights for the development of solid-state light sources.
-
References
[1] El-Ganainy R, Makris K G, Khajavikhan M, Musslimani Z H, Rotter S, and Christodoulides D N 2018 Nat. Phys. 14 11 doi: 10.1038/nphys4323[2] Xu Y 2019 Front. Phys. 14 43402 doi: 10.1007/s11467-019-0896-1[3] Zhang D W, Zhu Y Q, Zhao Y X, Yan H, and Zhu S L 2019 Adv. Phys. 67 253 doi: 10.1080/00018732.2019.1594094[4] Ashida Y, Gong Z, and Ueda M 2020 Adv. Phys. 69 249 doi: 10.1080/00018732.2021.1876991[5] Bergholtz E J, Budich J C, and Kunst F K 2021 Rev. Mod. Phys. 93 015005 doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.93.015005[6] Zhen B, Hsu C W, Igarashi Y, Lu L, Kaminer I, Pick A, Chua S L, Joannopoulos J D, and Soljačić M 2015 Nature 525 354 doi: 10.1038/nature14889[7] Xu Y, Wang S T, and Duan L M 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 045701 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.045701[8] Cerjan A, Xiao M, Yuan L, and Fan S 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 075128 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.075128[9] Zhou H Y, Peng C, Yoon Y, Hsu C W, Nelson K A, Fu L, Joannopoulos J D, Soljačić M, and Zhen B 2018 Science 359 1009 doi: 10.1126/science.aap9859[10] Carlström J and Bergholtz E J 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 042114 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.98.042114[11] Yang Z and Hu J 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 041202R doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.041202[12] Wang H Q, Ruan J W, and Zhang H J 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 075130 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.075130[13] Özdemir S K, Rotter S, Nori F, and Yang L 2019 Nat. Mater. 18 783 doi: 10.1038/s41563-019-0304-9[14] Cerjan A, Huang S, Wang M, Chen K P, Chong Y, and Rechtsman M C 2019 Nat. Photon. 13 623 doi: 10.1038/s41566-019-0453-z[15] Kawabata K, Bessho T, and Sato M 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 066405 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.066405[16] Zhang X F, Ding K, Zhou X J, Xu J, and Jin D F 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 237202 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.237202[17] Hou J, Li Z, Luo X W, Gu Q, and Zhang C 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 073603 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.073603[18] Yang Z, Chiu C K, Fang C, and Hu J 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 186402 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.186402[19] Wang K K, Xiao L, Budich J C, Yi W, and Xue P 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 026404 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.026404[20] Kozii V and Fu L 2017 arXiv:1708.05841 [cond-mat.mes-hall][21] Zyuzin A A and Zyuzin A Y 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 041203R doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.041203[22] Yoshida T, Peters R, and Kawakami N 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 035141 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.035141[23] Zhao P L, Wang A M, and Liu G Z 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 085150 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.085150[24] Yoshida T, Peters R, Kawakami N, and Hatsugai Y 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 121101R doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.121101[25] Nagai Y, Qi Y, Isobe H, Kozii V, and Fu L 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 227204 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.227204[26] Okuma N and Sato M 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 176601 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.176601[27] Tao Y L, Qin T, and Xu Y 2021 arXiv:2111.03348 [cond-mat.str-el][28] Chang M C and Niu Q 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 1348 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1348[29] Sundaram G and Niu Q 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 14915 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.14915[30] Xiao D, Shi J, and Niu Q 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 137204 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.137204[31] Xiao D, Chang M C, and Niu Q 2010 Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 1959 doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1959[32] Gao Y, Yang S A, and Niu Q 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 166601 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.166601[33] Sodemann I and Fu L 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 216806 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.216806[34] Silberstein N, Behrends J, Goldstein M, and Ilan R 2020 Phys. Rev. B 102 245147 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.245147[35] See the Supplementary Material[36] Blohmann C 2003 Eur. Phys. J. C 30 435 doi: 10.1140/epjc/s2003-01306-2[37] Zhu Y Q, Zheng W, Zhu S L, and Palumbo G 2021 Phys. Rev. B 104 205103 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.205103[38] Mostafazadeh A 2002 J. Math. Phys. 43 205 doi: 10.1063/1.1418246[39] Zhang K, Yang Z, and Fang C 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 126402 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.126402[40] Okuma N, Kawabata K, Shiozaki K, and Sato M 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 086801 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.086801[41] Borgnia D S, Kruchkov A J, and Slager R J 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 056802 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.056802[42] Yao S and Wang Z 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 086803 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.086803[43] Xiong Y 2018 J. Phys. Commun. 2 035043 doi: 10.1088/2399-6528/aab64a[44] Mao L, Deng T, and Zhang P 2021 Phys. Rev. B 104 125435 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.125435[45] Hafezi M, Demler E A, Lukin M D, and Taylor J M 2011 Nat. Phys. 7 907 doi: 10.1038/nphys2063[46] Yanik M F and Fan S 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 083901 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.083901[47] Longhi S, Gatti D, and Valle G D 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 13376 doi: 10.1038/srep13376 -
Related Articles
[1] ZHANG Ji-Cai, ZHU Zun-Lue, LIU Yu-Fang, SUN Jin-Feng. Elastic Scattering Properties of Ultracold Strontium Atoms [J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2011, 28(12): 123401. doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/28/12/123401 [2] Tasawar Hayat, Najma Saleem, Awatif A. Hendi. A Mathematical Model for Studying the Slip Effect on Peristaltic Motion with Heat and Mass Transfer [J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2011, 28(3): 034702. doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/28/3/034702 [3] CHEN Xi, YANG Guo-Qing, WANG Jin, ZHAN Ming-Sheng. Coherent Population Trapping-Ramsey Interference in Cold Atoms [J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2010, 27(11): 113201. doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/27/11/113201 [4] WAN Rong-Zheng, LI Song-Yan, FANG Hai-Ping. Effect of Center-of-Mass Motion Removal in the Molecular Dynamics Simulations [J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2010, 27(8): 084702. doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/27/8/084702 [5] ZHAO Peng-Wei, SUN Bao-Yuan, MENG Jie. Deformation Effect on the Center-of-Mass Correction Energy in Nuclei Ranging from Oxygen to Calcium [J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2009, 26(11): 112102. doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/26/11/112102 [6] Li Qian, ZHONG Wen-Xue, HU Xiang-Ming. Entangled Radiation through an Atomic Reservoir Controlled by Coherent Population Trapping [J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2008, 25(9): 3234-3237. [7] LIU Lu, GUO Tao, DENG Ke, LIU Xin-Yuan, CHEN Xu-Zong, WANG Zhong. Frequency Stability of Atomic Clocks Based on Coherent Population Trapping Resonance in 85Rb [J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2007, 24(7): 1883-1885. [8] DENG Jian-Liao, HU Zheng-Feng, HE Hui-Juan, WANG Yu-Zhu. Temperature Dependence of Dark Lines in Coherent Population Trapping [J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2006, 23(7): 1745-1748. [9] WANG Yi, HU Zheng-Feng, XU Xin-Ping, ZHANG Peng-Fei, ZHANG Hai-Chao, LIU Hua, ZHAN Ming-Sheng, WANG Yu-Zhu. Bichromatic Coherent Population Trapping Under Hanle Configuration [J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2004, 21(12): 2392-2394. [10] WANG Xiaoguang. Quantum Zeno Effect Induced by Quantum Measurement of Momentum of Atomic Mass Center [J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 1995, 12(12): 728-730. -
Supplements
Other Related Supplements
-
Cover image
45KB
-