摘要A new probability measure for the quantification of entanglement of pure states is introduced. Numerical computations indicate that the derived measure is equal to concurrence, up to the precision of the computer program used. Hence it also provides a physical interpretation for concurrence.
Abstract：A new probability measure for the quantification of entanglement of pure states is introduced. Numerical computations indicate that the derived measure is equal to concurrence, up to the precision of the computer program used. Hence it also provides a physical interpretation for concurrence.
Abbass Sabour;Mojtaba Jafarpour**
. A Probability Measure for Entanglement of Pure Two-Qubit Systems and a Useful Interpretation for Concurrence[J]. 中国物理快报, 2011, 28(7): 70301-070301.
Abbass Sabour, Mojtaba Jafarpour**
. A Probability Measure for Entanglement of Pure Two-Qubit Systems and a Useful Interpretation for Concurrence. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2011, 28(7): 70301-070301.
[1] Bennett C H, Brassard G, Crepeau C, Jozsa R, Peres A and Wootters W K 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 1895
[2] Murao M, Jonathan D, Plenio M B and Vedral V 1999 Phys. Rev. A 59 156
[3] Dür W and Cirac J I 2000 J. Mod. Opt. 47 247
[4] Ekert a K 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 661
[5] Bennett C H, Brassard G, and Mermin N D 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 557
[6] Deutsch D, Ekert A, Jozsa R, Macchiavello C, Popescu S and Sanpera A 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 2818
[7] Naik D S, Peterson C G, White A G, Berglund A J and Kwiat P G 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 4733
[8] Tittel W, Brendel J, Zbinden H and Gisin N 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 4737
[9] Barenco A and Ekert A 1995 J. Mod. Opt. 42 1253
[10] Hausladen P, Jozsa R, Schumacher B, Westmoreland M and Wootters W K 1996 Phys. Rev. A 54 1869
[11] Bose S, Plenio M B and Vedral V 2000 J. Mod. Opt. 47 291
[12] Hiroshima T 2001 J. Phys. A 34 6907
[13] Ziman M and Buzek V 2003 Phys. Rev. A 67 042321
[14] Mozes S, Oppenheim J and Reznik B 2005 Phys. Rev. A 71 012311
[15] Di Vincenzo D P 1995 Science 270 255
[16] Shor P W 1997 SIAM J. Comput. 26 1484
[17] Grover L K 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 325
[18] Gisin N 1991 Phys. Lett. A 154 201
[19] Bennett C H, Wiesner S J 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 2881
[20] Bennett C H, Bernstein H J, Popescu S and Schumacher B 1996 Phys. Rev. A 53 2046
[21] Vedral V, Plenio M B, Rippen M A and Knight P L 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 2275
[22] Rains E M 1999 Phys. Rev. A 60 173
[23] Bennett C H, Di Vincenzo D P, Smolin J and Wootte rs W K 1996 Phys. Rev. A 54 3824
[24] Hill S and Wootters W K 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 5022
[25] Wootters W K 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 2245
[26] Jafarpour M and Akhound a 2008 Phys. Lett. A 372 2374
[27] Gonzalez-H C T, Franco R and Silva-Valencia J 2010 Eur. J. Phys. 31 681
[28] Li D C and Cao Z L 2010 Commun. Theor. Phys. 53 659
[29] Liu L G, Tian C L, Chen P X and Yuan N C 2009 Chin. Phys. Lett. 26 060306
2011, Vol. 28 
