摘要We illustrate the dichotomy of classical/quantum correlations by virtue of monogamy. More precisely, we show that correlations in a bipartite state are classical if and only if each party of the state can be perfectly correlated with other ancillary systems. In particular, this means that if there are quantum correlations between two parties, then the classical (as well as quantum) correlating capabilities of the two parties with other systems have to be strictly reduced.
Abstract：We illustrate the dichotomy of classical/quantum correlations by virtue of monogamy. More precisely, we show that correlations in a bipartite state are classical if and only if each party of the state can be perfectly correlated with other ancillary systems. In particular, this means that if there are quantum correlations between two parties, then the classical (as well as quantum) correlating capabilities of the two parties with other systems have to be strictly reduced.
(Foundations of quantum mechanics; measurement theory)
引用本文:
LUO Shun-Long;LI Nan
. Quantum Correlations Reduce Classical Correlations with Ancillary Systems[J]. 中国物理快报, 2010, 27(12): 120304-120304.
LUO Shun-Long, LI Nan
. Quantum Correlations Reduce Classical Correlations with Ancillary Systems. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2010, 27(12): 120304-120304.
[1] Coffman V, Kundu J and Wootters W K 2000 Phys. Rev. A 61 052306
[2] Terhal B M 2004 IBM J. Res. Development 48 71
[3] Yang D 2006 Phys. Lett. A 360 249
[4] Osborne T J and Verstraete F 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 220503
[5] Cai J M, Zhou Z W, Zhang S and Guo G C 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75 052324
[6] Adesso G and Illuminati F 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 150501
[7] Ou Y C and Fan H 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75 062308
[8] Ou Y C, Fan H and Fei S M 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 012311
[9] Yu C S and Song H S 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 032329
[10] Seevinck M 2010 Quantum Inf. Processing 9 273
[11] Luo S 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 022301
[12] Werner R F 1989 Phys. Rev. A 40 4277
[13] Piani M, Horodecki P and Horodecki R 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 090502
[14] Li N and Luo S 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 024303
[15] Ollivier H, Poulin D and Zurek W H 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 042113
[16] Luo S and Sun W 2009 Theoret. Math. Phys. 160 1316
[17] Luo S and Zhang Q 2009 J. Stat. Phys. 136 165
[18] Wu S, Poulsen U V and M ølmer K 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 032319
2010, Vol. 27 
