Original Articles |
|
|
|
|
Mechanism of NBTI Recovery under Negative Voltage Stress |
CAO Yan-Rong, HU Shi-Gang, MA Xiao-Hua, HAO Yue |
1School of Microelectronics, Xidian University, Xi'an 7100712Key Lab of Wide Band-Gap Semiconductor Materials and Devices, Xi'an710071 |
|
Cite this article: |
CAO Yan-Rong, HU Shi-Gang, MA Xiao-Hua et al 2008 Chin. Phys. Lett. 25 3393-3396 |
|
|
Abstract Recovery phenomenon is observed under negative gate voltage stress which is smaller than the previous degradation stress. We focus on the drain current to study the degradation and recovery of negative bias temperature instability (NBTI) with a real-time method. By this method, different recovery phenomena among different size devices are observed. Under negative recovery stress, the drain current gradually recovers for the large size devices and gets into recovery saturation when long recovery time is involved. For small-size devices, a step-like recovery of drain current is observed. The recovery of the drain current is mainly caused by the holes detrapping and tunnelling back to the channel surface which are trapped in oxide. The model of hole detrapping explains the recovery under negative voltage stress reasonably.
|
Keywords:
73.40.Qv
85.30.Tv
|
|
Received: 23 July 2008
Published: 29 August 2008
|
|
PACS: |
73.40.Qv
|
(Metal-insulator-semiconductor structures (including semiconductor-to-insulator))
|
|
85.30.Tv
|
(Field effect devices)
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Chen Y F et al 2000 Integrated Reliability Workshop(California, 23--26 October 2000) p 98 [2] Li Z H, Liu H X and Hao Y 2006 Chin. Phys. 15833 [3] Mahapatra S et al 2004 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 51 1371 [4] Cao Y R et al 2007 Chin. Phys. 16 1140 [5] Rashkeev S N et al 2001 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci 48 2086 [6] Deal B E et al 1967 J. Electrochem. Soc. 114266 [7] Yamamoto T et al 1999 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 46 921 [8] Jha N K et al 2005 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 26687 [9] Zhu S et al 2006 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 53 1805 [10] Zhu S et al 2006 J. Appl. Phys. 99 064510-1 [11] Yang T et al 2005 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 26758 [12] Mahapatra S et al 2006 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 53 1583 [13] Chakravarthy S, Krishnan A T, Reddy V, Machala C F andKrishnan S 2004 IEEE International Reliability PhysicsSymposium Proceedings (Arizona 25--29 April 2004) 273 [14] Alam M A 2003 International Electron DevicesMeeting (Washington, 8--10 December 2003) 345 [15] Rangan S et al 2003 IEEE International ElectronDevices Meeting (Washington, 8--10 December 2003) 341 [16] Chen G et al 2002 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. { \bf23 734 [17] Kaczer B et al 2005 IEEE International ReliabilityPhysics Symposium Proceedings (California, 17--21 April 2005) 381 [18] Ershov M et al 2003 Appl. Phys. Lett. 83 1647 [19] Chen G et al 2003 IEEE International ReliabilityPhysics Symposium Proceedings (Texas, 30 March--4 April 2003) p 196 [20] Parthasarathy CR et al 2006 IEEE InternationalReliability Physics Symposium Proceedings (California, 26--30 March2006) p 471 [21] Yang J B et al 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 88172109-1 [22] Schroder D K and Babcock J A 2003 J. Appl. Phys. 94 1 |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|