Chin. Phys. Lett.  2013, Vol. 30 Issue (12): 122501    DOI: 10.1088/0256-307X/30/12/122501
NUCLEAR PHYSICS |
Effects of In-Medium Nucleon-Nucleon Cross Section and Nuclear Density Distribution on the Proton-Nucleus Total Reaction Cross Section
HAN Rui1,2,3, CHEN Zhi-Qiang1**, R. Wada1, ZHANG Su-Ya-La-Tu1,3, LIU Xing-Quan1,3, LIN Wei-Ping1,3, JIN Zeng-Xue1,3, HU Bi-Tao2
1Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000
2School of Nuclear Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000
3University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
Cite this article:   
HAN Rui, CHEN Zhi-Qiang, R. Wada et al  2013 Chin. Phys. Lett. 30 122501
Download: PDF(656KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract We present the proton-total reaction cross sections σR by comparing the experimental data with the Glauber model calculation using four sets of nucleon-nucleon cross sections used in literature (free nucleon-nucleon cross sections (NNCS), phenomenological NNCS, Bruckner-type NNCS and Pauli NNCS) and different nuclear densities for symmetric and asymmetric nuclei. For light symmetric target nuclei, the experimental σR data are well reproduced by the former three NNCS with the ground state density distributions of relativistic mean-field theory. On the other hand, for asymmetry heavier target nuclei, the calculations of the σR data depend significantly on the nuclear density distribution at large radius in the low energy region. The experimental σR of these nuclei are well reproduced by the empirical 3 pF density distribution and the in-medium NNCS. The neutron surface distributions are also discussed based on the 3 pF nuclear charge distributions.
Received: 09 September 2013      Published: 13 December 2013
PACS:  25.40.-h (Nucleon-induced reactions)  
  24.10.-i (Nuclear reaction models and methods)  
  13.75.Cs  
TRENDMD:   
URL:  
https://cpl.iphy.ac.cn/10.1088/0256-307X/30/12/122501       OR      https://cpl.iphy.ac.cn/Y2013/V30/I12/122501
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
HAN Rui
CHEN Zhi-Qiang
R. Wada
ZHANG Su-Ya-La-Tu
LIU Xing-Quan
LIN Wei-Ping
JIN Zeng-Xue
HU Bi-Tao
[1] Rafi Syed et al 2011 Phys. Rev. C 84 037604
[2] Ou L et al 2008 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 35 055101
[3] Iida K et al 2011 Prog. Theor. Phys. 126 1091
[4] Tanihata I et al 1985 Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 2676
[5] Zelalem B A et al 2011 Phys. Rev. C 84 044606
[6] Auce A et al 2005 Phys. Rev. C 71 064606
[7] Abu-Ibrahim B et al 2008 Phys. Rev. C 77 034607
[8] Tanihata I et al 1992 Phys. Lett. B 289 261
[9] Feng J et al 1993 Phys. Lett. B 305 9
[10] Shen W Q et al 1989 Nucl. Phys. A 491 130
[11] Kox S et al 1987 Phys. Rev. C 35 1678
[12] Glauber R J 1959 Lectures on Theoretical Physics (New York: Interscience) vol I
[13] Miller M L et al 2007 Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 57 205
[14] Vitturi A and Zardi F 1987 Phys. Rev. C 36 1404
[15] Lenzi S M et al 1989 Phys. Rev. C 40 2114
[16] Charagi S K and Gupta S K 1990 Phys. Rev. C 41 1610
[17] De Vismes A et al 2000 Phys. Rev. C 62 064612
[18] Cai X Z et al 1998 Phys. Rev. C 58 572
[19] Warner R E et al 1999 Phys. Rev. C 59 1215
[20] Ahmad I et al 2002 Phys. Rev. C 65 054607
