摘要Although a compensation device can correct aberrations of human eyes, the effect will be degraded by its misalignment, especially for high-order aberration correction. We calculate the positioning tolerance of correction device for high-order aberrations, and within what degree the correcting effect is better than low-order aberration (defocus and astigmatism) correction. With fixed certain misalignment within the positioning tolerance, we calculate the residual wavefront rms aberration of the first-6 to first-35 terms along with the 3rd--5th terms of aberrations corrected, and the combined first-13 terms of aberrations are also studied under the same quantity of misalignment. However, the correction effect of high-order aberrations does not meliorate along with the increase of the high-order terms under some misalignment, moreover, some simple combined terms correction can achieve similar result as complex combinations. These results suggest that it is unnecessary to correct too much the terms of high-order aberrations which are difficult to accomplish in practice, and gives confidence to correct high-order aberrations out of the laboratory.
Abstract：Although a compensation device can correct aberrations of human eyes, the effect will be degraded by its misalignment, especially for high-order aberration correction. We calculate the positioning tolerance of correction device for high-order aberrations, and within what degree the correcting effect is better than low-order aberration (defocus and astigmatism) correction. With fixed certain misalignment within the positioning tolerance, we calculate the residual wavefront rms aberration of the first-6 to first-35 terms along with the 3rd--5th terms of aberrations corrected, and the combined first-13 terms of aberrations are also studied under the same quantity of misalignment. However, the correction effect of high-order aberrations does not meliorate along with the increase of the high-order terms under some misalignment, moreover, some simple combined terms correction can achieve similar result as complex combinations. These results suggest that it is unnecessary to correct too much the terms of high-order aberrations which are difficult to accomplish in practice, and gives confidence to correct high-order aberrations out of the laboratory.
ZHAO Hao-Xin;XU Bing;XUE Li-Xia;DAI Yun;LIU Qian;RAO Xue-Jun. Influence of Misalignment on High-Order Aberration Correction for Normal Human Eyes[J]. 中国物理快报, 2008, 25(4): 1309-1312.
ZHAO Hao-Xin, XU Bing, XUE Li-Xia, DAI Yun, LIU Qian, RAO Xue-Jun. Influence of Misalignment on High-Order Aberration Correction for Normal Human Eyes. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2008, 25(4): 1309-1312.
[1] Zhu Y, Gao Y F and Wan G M 2001 New Diagnostic Technique ofOphthalmology (Beijing: Science) (in Chinese) [2] Atchison D A 1992 Appl. Opt. 31 3579 [3] Morgan P B and Efron N 2006 Contact Lens and AnteriorEye 29 59 [4] Chernyak D A and Campbell C E 2003 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 20 2016 [5] Liang J Z and Williams D R 1997 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14 2873 [6] Guirao A, Porter J, Williams D R and Cox I G 2002 J. Opt.Soc. Am. A 19 1 [7] Liang J Z, Williams D R and Miller D T 1997 J. Opt. Soc.Am. A 14 2884 [8] Yoon G Y and Williams D R 2002 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19 266 [9] Bara S, Mancebo T and Moreno-Barriuso E 2000 Appl. Opt. 393413 [10] Wang Y, Wang Z Q, Guo H Q and Quan W 2005 Acta Opt.Sin. 25 1519 (in Chinese) [11] Guirao A and Williams D R 2001 J. Opt. Soc. Am. 18 1003
2008, Vol. 25 
