Subdiffusion of Dipolar Gas in One-Dimensional Quasiperiodic Potentials
BAI Xiao-Dong, XUE Ju-Kui**
Key Laboratory of Atomic & Molecular Physics and Functional Materials of Gansu Province, College of Physics and Electronics Engineering, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070
Abstract ：Considering the discrete nonlinear Schr?dinger model with dipole-dipole interactions (DDIs), we comparatively and numerically study the effects of contact interaction, DDI and disorder on the properties of diffusion of dipolar condensate in one-dimensional quasi-periodic potentials. Due to the coupled effects of the contact interaction and the DDI, some new and interesting mechanisms are found: both the DDI and the contact interaction can destroy localization and lead to a subdiffusive growth of the second moment of the wave packet. However, compared with the contact interaction, the effect of DDI on the subdiffusion is stronger. Furthermore and interestingly, we find that when the contact interaction (λ 1 ) and DDI (λ 2 ) satisfy λ1 ?2λ2 , the property of the subdiffusion depends only on contact interaction; when λ1 ?2λ2 , the property of the subdiffusion is completely determined by DDI. Remarkably, we numerically give the critical value of disorder strength v* for different values of contact interaction and DDI. When the disorder strength v≥v* , the wave packet is localized. On the contrary, when the disorder strength v≤v* , the wave packet is subdiffusive.
出版日期: 2014-12-23
:
03.75.Lm
(Tunneling, Josephson effect, Bose-Einstein condensates in periodic potentials, solitons, vortices, and topological excitations)
64.60.Cn
(Order-disorder transformations)
05.45.Yv
(Solitons)
[1] Anderson P W 1958 Phys. Rev. 109 1492 Nature 390 6711999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 2278 2000 Nature 404 850 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 063904 2008 Nature 453 895 2007 Nature 449 876 2010 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 22 273201 2004 Rev. Mod. Phys. 76 195 1992 Phys. Rep. 216 1 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 053901 2007 Nature 446 52 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 013906 2010 Nat. Phys. 6 87 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 170410 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 180402 2002 Phys. Rev. A 66 023603 2012 Phys. Rev. E 86 066605 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 1787 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 084103 2010 Europhys. Lett. 90 10015 2010 Phys. Rev. E 81 017601 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 053612 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 013901 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 230403 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 094101 2009 Phys. Rev. E 79 026205 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 024101 2009 Phys. Rev. E 80 037201 2010 Phys. Rev. E 82 016208 2010 Chem. Phys. 375 548 2010 Europhys. Lett. 91 30001 2011 Phys. Rev. E 84 016205 Ann. Isr. Phys. Soc. 3 1331955 Proc. Phys. Soc. London Sect. A 68 874 2007 Phys. Rev. B 75 205120 1995 Phys. Rev. B 52 231 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 053606 2009 Eur. Phys. J. B 68 435 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 023606 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 130401 1998 Nature 392 151 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 200404 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 050401 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 023613 2002 Phys. Rev. A 66 051601(R) 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 061607(R) 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 053609 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 013633 2008 Nat. Phys. 4 218 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 140402 2013 Phys. Rev. E 88 062916 2005 Phys. Rev. A 71 025601 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 033428 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 130404 2009 New J. Phys. 11 033023 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75 063404 2003 Nature 424 817 2012 New J. Phys. 14 103036 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 013614 2010 Phys. Rev. E 82 031122
[1]
.
[2]
.
[3]
.
[4]
.
[5]
.
[6]
.
[7]
.
[8]
.
[9]
.
[10]
.
[11]
.
[12]
.
[13]
.
[14]
.
[15]
.
2015, Vol. 32 
