摘要We present an analysis of ring-like and jet-like events in terms of factorial correlations and oscillatory multiplicity moments of 32S–Ag/Br interactions at 200 A GeV. The investigation reveals that the correlated moments increase with decrease in bin−bin separation D, following the power law, which suggests the presence of an intermittent nature of self−similar dynamical fluctuations pattern for ring-like and jet-like events. The analysis further shows that the strength of the non-statistical fluctuations is larger for jet-like events than those of ring-like events and total events. However, ring-like and jet-like events are not to be consistent with the total events of the α model of intermittency. To go beyond the lower order correlation, the oscillatory multiplicity moments are used to study the higher order correlation. The ratios Hq (cumulant over factorial moments, Kq/Fq) are determined for ring-like, jet-like and the total events. The presence of few-particle short range correlation is established. It is extremely interesting to observe that the oscillations of ring-like events are different from the jet-like events and the total events. However, in almost all the cases, the simulated interactions fail to replicate the experimental results.
Abstract：We present an analysis of ring-like and jet-like events in terms of factorial correlations and oscillatory multiplicity moments of 32S–Ag/Br interactions at 200 A GeV. The investigation reveals that the correlated moments increase with decrease in bin−bin separation D, following the power law, which suggests the presence of an intermittent nature of self−similar dynamical fluctuations pattern for ring-like and jet-like events. The analysis further shows that the strength of the non-statistical fluctuations is larger for jet-like events than those of ring-like events and total events. However, ring-like and jet-like events are not to be consistent with the total events of the α model of intermittency. To go beyond the lower order correlation, the oscillatory multiplicity moments are used to study the higher order correlation. The ratios Hq (cumulant over factorial moments, Kq/Fq) are determined for ring-like, jet-like and the total events. The presence of few-particle short range correlation is established. It is extremely interesting to observe that the oscillations of ring-like events are different from the jet-like events and the total events. However, in almost all the cases, the simulated interactions fail to replicate the experimental results.
(Relativistic heavy-ion collisions (collisions induced by light ions studied to calibrate relativistic heavy-ion collisions should be classified under both 25.75.-q and sections 13 or 25 appropriate to the light ions))
Prabir Kumar Haldar**;Sanjib Kumar Manna
. Factorial Correlators and Oscillatory Multiplicity Moments at the CERN SPS Energy for Ring-Like and Jet-Like Events[J]. 中国物理快报, 2011, 28(1): 12502-012502.
Prabir Kumar Haldar**, Sanjib Kumar Manna
. Factorial Correlators and Oscillatory Multiplicity Moments at the CERN SPS Energy for Ring-Like and Jet-Like Events. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2011, 28(1): 12502-012502.
[1] Bialas A and Peschanski R 1986 Nucl. Phys. B 273 703
[2] Bialas A and Peschanski R 1988 Nucl. Phys. B 308 857
[3] Ajinenko I V 1989 Phys. Lett. B 222 306
[4] Holynski R 1989 Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 733
[5] Adamovich M I et al 1991 Phys. Lett. B 263 539
[6] Buschbech B et al 1988 Phys. Lett. B 215 788
[7] Derado I et al 1990 Z. Phys. C 47 23
[8] Bialas A and Hwa R C 1991 Phys. Lett. B 253 436
[9] Ochs W and Woseik J 1988 Phys. Lett. B 214 617
[10] Carruthers P et al 1989 Phys. Lett. B 222 487
[11] Carruthers P and Sarcevic I 1989 Phys. Rev. Lett. 63 1562
[12] Hwa R C 1990 Phys. Rev. D 41 1456
[13] Shivpuri R K and Verma V K 1993 Phys. Rev. D 47 123
[14] Adamovich M et al 1993 J. Phys. G 19 2035
[15] Naghy E and Khalek S 1993 Phys. Lett. B 299 370
[16] Dremin I M 2006 Nucl. Phys. A 767 233
[17] Ghosh D et al 2006 Chin. Phys. Lett. 23 815
[18] Ghosh D et al 2007 Astro Particle Phys. 27 127
[19] Ghosh D et al 1995 Phys. Rev. C 52 4 2092
[20] Adamovich M et al 1999 Eur. Phys. J. A 5 429
[21] Carruthers P et al 1991 Phys. Lett. B 254 258
[22] Dremin I M 1993 Phys. Lett. B 313 209
2011, Vol. 28 
