Scale-Free Brain Networks Based on the Event-Related Potential during Visual Spatial Attention
LI Ling**, JIN Zhen-Lan
Key Laboratory for NeuroInformation of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054
Scale-Free Brain Networks Based on the Event-Related Potential during Visual Spatial Attention
LI Ling**, JIN Zhen-Lan
Key Laboratory for NeuroInformation of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054
摘要The human brain is thought of as one of the most complex dynamical systems in the universe. The network view of the dynamical system has emerged since the discovery of scale-free networks. Brain functional networks, which represent functional associations among brain regions, are extracted by measuring the temporal correlations from electroencephalogram data. We measure the topological properties of the brain functional network, including degree distribution, average degree, clustering coefficient and the shortest path length, to compare the networks of multi-channel event-related potential activity between visual spatial attention and unattention conditions. It is found that the degree distribution of the brain functional networks under both the conditions is a power law distribution, which reflects a scale-free property. Moreover, the scaling exponent of the attention condition is significantly smaller than that of the unattention condition. However, the degree distribution of equivalent random networks does not follow the power law distribution. In addition, the clustering coefficient of these random networks is smaller than those of brain networks, and the shortest path length of these random networks is large and comparable with those of brain networks. Our results, typical of scale-free networks, indicate that the scaling exponent of brain activity could reflect different cognitive processes.
Abstract：The human brain is thought of as one of the most complex dynamical systems in the universe. The network view of the dynamical system has emerged since the discovery of scale-free networks. Brain functional networks, which represent functional associations among brain regions, are extracted by measuring the temporal correlations from electroencephalogram data. We measure the topological properties of the brain functional network, including degree distribution, average degree, clustering coefficient and the shortest path length, to compare the networks of multi-channel event-related potential activity between visual spatial attention and unattention conditions. It is found that the degree distribution of the brain functional networks under both the conditions is a power law distribution, which reflects a scale-free property. Moreover, the scaling exponent of the attention condition is significantly smaller than that of the unattention condition. However, the degree distribution of equivalent random networks does not follow the power law distribution. In addition, the clustering coefficient of these random networks is smaller than those of brain networks, and the shortest path length of these random networks is large and comparable with those of brain networks. Our results, typical of scale-free networks, indicate that the scaling exponent of brain activity could reflect different cognitive processes.
LI Ling**;JIN Zhen-Lan
. Scale-Free Brain Networks Based on the Event-Related Potential during Visual Spatial Attention[J]. 中国物理快报, 2011, 28(4): 48701-048701.
LI Ling**, JIN Zhen-Lan
. Scale-Free Brain Networks Based on the Event-Related Potential during Visual Spatial Attention. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2011, 28(4): 48701-048701.
[1] Watts D J and Strogatz S H 1998 Nature 393 440
[2] Barabási A L and Albert R 1999 Science 286 509
[3] Wang X F and Chen G 2003 IEEE Circ. Syst. Mag. 3 6
[4] Boccaletti S, Latora V, Moreno Y, Chavez M and Hwang D U 2006 Phys. Rep. 424 175
[5] Sporns O and Honey Ch J 2006 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 51 19219
[6] Stam C J 2004 Neurosci. Lett. 355 25
[7] Bullmore E and Sporns O 2009 Nature Rev. Neurosci. 10 186
[8] He Y and Evans A 2010 Curr. Opin. Neurol. 23 341
[9] Stam C J and Reijneveld J C 2007 Nonlin. Biomed. Phys. 1 3
[10] Shin Ch-W and Kim S 2006 Phys. Rev. E 74 045101
[11] He Y, Chen Z J and Evans A 2007 Cereb. Cortex 17 2407
[12] Percha B, Dzakpasu R and Zochowski M 2005 Phys. Rev. E 72 031909
[13] Roxin A, Riecke H and Solla S A 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 198101
[14] Eguiluz V M, Chialvo D R, Cecchi G A, Baliki M, and Apkarian A V 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 018102
[15] Stam C J and de Bruin E A 2004 Hum. Brain Mapp. 22 97
[16] Stam C J, Jones B F, Nolte G, Breakspear M and Scheltens P 2007 Cereb. Cortex 17 92
[17] Stam C J, de Haan W, Daffertshofer A, Jones B F, Manshanden I, van Cappellen van Walsum A M, Montez T, Verbunt J P, de Munck J C, van Dijk B W, Berendse H W and Scheltens P 2009 Brain 132 213
[18] Chavez M, Hwang D-U, Hentschel H G E and Boccaletti S 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 218701
[19] Chavez M, Hwang D-U, Amann A and Boccaletti S 2006 Chaos 16 015106
[20] Buiatti M, Papo D, Baudonnière P M and van Vreeswijk C 2007 Neurosci. 146 1400
[21] Linkenkaer-Hansen K, Nikouline V V, Palva J M and Ilmoniemi R J 2001 J. Neurosci. 21 1370
[22] Nikulin V V and Brismar T 2004 Clin. Neurophysiol. 115 1896
[23] Stam C J, Montez T, Jones B F, Rombouts S A R B, Made Y van der, Pijnenburg Y A L and Scheltens P H 2005 Clin. Neurophysiol. 116 708
[24] Clark V P and Hillyard S A 1996 J. Cogn. Neurosci. 8 387
[25] Li L, Yao D, and Yin G 2009 Brain Res. 1282 84
[26] Ferri R, Rundo F, Bruni O, Terzano M G and Stam C J 2008 Clin. Neurophysiol. 119 2026
[27] Ferri R, Rundo F, Bruni O, Terzano M G and Stam C J 2007 Clin. Neurophysiol. 118 449
[28] Strogatz S H 2001 Nature 410 268
[29] Cohen R and Havlin S 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 058701
2011, Vol. 28 
