THE PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS |
|
|
|
|
Cosmic String Universes Embedded with Viscosity |
Koijam Manihar Singh1*, Kangujam Priyokumar Singh2**
|
1Department of Mathematics, Sambalpur University, Orissa-768019, India
2Department of Mathematics IGC, Akampat, Imphal-795001, (Manipur University), India
|
|
Cite this article: |
Koijam Manihar Singh, Kangujam Priyokumar Singh 2011 Chin. Phys. Lett. 28 101102 |
|
|
Abstract We study string cosmological models with attached particles in LRS BI type space time. The dynamical and physical properties of such universes are studied, and the possibility that during the evolution of the universe the strings disappear, leaving only the particles, is also discussed. It is found that bulk viscosity plays a large role in the evolution of the universe. In these models we find critical instances of when there was a "Bounce". The studied models are found to be of an inflationary type, and since a desirable feature of a meaningful string cosmological model is the presence of an inflationary epoch in the very early stages of evolution, our models can be thought of as realistic universes.
|
Keywords:
11.27.+d
98.80.Cq
98.80.-k
|
|
Received: 29 January 2011
Published: 28 September 2011
|
|
PACS: |
11.27.+d
|
(Extended classical solutions; cosmic strings, domain walls, texture)
|
|
98.80.Cq
|
(Particle-theory and field-theory models of the early Universe (including cosmic pancakes, cosmic strings, chaotic phenomena, inflationary universe, etc.))
|
|
98.80.-k
|
(Cosmology)
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Kalb M and Ramond P 1974 Phys. Rev. D 9 2273
[2] Kalb M 1978 Phys. Rev. D 17 2713
[3] Letelier P S 1977 Phys. Rev. D 15 1055
[4] Lund F and Regge T 1976 Phys. Rev. D 14 1524
[5] Stachel J 1980 Phys. Rev. D 21 2171
[6] Letelier P S 1983 Phys. Rev. D 28 2414
[7] Vilenkin A 1981 Phys. Rev. D 23 853
[8] Gott G R 1985 Appl. Phys. J. 288 422
[9] Krori K D, Choudhary T, Mahanta C R and Mazumdar A 1990 Gen. Rel. Grav. 22 123
[10] Banerjee S and Bhui B 1990 Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 247 57
[11] Tikekar R and Patel L K 1994 Gen. Rel. Grav. 26 647
[12] Bhattacharjee R and Baruah K K 2001 Pure Appl. Math. 32 47
[13] Kibble T W B 1976 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 9 1389
[14] Zeldovich Y 1980 Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 192 663
[15] Hogan C J and Rees M J 1984 Nature 311 109
[16] Myung Y S, Cho B H, Kim Y and Park Y J 1986 Phys. Rev. D 33 2944
[17] Yavuz I and Yilmaz I 1996 Astrophys. Space Sci. 245 131
[18] Gundalach C and Ortiz M E 1990 Phys. Rev. D 42 2521
[19] Tikekar R and Patel L K 1992 Gen. Rel. Grav. 24 397
[20] Chakraborty S and Chakraborty A K 1992 J. Math. Phys. 33 2336
[21] Bali R and Sharma K 2001 Astrophys. Space Sci. 275 485
[22] Barros A and Romero C 1995 J. Math. Phys. 36 5800
[23] Rahman F, Chakraborty N, Begum N, Hossain M and Kalam M 2003 Pramana J. Phys. 60 1153
[24] Sen A A, Banerjee N and Banerjee A 1996 Phys. Rev. D 53 5508
[25] Sen A A 2000 Pramana J. Phys. 55 369
[26] Barros A, Sen A A and Romero C 2001 Braz. J. Phys. 31 507
[27] Reddy D R K and Naidu R L 2007 Astrophys. Space Sci. 307 395
[28] Reddy D R K 2003 Astrophys. Space Sci. 288 365
[29] Reddy D R K 2005 Astrophys. Space Sci. 300 381
[30] Reddy D R K 2006 Astrophys. Space Sci. 305 139
[31] Mohanty G and Mahanta K L 2007 Astrophys. Space Sci. 312 301
[32] Mohanty G, Sahoo R R and Mahanta K L 2007 Astrophys. Space Sci. 312 321
[33] Apostolopoulos P S and Tsamparlis M 2001 Class. Quantum Grav. 18 3775 |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|