摘要Based on the Lie-group and Gauss--Legendre methods, two kinds of square-conservative integrators for square-conservative nonlinear evolution equations are presented. Lie-group based square-conservative integrators are linearly implicit, while Gauss--Legendre based square-conservative integrators are nonlinearly implicit and iterative schemes are needed to solve the corresponding integrators. These two kinds of integrators provide natural candidates for simulating square-conservative nonlinear evolution equations in the sense that these integrators not only preserve the square-conservative properties of the continuous equations but also are nonlinearly stable. Numerical experiments are performed to test the presented integrators.
Abstract：Based on the Lie-group and Gauss--Legendre methods, two kinds of square-conservative integrators for square-conservative nonlinear evolution equations are presented. Lie-group based square-conservative integrators are linearly implicit, while Gauss--Legendre based square-conservative integrators are nonlinearly implicit and iterative schemes are needed to solve the corresponding integrators. These two kinds of integrators provide natural candidates for simulating square-conservative nonlinear evolution equations in the sense that these integrators not only preserve the square-conservative properties of the continuous equations but also are nonlinearly stable. Numerical experiments are performed to test the presented integrators.
CHEN Jing-Bo;LIU Hong. Two Kinds of Square-Conservative Integrators for Nonlinear Evolution Equations[J]. 中国物理快报, 2008, 25(4): 1168-1171.
CHEN Jing-Bo, LIU Hong. Two Kinds of Square-Conservative Integrators for Nonlinear Evolution Equations. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2008, 25(4): 1168-1171.
[1] Sanz-serna J M and Calvo M 1994 Numerical Hamiltonian problems (London: Chapman and Hall) [2] Sidlichovsky M 1996 Celes. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 65 69 [3] Tsitouras Ch 1999 Celes. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 74 223 [4] Bridges T J et al % and Reish S2006 J. Phys. A: {\it Math.Gen. 39 5287 [5] Chen J B 2006 Geophysics 71 T151 [6] Chen J B et al % Munthe-Kaas H and Qin M Z2002 SIAM J.Numer. Anal. 39 2164 [7] Feng K 1993 The Collected Works of Feng Kang (Beijing:Defence Industrial Press) [8] Hairer E et al %, Lubich C and Warnner G2002 Geometric NumericalIntegration (Berlin: Springer) [9] Iserles A et al %, Munthe-Kaas H, N\o rsett S P and Zanna A2000 Acta Numerica 9 215 [10] Richtmyer R D and Morton K W 1967 Difference Methods forInitial-Value Problems (New York: Interscience) [11] Eng\o K 2000 BIT 40 41 [12] Cooper G J 1987 IMA J. Numer. Anal. 7 1 [13] Zabusky N J et al % and Kruskal M D1965 Phys. Rev. Lett. 15 240
2008, Vol. 25 
