摘要The response of synchronously firing groups of population retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) to natural movies (NMs) and pseudo-random white-noise checker-board flickering (CB, as control) are investigated using an information-theoretic algorithm. The main results are: (1) the population RGCs tend to fire in synchrony far more frequently than expected by chance during both NM and CB stimulation; (2) more synchronous groups could be formed and each group contains more neurons under NM than CB stimulation; (3) the individual neurons also participate in more groups and have more distinct partners in NM than CB stimulation. All these results suggest that the synchronized firings in RGCs are more extensive and diverse, which may account for more effective information processing in representing the natural visual environment.
Abstract：The response of synchronously firing groups of population retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) to natural movies (NMs) and pseudo-random white-noise checker-board flickering (CB, as control) are investigated using an information-theoretic algorithm. The main results are: (1) the population RGCs tend to fire in synchrony far more frequently than expected by chance during both NM and CB stimulation; (2) more synchronous groups could be formed and each group contains more neurons under NM than CB stimulation; (3) the individual neurons also participate in more groups and have more distinct partners in NM than CB stimulation. All these results suggest that the synchronized firings in RGCs are more extensive and diverse, which may account for more effective information processing in representing the natural visual environment.
[1] Usrey W M and Reid R C 1999 Annu. Rev. Physiol. 61 435
[2] Singer W 1999 Neuron 24 49
[3] Nirenberg S and Latham P E 1998 Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 8 488
[4] Petersen R S, Panzeri S and Diamond M E 2002 Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 12 441
[5] Tan J and Luo M M 2010 Acta Biophysica Sinica 26 194 (in Chinese)
[6] Meister M, Pine J and Baylor D A 1994 J. Neurosci. Methods 51 95
[7] Brown E N, Kass R E and Mitra P P 2004 Nat. Neurosci. 7 456
[8] Wang Y N, Tang Y Q, Pan J W and Lin L N 2010 Acta Biophysica Sinica 26 397 (in Chinese)
[9] Schnitzer M J and Meister M 2003 Neuron 37 499
[10] Chen A H, Zhou Y, Gong H Q and Liang P J 2005 Neuroreport 16 371
[11] Liu X, Zhou Y, Gong H Q and Liang P J 2007 Brain Res. 1177 37
[12] van Hateren J H and van der Schaaf A 1998 Proc. Biol. Sci. 265 359
[13] Meister M, Lagnado L and Baylor D A 1995 Science 270 1207
[14] Cai C F, Zhang Y Y, Liu X, Liang P J and Zhang P M 2008 Chin. Phys. Lett. 25 1595
[15] Hosoya T, Baccus S A, Meister M 2005 Nature 436 71
[16] Usrey W M, Alonso J M, Reid R C 2000 J. Neurosci. 20 5461
[17] Olshausen B A, Field D J 2004 Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14 481
2011, Vol. 28 