[21] Bertsch G F and Das Gupta S 1988 Phys. Rep. 160 189
[22] Yuan Y et al 2010 Phys. Rev. C 81 034913
[23] Kohno M et al 1998 Phys. Rev. C 57 3495
[24] Cai Y H et al 1996 Chin. Phys. Lett. 13 420
[25] Zhang Y X et al 2007 Phys. Rev. C 75 034615
[26] Liu J Y et al 2003 Chin. Phys. Lett. 20 832
[27] Li G Q and Machleidt R 1993 Phys. Rev. C 48 1702
[28] Li G Q and Machleidt R 1994 Phys. Rev. C 49 566
[29] Li Q F et al 2000 Phys. Rev. C 62 014606
[30] Fuchs C et al 2001 Phys. Rev. C 64 024003
[31] Sammarruca F and Krastev P 2006 Phys. Rev. C 73 014001
[32] Bertulani C A and De Conti C 2010 Phys. Rev. C 81 064603
[33] Madani J H et al 2010 Nucl. Phys. A 839 42
[34] Liu J Y et al 2007 Acta Phys. Sin. 56 1339 (in Chinese)
[35] Warda M et al 2010 Phys. Rev. C 81 054309
[36] Ring P 1996 Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 37 193
[37] Kohn W and Sham L J 1965 Phys. Rev. 137 A1697
[38] De Vries H et al 1987 At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 36 495
[39] Clementel E and Villi C 1955 Nuovo Cimento 1 176
[40] Carlson R F 1996 At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 63 93
[41] Zhong C et al 2003 Chin. Phys. Lett. 20 629
[42] Shukla P 2003 Phys. Rev. C 67 054607
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] Xiao-Jun Sun, Feng-Qun Zhou, Yue-Li Song, Yong Li, Peng-Fei Ji, Xin-Yi Chang. Measurements of the Cross-sections of Produced Short-Lived Nuclei Induced by Neutrons around 14MeV on Isotopes of Tungsten[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2019, 36(11): 122501
[2] ZHANG Guo-Hui**, LIU Xiang, LIU Jia-Ming, XUE Zhi-Hua, WU Hao, CHEN Jin-Xiang . Measurement of Cross Sections for the 10B(n,α)7Li Reaction at 4.0 and 5.0MeV Using an Asymmetrical Twin Gridded Ionization Chamber[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2011, 28(8): 122501
[3] OU Li, LI Zhu-Xia, WU Xi-Zhen, SUN Wei-Li. Disentangling the Effects of Thickness of the Neutron Skin and Symmetry Potential in Nucleon Induced Reactions on Sn Isotopes[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2009, 26(5): 122501
[4] S. Soheyli. Energy and Mass Distributions of Induced-Fission of 197Au Nucleus by 29MeV Protons[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2007, 24(6): 122501
[5] DUAN Chun-Gui, , CUI Shu-Wen, SHEN Peng-Nian, LI Guang-Lie,. Energy Loss of Fast Quarks in Nuclear Drell-Yan Dimuon Production[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2004, 21(8): 122501
[6] PENG Ru, XU Xiao-Ming, ZHOU Dai-Cui. Baryonic Effect on XcJ Suppression in Au+Au Collisions at RHIC Energies[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2004, 21(6): 122501
[7] DUAN Chun-Gui, , SHI Li-Jie, SHEN Peng-Nian, LI Guang-Lie,. Nuclear Effects in Polarized Proton--Deuteron Drell-Yan Processes[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2004, 21(3): 122501
[8] DUAN Chun-Gui, WANG Hong-Min, LI Guang-Lie,. High-Energy Proton-Induced Dimuon Production from Nuclei[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2002, 19(4): 122501
[9] YE Bang-jiao, FAN Yang-mei, Yoshimi KASUGA, Yujiro IKEDA, ZHOU Xian-yi, HAN Rong-dian. Reduced Sputtering Yields Induced by Fast Neutrons[J]. Chin. Phys. Lett., 1999, 16(11): 122501
Viewed
Full text


Abstract