An analytical method is proposed to evaluate the Hugoniot parameters of preheated metallic materials by relating to its principal Hugoniot. Modelling calculations for 1100 Al, Cu and Ta show that the preheating lowers to a certain extent the shock impedance and the degree of lowering the shock impedance increases with increasing preheating temperature. The Hugoniots of 6061-T6 Al and TC4 preheated flyers at known preheating temperatures are evaluated, and are utilized to calculate the particle velocity and shock pressure using the impedance-match method based on the measured shock wave velocity and impact velocity reported in Z pinch-driven and three-stage gun-driven Hugoniot experiments. The presented method allows a reasonable evaluation for Hugoniot of the preheated metallic flyers.
An analytical method is proposed to evaluate the Hugoniot parameters of preheated metallic materials by relating to its principal Hugoniot. Modelling calculations for 1100 Al, Cu and Ta show that the preheating lowers to a certain extent the shock impedance and the degree of lowering the shock impedance increases with increasing preheating temperature. The Hugoniots of 6061-T6 Al and TC4 preheated flyers at known preheating temperatures are evaluated, and are utilized to calculate the particle velocity and shock pressure using the impedance-match method based on the measured shock wave velocity and impact velocity reported in Z pinch-driven and three-stage gun-driven Hugoniot experiments. The presented method allows a reasonable evaluation for Hugoniot of the preheated metallic flyers.
WANG Qing-Song;LAN Qiang;HU Jian-Bo;WU Jing;DAI Cheng-Da. Analytical Method to Evaluate Hugoniot of Metallic Materials with Different Initial Temperatures[J]. 中国物理快报, 2008, 25(12): 4219-4222.
WANG Qing-Song, LAN Qiang, HU Jian-Bo, WU Jing, DAI Cheng-Da. Analytical Method to Evaluate Hugoniot of Metallic Materials with Different Initial Temperatures. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2008, 25(12): 4219-4222.
[1] Mitchell C et al 1974 J. Appl. Phys. 45 3856 [2] Gathers G R 1994 Selected Topics in Shock WavePhysics and Equation of State Modeling (Singapore: WorldScientific) p 1 [3] Duffy T S and Ahrens T J 1994 J. Appl Phys. 76835 [4] Winfree N A et al 2002 Shock Compression of CondensedMatter-2001 ed Furnish M D, Thadhani N N and Horie Y (New York:AIP) p 75 [5] Knudson M D et al 2003 J. Appl. Phys. 94 4420 [6] Batani D et al 2000 Phys. Rev. B 61 9287 [7] Trunin R F 2004 High-Pressure Shock Compression ofSolids VII: Shock Waves and Extreme States of Matter edFortov V E, Al'tshuler L V Trunin R F and Funtikov A I (New York:Speinger) p 77 [8] McQueen R G et al 1970 High-Velocity ImpactPhenomena ed Kinslow R (New York: Academic) p 293 [9] Mitchell A C and Nellis W J 1981 J. Appl. Phys. 52 3363 [10] Marsh S P 1980 LASL Shock Hugoniot Data (Berkeley:University of California Press) p 5 [11] TouloukianY S, Kirby R K, Taylor R E and Lee T Y R 1970 Thermal Expansion-Metallic Solids: Thermophysical Properties ofMatters (New York: Plenum) vol 12 [12] Meyers M A 1994 Dynamic Behavior of Materials (NewYork: Plenum) 133 [13] Reinhart W D et al 2001 J. Impact Engin. 26625
2008, Vol. 25 
