Original Articles |
|
|
|
|
Influence of Deviation on Optical Transmission through Aperiodic Superlattices |
YIN Hai-Long1;YANG Xiang-Bo1,2;LAN Sheng2;HU Wei2 |
1MOE Key Laboratory of Laser Life Science and Institute of Laser Life Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 5106312Laboratory of Photonic Information Technology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631 |
|
Cite this article: |
YIN Hai-Long, YANG Xiang-Bo, LAN Sheng et al 2007 Chin. Phys. Lett. 24 3129-3132 |
|
|
Abstract We propose a deviation model and study the influences of the relative error and sensitivity of a machine on the transmission coefficients (TCs) of Fibonacci superlattices. It is found that for a system with fewer layers, the influence of deviation can be ignored. When superlattices become more complicated, they may be fabricated by a machine with suitable relative error and possess the designed value of TC. However, when the number of system layers exceeds some critical value, superlattices should be manufactured only by precise machines. The influence of the sensitivity is also discussed.
|
Keywords:
42.25.Bs
01.50.Zv
78.67.Pt
|
|
Received: 17 May 2007
Published: 23 October 2007
|
|
PACS: |
42.25.Bs
|
(Wave propagation, transmission and absorption)
|
|
01.50.Zv
|
(Errors in physics classroom materials)
|
|
78.67.Pt
|
(Multilayers; superlattices; photonic structures; metamaterials)
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Shechtman D, Blech I, Gratias D and Cahn J 1984 Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 1951 [2] Kohmoto M, Sutherland B and Iguchi K 1987 Phys. Rev.Lett. 58 2436 [3] Gellermann W, Kohmoto M, Sutherland B and Taylor P 1994 Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 633 [4] Huang X, Liu Y and Mo D 1993 Solid State Commun. 87 601 [5] Wang Y, Huang X and Gong C 2000 Chin. Phys. Lett. 17 498 [6] Peng R, Huang X, Qiu F, Wang M, Hu A and Jiang S 2002 Appl. Phys. Lett. 80 3063 [7] Qin Y, Su H and Tang S 2003 Appl. Phys. Lett. 83 1071 [8] Yang X, Liu Y and Fu X 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 4545 [9] Riklund R and Severin M 1988 J. Phys. C 21 3217 [10] Klauzer-Kruszyna, Salejda W and Tyc M 2004 Optik (Stuttgart) 115 257 Klauzer-Kruszyna, Salejda W and Tyc M 2004 Optik (Stuttgart) 115 267 [11] Qin Y, Zhu Y, Zhu S, Luo G, Ma J and Ming N 1999 Appl.Phys. Lett. 75 448 [12] Li F and Yang X 2005 Physica B 368 64 [13] Tamura S and Nori F 1989 Phys. Rev. B 40 9790 [14] Liu N 1997 Phys. Rev. B 55 3543 [15] Wang X, Grimm U and Schreiber M 2000 Phys. Rev. B 62 14020 [16] Chattopadhyay S and Chakrabarti A 2000 J. Phys.:Condens. Matter 12 5681 [17] Negro L, Stolfi M, Yi Y, Michel J, Duan X, Kimerling L,LeBlanc J and Haavisto J 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 5186 [18] Jiang X, Zhang Y, Feng S, Huang K, Yi Y and Joannopoulos J2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 86 20110 [19] Chen F and Yang X 2005 Mod. Phys. Lett. B 19 655 [20] Chen F and Yang X 2005 Phys. Status Solidi B 242 2509 [21] Peng R, Wang M, Hu A, Jiang S, Jin G and Feng D 1998 Phys. Rev. B 57 1544 [22] Huang X, Wang Y and Gong C 1999 J. Phys.: Condens.Matter 11 7645 [23] Chen F, Yang X and Xing D 2004 Physica B 351 19 |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|